Michael Deibert on the boycott of the PEN award to Charlie Hebdo last spring.
… Read the restI don’t think I had ever been ashamed to be a writer until that moment. It was a scandalous display born out of ignorance of the role of Charlie Hebdo, the function of satire, and the history of modern France as a whole. It was obvious from the nature of the letter that few, if any, of the signatories had probably ever read Charlie Hebdo before the attacks, and had instead formed their opinion on a handful of out-of-context cartoons culled from the publication’s 40 plus year history.
The authors seemed oblivious to the fact that satire’s function is to sting, not cause guffaws, and that