And while we’re at it…we might as well be at it, don’t you think?
Have I removed it enough yet?… Read the rest
(This is a syndicated post. Read the original at FreeThoughtBlogs.)
And while we’re at it…we might as well be at it, don’t you think?
Have I removed it enough yet?… Read the rest
(This is a syndicated post. Read the original at FreeThoughtBlogs.)
If you haven’t already, sign the petish.… Read the rest
(This is a syndicated post. Read the original at FreeThoughtBlogs.)
Reading Greta’s most recent post about…about friends and allies and misogyny and how to deal with it and talk about it. You know: what we’ve been talking about for months and months and months now. One thing that happened in the comments is that Justicar showed up to discuss the issues in a calm, reasoned, civil way…deceptively calm, reasoned, and civil. He’s not like that everywhere. He’s not like that at ERV and he’s not like it on his own blog.
Aerik pointed out one example that I don’t think I’d seen before (although who knows, maybe I did, I saw a lot last summer and no doubt I’ve forgotten most of it by now).
… Read the restOn top of attacking Watson
(This is a syndicated post. Read the original at FreeThoughtBlogs.)
Josh Rosenau has tweeted and done a post about how stupid I am to think beliefs aren’t a matter of identity*. Well that would be somewhat stupid if I had just stated it like that, but I didn’t. As is typical of Rosenau, he ignored all the qualifying language that would have made it clear that I wasn’t just stating it like that, and quoted 15 words as if they were all I had said.
Rosenau’s version:
beliefs aren’t actually a matter of identity and shouldn’t be treated as if they were.
With his commentary:
This claim seems so obviously false that I can’t really imagine how she could have written it.
The version I actually wrote:
… Read the restWhat if there
(This is a syndicated post. Read the original at FreeThoughtBlogs.)
This is a bad day. Ajita Kamal has died – in “an incident” in Tamil Nadu, which sounds as if he was killed, which seems different from just dying. Anyway he’s gone, which just sucks.
He founded Nirmukta. He was an inspiration to a lot of people.… Read the rest
(This is a syndicated post. Read the original at FreeThoughtBlogs.)
The Atheist, Secularist and Humanist Society at University College London is the object of attempted censorship by the university’s student union because the former used an image from Jesus and Mo on its Facebook page, and that, of course, is “offensive.”
… Read the restCiting a “number of complaints” regarding both the depiction of Muhammad and the fact that the image shows him with a drink that looks like beer, the union contacted the ASHS president demanding that he remove the image as soon as possible…Pointing out that UCL was the first university in Britain to be founded on secular principles, the ASHS have refused to remove the Jesus & Mo image and have launched an online petitionto defend free expression at
(This is a syndicated post. Read the original at FreeThoughtBlogs.)
NPR’s Barbara Bradley Hagerty haz a sad about the war on religion in the US.
… Read the restIf you’re looking for evidence that the Obama administration is hostile to faith, conservatives say, the new health care law is Exhibit A. The law requires employers to offer health care plans that cover contraceptives. Churches don’t have to, but religiously affiliated charities, hospitals and colleges do. That doesn’t sit well with the Catholic monks at Belmont Abbey College in North Carolina.
“When the government said to them, you’re going to have to fund contraception, sterilization, in violation of your deeply held religious convictions, the monks at Belmont Abbey College knew that they just couldn’t do that,” says attorney Hannah Smith at the Becket
(This is a syndicated post. Read the original at FreeThoughtBlogs.)
Eric asked, on the last thread,
When, say, Muslims say that, if we speak of their religion is such and such ways, they simply get angry and can’t see our point, what response do we give? For that’s what so many people have been saying about the new atheism. They’ve been calling it strident and shrill and things like that, and we’ve been accused of writing about religion in ways that simply offend the religious instead of engaging with them. Is there are clear way to make the distinction between the first point about taboo words, and the second about ways of expressing our distaste for, or our criticism of, certain ideas?
I had some related thoughts while these … Read the rest
(This is a syndicated post. Read the original at FreeThoughtBlogs.)
As I was saying… in free inquiry one doesn’t want taboos, to put it mildly. In political commitments, however, one does (in a sense).
What sense? Maybe the most basic one, the one you learn slowly as a child: that other people have minds too, and they are different from yours, and you can’t treat them just any old how.
Or maybe Google’s is a better version: don’t be evil. Or that of the Hippocratic Oath: first, do no harm. Or the first clause of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights:
… Read the restWhereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace
(This is a syndicated post. Read the original at FreeThoughtBlogs.)
Ron Lindsay wrote a post about freedom of expression and critical inquiry a couple of days ago, prompted mostly by the controversy over Ben Radford’s post (this is getting too meta already – so often the case) about pink toys and sexism.
Ron said:
The cornerstone of our mission is freedom of expression and critical inquiry. We see freedom of expression and critical inquiry as indispensable tools for arriving at an accurate understanding of just about any issue of importance, including, but not limited to, the truth of religious or fringe science claims.
Indeed.
There is a trope out there (this is nothing to do with Ron Lindsay) that goes something like: the “radical feminism” of a subset of … Read the rest
(This is a syndicated post. Read the original at FreeThoughtBlogs.)
Last night the CBC’s the fifth estate reported on the murder nearly 12 years ago of Jassi Sidhu, and the fact that her mother and uncle are suspected of having arranged the murder but have never been arrested.
You’ll already know from that what kind of murder it probably was. When Jassi was 2o her family wanted her to marry a man in India who was 40 years older and a stranger to her. She didn’t want to. She married someone else instead, because she liked him, but he wasn’t rich (or 60) and he drove a rickshaw.
Her mother and uncle have been arrested.
… Read the restA B.C. woman and her brother have been arrested in connection with the
(This is a syndicated post. Read the original at FreeThoughtBlogs.)
You have got to be kidding, Beeb.
Headline:
Do politicians ignore the ‘men’s vote’?
Listen to the Westminster political debate in recent months and you will hear one group regularly given special attention: women.
Ed Miliband has accused the government of introducing changes in areas such as social security that are “hitting women twice as hard as men”.
Meanwhile, David Cameron says that, with government initiatives like lifting over a million people out of paying tax, “it is mostly women who benefit”.
But what you will not hear is the opposite – top politicians saying they have policies specifically directed at male voters, or “male issues”.
You’re joking. You’re joking. Please tell me you’re joking.
… Read the restBut some men say
(This is a syndicated post. Read the original at FreeThoughtBlogs.)
Rushdie on Hitchens is simply…unbetterable.
… Read the restI have often been asked if Christopher defended me because he was my close friend. The truth is that he became my close friend because he wanted to defend me.
The spectacle of a despotic cleric with antiquated ideas issuing a death warrant for a writer living in another country, and then sending death squads to carry out the edict, changed something in Christopher. It made him understand that a new danger had been unleashed upon the earth, that a new totalizing ideology had stepped into the down-at-the-heels shoes of Soviet Communism. And when the brute hostility of American and British conservatives (Charles Krauthammer, Hugh Trevor-Roper, and Paul Johnson) joined forces with the appeasement politics
(This is a syndicated post. Read the original at FreeThoughtBlogs.)
About Julian’s latest Comment is Free post.
For aspiring-to-be-rational heathens like myself, texts such as Pope Benedict’s Christmas address to the Roman Curia are often used as target practice for sharpening our critical thinking skills and BS radars. How easy it is to take a sentence like, “Only faith gives me the conviction: it is good that I exist,” and reply, “Speak for yourself, mate.”
That’s not a good start. It’s one of those “statements we doubt were ever stated” items. I don’t think it’s true that for people like Julian, texts like the pope’s Xmas chat are often used as target practice for sharpening our critical thinking skills. I think that’s a covert dig at Those Other Atheists … Read the rest
(This is a syndicated post. Read the original at FreeThoughtBlogs.)
They warned them. They said get out in three days or we’ll kill you. Totally fair.
… Read the restGunmen have stormed a church service in Nigeria, killing six people and wounding 10, the church’s pastor said, the latest in a string of attacks that has raised fears of sectarian conflict in Africa’s most populous nation.
“It was around 7:30 pm (1830 GMT),” Pastor John Jauro told AFP news agency of Thursday’s attack in the city of Gombe.
“I was leading the congregation in prayers. Our eyes were closed when some gunmen stormed the church and opened fire on the congregation. Six people were killed in the attack and 10 others were wounded.”
He said there was confusion as worshippers sought to
(This is a syndicated post. Read the original at FreeThoughtBlogs.)
One for the Annals of Brazen Effrontery – Andrew Wakefield sues the BMJ for claiming his MMR study was fraudulent.
… Read the restIn a complaint filed to a district court in Texas, lawyers acting for Wakefield claim that articles, editorials and other statements that appeared in the BMJ were “false and make defamatory allegations” about the doctor.
The lawsuit names Fiona Godlee, the BMJ’s editor-in-chief, and the British investigative journalist Brian Deer, who has covered the controversy over the measles, mumps and rubella vaccine, which led to a drop in MMR vaccination rates to dangerous levels.
…
In a statement, the BMJ and Deer said they awaited formal service of the papers, but stood by the articles and had
(This is a syndicated post. Read the original at FreeThoughtBlogs.)
Oh lordy, it just never ends.
Staks Rosch did an Atheist of the Year contest at the Examiner, asking his readers to nominate candidates and giving them two days to do it. And the nominees are -
Lisa Ridge did a Facebook post gently wondering why there were quite so few women, as in, none. I read the post and Staks Rosch’s comments and a post he’d written on the subject, and got somewhat warm under the collar. From the post:
… Read the restI started with an open nomination process in which people could suggest nominations and make a case for their nominations. I would then take that into account
(This is a syndicated post. Read the original at FreeThoughtBlogs.)
Fresh Air yesterday did an interview with science writer Kitty Ferguson, who has written a biography of Stephen Hawking. There was one bit where Ferguson was summarizing Hawking on how it all began (to put it as crudely as possible) and mentioned his saying that ‘god’ wasn’t necessary for it to begin. Terri Gross paused to discuss this idea, and Ferguson rebuked Hawking for mentioning it.
He was out of his depth, she said. It’s not his subject. He’s not “an expert.”
What?
Who is “an expert” on this subject? What makes anyone an expert on this subject? What is the expertise involved?
I really don’t know. I don’t know what she thought she meant. Do people think there’s … Read the rest
(This is a syndicated post. Read the original at FreeThoughtBlogs.)
Check out the list of OIC countries in order of population. Ask yourself if you want to take advice on human rights from those countries.
Pakistan?
Bangladesh?
Iran?
Algeria?
Sudan?
Uzbekistan?
Afghanistan?
Saudi Arabia?
Yemen?
Syria?
Some are better than that, certainly, but many of them are also dubious as “Islamic states” even if you accept (as I don’t) the idea that a majority Muslim state is an “Islamic state.” Nigeria, Uganda, Mozambique? And anyway “better than Syria” isn’t much to boast of.… Read the rest
(This is a syndicated post. Read the original at FreeThoughtBlogs.)
Eric provides the text of Resolution 16/18. I don’t find it all that reassuring.
Recognizing the valuable contribution of people of all religions or beliefs to humanity and the contribution that dialogue among religious groups can make towards an improved awareness and understanding of the common values shared by all humankind,
The valuable contribution of people of all beliefs? That’s just gibberish. The contribution of people of some beliefs – and not rare ones – is the opposite of valuable. Lots of people have beliefs that women are both inferior and evil-rebellious, and thus have to be ferociously controlled and even more ferociously punished if they ever evade that control. That’s not valuable.
Ok it’s just a bit of … Read the rest
(This is a syndicated post. Read the original at FreeThoughtBlogs.)