Still lower

Jul 2nd, 2017 8:04 am | By

Today in Trump. Worse than ever, I’m afraid.

Some late yesterday first.

Yes, and a harsh indictment of our society, politics, discourse, education system, and much else that fact is…but bracket that, and it’s still the case that winning the election is not the same thing as succeeding in the job. Tragically and horribly and shamefully, Trump won the election by being a sexist racist xenophobic bullying pig, and despite being a liar and fraud and cheat. That says terrible depressing things about us as a country. But he is not winning the presidency. He’s failing dismally…and dragging us down with him. He won’t “continue to WIN” because what he’s doing can’t be described as winning. He’s trashing everything in sight, yes, but that’s not winning.

Again with the relentless Hitler-Goebbels-like attack on the free press. Not winning.

No. Bullying, insulting, and lying are not MODERN DAY anything. They’re just bullying, insulting, and lying. An evil malevolent enraged toddler-man is not MODERN DAY anything. It’s just an evil malevolent enraged toddler-man destroying everything in his path, like a hurricane.



The clenched fist of truth

Jul 1st, 2017 4:58 pm | By

Think Progress provides a transcript of that fascist video of Dana Loesch barking at us about the libbruls. Do watch it in addition, because mere words on the screen can’t convey the menacing venom of her delivery. The way she emphasizes “they” over and over again for instance is chilling.

They use their media to assassinate real news. They use their schools to teach children that their president is another Hitler. They use their movie stars and singers and award shows to repeat their narrative over and over again. And then they use their ex-president to endorse the resistance. All to make them march, make them protest, make them scream racism and sexism and xenophobia and homophobia and smash windows, burn cars, shut down interstates and airports, bully and terrorize the law abiding — until the only option left is for police to do their jobs and stop the madness.

And when that happens, they’ll use it as an excuse for their outrage. The only way we stop this, the only way we save our country and our freedom is to fight this violence of lies with the clenched fist of truth. I’m the National Rifle Association of America and I’m freedom’s safest place.

She’s on Twitter telling people that’s a call for the police to do their jobs and not at all a call to violence against libbruls. That’s a crock of shit. It’s literally true, and no doubt lawyers read it first to make sure, but the message it sends is another matter. Her words and presentation present “them” as a detested enemy and alien. Then she says “the only way we stop this” is with the clenched fist of truth and that she’s the National Rifle Association. That’s an implicit call to violence. The fact that it’s implicit probably protects it from the law, but that doesn’t mean we have to pretend the implicit call to violence isn’t there. It’s there.

It’s there the way it’s there when a man’s voice goes metallic with rage as he tells a woman off for making him angry. It’s meant to strike fear in the hearts of “them” and patriotic manly Caucasian fury in the hearts of “our” men.

The ad was played at the National Rifle Association’s Leadership Forum in April. As we reported at the time, NRA executive vice president Wayne LaPierre’s speech to thousands of members was characterized by a similar type of us-versus-them rhetoric.

“It’s up to us to speak up against the three most dangerous voices in America: academic elites, political elites, and media elites. These are America’s greatest domestic threats,” he said.

That too is frightening. The people who know the most and have the most expertise are America’s greatest domestic threats, and the most dangerous voices.

It’s funny that people think it’s exaggerated to say this is fascism or Nazi-like. Fascism isn’t special, after all – it’s not like some higher class of violent bully. It’s just ordinary people drunk on this kind of thing, and putting it into action. It can happen anywhere. Right now it’s happening here in the US.



They

Jul 1st, 2017 12:32 pm | By

Well this is terrifying.

https://youtu.be/PrnIVVWtAag



The cornered animal

Jul 1st, 2017 12:20 pm | By

I generally avoid Maureen Dowd, but she summons some eloquence on the Monster in Chief:

The 71-year-old president’s pathological inability to let go of slights; his strongman reflex to be the aggressor and bite back like a cornered animal, without regard for societal norms; his lack of self-awareness about the power he commands and the proportionality of his responses; his grotesque hunger for flattery and taste for Tony Soprano tactics; his Pravda partnership with David Pecker, the head honcho at The National Enquirer, which has been giving Trump the Il Duce treatment while sliming his political opponents, the “Morning Joe” anchors and Megyn Kelly — these are all matters that should alarm men and women equally.

Trump has moved his shallow kiddie wading pool of gossip and ridicule from Trump Tower to the White House, where it is so outlandishly out of place that it often feels like we have a Page Six reporter as our president.

The cornered animal and the kiddie wading pool are good metaphors.

Before he got to D.C., Trump was used to media that could be bought, sold and bartered with. He is not built for this hostile environment and it shows in his deteriorating psychological state. Even though he’s in the safest space of all, he’s not in a safe space.

Trump has always been obsessed with looks — his own, men’s and women’s. One of his favorite phrases is “Here’s the beauty of me.” He walks through life as though he’s the judge in an ’80s swimsuit contest — even with his own wives and older daughter. “She’s got the best body,” was his typical refrain about Ivanka.

Or as though he’s Mark Zuckerberg at Harvard, grading all the female students on their looks. Word is he’s thinking about running for president next time.

Then we get a bit of new information:

I gave Trump the benefit of the doubt after his comment on Megyn Kelly about “blood coming out of her wherever” when he claimed he meant her nose. But later, a longtime Trump associate told me that Trump had practiced that line before he said it on CNN and that it was meant to evoke an image of Kelly as hormonal.

No low is too low.



Dispatches from the White House

Jul 1st, 2017 11:32 am | By

Still ringing the same bells.

He thinks Trudeau likes him. He always thinks people like him if they’re not openly rude to him. For awhile he was telling us Obama liked him, because Obama was polite to him in their meeting. Yeah, right, Don, Obama likes you in spite of the whole birther thing. Sure he does.

The president of the Yooonited States, everyone, gossiping about a Fox News personality.

Attacking the free press again. (Also getting it wrong a Fake News outlet would not have fired the reporters. Just look at Fox.)

And, finally, the screaming toddler makes yet another appearance.



Look 20 years out

Jun 30th, 2017 5:51 pm | By

Robert Reich on Facebook:

The Senate bill to replace the Affordable Care Act is much worse than even the Congressional Budget Office found, because the CBO looked only at the first 10 years. During the next 10 years, the elderly and disabled lose 25 percent more, children lose 30 percent more, adults on Medicaid almost 40 percent, and working class people who relied on the Medicaid expansion lose over half of what they had before. The 1965 Medicaid program is gutted.

No automatic alt text available.

 



Fewer voters, more vote hacking

Jun 30th, 2017 4:52 pm | By

It’s a good thing The Nation has Ari Berman on staff, because there sure is a lot of voting rights reporting to do under the Trump putsch. Just yesterday, he reports, there were four ominous moves against voting rights.

 1. The House Appropriations Committee voted to defund the Election Assistance Commission, the only federal agency that helps states make sure their voting machines aren’t hacked. The House Administration Committee previously voted to kill the EAC in February, but yesterday’s vote makes it one step closer to reality—practically inviting Russia to try to hack our elections again.

I for one welcome our new Putinist overlords.

 2. The Department of Justice sent a letter to all 50 states informing them that “we are reviewing voter registration list maintenance procedures in each state covered by the NVRA [National Voter Registration Act]” and asking how they plan to remove voters from the rolls. While this might sound banal, it’s a clear instruction to states from the federal government to start purging the voting rolls. “Let’s be clear what this letter signals: DOJ Civil Rights is preparing to sue states to force them to trim their voting rolls,” tweeted Sam Bagenstos, the former deputy assistant attorney general for civil rights in the Obama administration.

That’s incredibly disturbing.

 3. The White House commission on election integrity, led by vice chair Kris Kobach, also sent a letter to 50 states asking them to provide sweeping voter data including “the full first and last names of all registrants, middle names or initials if available, addresses, dates of birth, political party (if recorded in your state), last four digits of social security number if available, voter history (elections voted in) from 2006 onward, active/inactive status, cancelled status, information regarding any felony convictions, information regarding voter registration in another state, information regarding military status, and overseas citizen information.” While Kobach asked for “publicly-available voter roll data,” much of this information, like someone’s Social Security number or military status, is, in fact, private. Never before has a White House asked for such broad data on voters, and it could be easily manipulated by Trump’s commission. Kobach has a very well-documented record of making wildly misleading claims about voter fraud and enacting policies that sharply limit access to the ballot in his home state of Kansas. He’s been sued four times by the ACLU for voter suppression and was sanctioned by a federal court last week for “deceptive conduct and lack of candor.”

Ari is tweeting regularly about the states that are telling Kobach to fuck off, and there are a lot of them. Even Mississippi is one – Mississippi! The count is currently at 24.

 4. The Trump administration named Hans von Spakovsky of the Heritage Foundation as a member of the commission, who’s done more than anyone other than Kobach to spread the myth of voter fraud and enact suppressive policies. Von Spakovsky was special counsel to the Bush administration’s Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights Brad Schlozman, who said he wanted to “gerrymander all of those crazy libs right out of the [voting] section.” It was a time when longtime civil-rights lawyers were pushed out of the Justice Department and the likes of Schlozman and von Spakovsky reversed the Civil Rights Division’s traditional role of safeguarding voting rights. When von Spakovsky was nominated to the FEC, six former lawyers in the voting section called him “the point person for undermining the Civil Rights Division’s mandate to protect voting rights.”

Read the whole article for important details.



Don’t let them silence you

Jun 30th, 2017 12:27 pm | By

But does misogyny really matter?

Sally Feldman at the New Humanist:

In their recent memoirs both [Harriet] Harman and [Jess] Phillips – the head girl and naughty first former of Parliament – not only offer impressive accounts of their formidable achievements, but also chronicle the endless sexism that poisons political life. And both are committed to making the path easier for the next generation.

But while Harman deplores the prejudices that women in public life have always had to face, Phillips rages against the newest weapon in the sex wars: internet trolling.

Revealing that she once received 600 rape threats in one day, she gives us a sample of the kind of abuse that comes tweeting her way.

You know what would be funny. Pouring molten iron down this cunt’s cunt until she starts vomiting bullets. These are the kind of people who deserve to be bound up in a basement and repeatedly raped. I think watching her spirit die as you slowly removed strips of skin would be a really rewarding experience. Remove the eyes last, she should have her mutilated broken body be the last thing she sees.

Phillips is not alone. A number of online trolls have been convicted of threats towards female MPs, including two who subjected the Liverpool MP Luciana Berger to campaigns of antisemitic abuse. In 2014 a man was jailed for 18 weeks for bombarding the Labour MP Stella Creasy with messages threatening to rape her.

And Shadow Home Secretary Diane Abbott recently broke her long silence about the constant poisonous verbal attacks that she has had to endure. Messages like “Get yourself spat at by someone with HIV and die a horrible death.”

It’s ironic to have a prominent head of state joining in.

Feldman veers into a discussion of misogynist violence in tv and movies, and then returns to the just plain misogyny and its silencing effect.

This is Phillips’s message, too. “I am often contacted by young women who are looking for support and advice about how to deal with the vitriol, sexism and misogyny they face every time they speak. Most of these women tell me they’re going to stop posting blogs and tweeting about their politics and their views. The very first thing I say to every one of them is ‘Don’t stop, whatever you do. Don’t let them silence you.’” Abbott agrees that online abuse has become so “turbo-charged” that “it’s almost as if they want to drive some of us out of politics.”

When their identities are uncovered these tweeters will claim that this kind of harassment is just a bit of “fun”, of laddish “banter”, that it doesn’t mean anything. But for the women on the receiving end it never feels like fun. And one horrifying event last year demonstrated just where such vicious hate campaigns can lead. An outspoken and vigorous activist, the Labour MP Jo Cox had been bombarded with brutal Twitter attacks before she was murdered. She was, appallingly, well and truly silenced.

I don’t believe those who insist that overt hatred and contempt is “just” anything; I don’t believe it’s inert or “just” a pressure release. I don’t think it works that way.



The search for meaning

Jun 30th, 2017 11:55 am | By

The other day Fresh Air did a conversation with a reporter about the health insurance battle; one item jumped out at me:

DAVIES: This is FRESH AIR. I’m Dave Davies in for Terry Gross, who’s off this week. We’re talking with Sarah Kliff about the Senate health care bill. Majority Leader Mitch McConnell had hoped to get it to a vote before the July 4 recess but has postponed action because he can’t get enough support for it to pass. Sarah Kliff is senior policy correspondent for Vox and co-host of its podcast “The Weeds.”

When we left off, Kliff had explained that the Congressional Budget Office found the bill would leave millions more uninsured and would increase health care costs for many Americans, especially older people. You’ve been covering this issue in Washington for a long time. You must talk to Republican staff and senators. What do they say when these questions are raised about whether people are going to end up paying a lot more and getting poorer coverage?

KLIFF: Yeah, that’s been one of the, you know, interesting and different things from covering the last health care debate, which I did. You know, back then in 2009 and 2010 when I talked to Democrats about their health care bill and asked them, you know, what’s the point of all of this, they would say, we want to increase coverage and reduce costs. It would be some variation on that line. You know, when I and my colleagues at Vox talked to Republican senators over the past few weeks and ask, you know, what’s the goal of this whole thing? We’ve heard back from multiple Republican senators. The goal is to get 51 votes. The goal is really less about policy and more about passing something.

Fucking hell.

That’s not surprising, I suppose, but it’s profoundly depressing, and horrifying. Democrats want to expand coverage; Republicans want to win. The issue is life and death, and Republicans’ goal is to win.



Smile, bitch

Jun 30th, 2017 11:26 am | By

Peter Beinart on the two flavors of sexism:

On Thursday, Donald Trump tweeted that MSNBC’s Mika Brzezinski had been “bleeding badly from a face-lift” when she visited Mar-a-Lago last December. On Tuesday, in the Oval Office, he interrupted a phone call with the Irish prime minister to call over a female Irish journalist, Caitriona Perry, while referring to her “nice smile” and “this beautiful Irish press.”

The incidents are two sides of the same coin.

Or to put it more clearly, they’re the same thing in different moods. The sexist insult and the sexist compliment are both expressions of patronage, of ownership, of altitude. The complimentary version can in fact be worse, because if not obediently and gratefully received it can leap instantly into verbal and even physical aggression. I happened to see a guy doing exactly this just yesterday: he asked a woman what she’d done to alter her appearance, she responded uncertainly, and he instantly went into fake-jocular exclamations about how “It’s impossible to give you women compliments!!” hardeharhar. He laughed his ass off, she fake-laughed a little because who knew where he would go next. I thought about all the things I’d like to say to him but wasn’t going to.

Two decades ago, a pair of social psychologists, Susan Fiske and Peter Glick, distinguished between what they called “hostile” and “benevolent” sexism. Hostile sexism manifests itself in derogatory or threatening comments about a woman’s appearance, capacities, or behavior. Benevolent sexism, by contrast, manifests itself in praise or chivalry that nonetheless reaffirms a woman’s subordinate status. Telling your female coworker that she’s ugly is an expression of hostile sexism. Telling your female coworker that she’s pretty is an expression of benevolent sexism. Sexually assaulting a female colleague is an expression of hostile sexism. Suggesting that a female colleague needs help carrying her bags is an expression of benevolent sexism. Hostile sexism may be more antagonistic and aggressive but benevolent sexism also conveys the message that women should be valued for their appearance, and that they are not equal to men.

And benevolent sexism can be unbelievably patronizing – as when a man whose arms are fully occupied carrying a heavy load of something won’t let a woman hold a door open for him. (I’ve had that experience.)

The more a woman conforms to traditional gender norms, the more likely she is to experience benevolent sexism. The more she threatens them, the more likely she is to experience hostile sexism.

Heads he wins, tails she loses.

Viscerally, Trump likely understands what the research shows: that focusing people’s attention on a woman’s appearance makes them value her abilities less. For a 2009 study in the Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Nathan Heflick and Jamie Goldenberg asked one group of college students to write about Sarah Palin’s appearance and another to write about her “human essence.” Then both groups were asked a series of questions about her. The students who had written about her appearance rated her as less competent. In a different study, participants told to focus on Michelle Obama’s looks deemed her less competent, too.

This of course is why his “compliments” to Perry were more pseudo-benevolent than genuinely so – she was working, so his irrelevant eruptions about her smile were fundamentally insulting, as if she were there to be eye candy as opposed to doing her job.

The good news is that it motivates us to fight back. The bad news is that it grinds us down.

What Trump may not grasp is the different effects benevolent and hostile sexism have on the women who experience them. Jennifer Bosson, a professor of psychology at the University of South Florida, told me that, “benevolent sexism reminds women of male protection and of the benefits of being pretty. It can leave women immobilized.” Hostile sexism, by contrast, “pisses women off. They get motivated to fight back.” As Becker and Wright put it, “benevolent sexism undermines, whereas hostile sexism promotes social change.”

Hostile sexism seems to motivate women even when they merely observe it happening to others. A 2010 study by Stephenie Chaudoir and Diane Quinn of the University of Connecticut found that merely hearing a man speak in demeaning sexual terms to another woman made female college students “feel greater anger and motivation to take direct action toward men.”

There’s some evidence that Trump’s hostile sexism, as evidenced most infamously in the Access Hollywood tape released last October, has had exactly that result. A post-election study found that people who were more angered by Trump’s comments about women were more likely to take political action to oppose him. This January’s women’s march in Washington was the largest in American history.

That’s the good news. The bad news is that while women often initially react to hostile sexism with outrage and a desire to reassert their dignity, the effects of persistent hostile sexism can be debilitating. A 1993 study by the University of Illinois’s Louise Fitzgerald found that women who suffer ongoing sexual harassment or disparagement “experience lower morale and job satisfaction and increased absenteeism, anger, anxiety, depression, and physical illness symptoms.”

That’s the paradox for anyone who gives a shit about anything, really. You’re motivated, but you’re also subject to disappointment and frustration.

[Editing to add – “altitude” isn’t a typo – it’s a rather cryptic way of saying “higher position on the social ladder.”]



Our least-favorite quality in Trump: everything about him

Jun 29th, 2017 5:49 pm | By

Here is an interesting concept –

Twitter is also a regular reminder of what has long been Americans’ least-favorite quality in Trump: his temperament. A Quinnipiac University poll this month found that just 29 percent of Americans describe Trump as “levelheaded.” Even one-third of Republicans said the president is not a prudent man.

Our “least favorite quality”? What, because he has other, better ones? His temperament is everything. It’s not as if you can put his temperament to one side in order to give due credit to other things about him; his temperament suffuses everything he does and says. It’s a very “Aside from that, Mrs Lincoln, how did you enjoy the play?” idea that Trump is separable from his temperament. It’s the fact that he’s a mean vengeful narcissistic reckless pig that causes us to detest him. Other than that, he’s not so bad.



Evidence

Jun 29th, 2017 5:17 pm | By

Brian Stelter clarifies what Mika Brzezinski actually looked like last New Year’s.



Imagine

Jun 29th, 2017 1:18 pm | By

It’s being a tragic day. Let’s play a popular game I just invented called Fantasy Headlines.

Trump Dragged Away Screaming by Federal Marshalls

Trump Extradited to ICC for Crimes Against Humanity

Trump Convicted on Multiple Counts of Fraud, Corruption, Perjury, Witness Tampering

Sentenced to 375 years

Rape Victim Wins Case Against Trump

Awarded 7 billion dollars in damages, vows to share with Trump’s other victims

Trump’s Hair Sculpture Blown Off in Sudden Unexpected Gale

Trump Addresses Rally in Omaha

Crowd laughs, heckles, throws popcorn

Trump Found to Owe the US Public 3 Trillion Dollars

Judge draws up payment plan

Trump Tower on the market for 600k

Mar-a-Lago Alligator Attacks Trump

Nothing left but the red baseball cap



Read this and gasp

Jun 29th, 2017 12:56 pm | By

Sigh. Not this crap again.



The cardinal

Jun 29th, 2017 11:57 am | By

It’s Cardinal Pell’s turn.

Victoria Police has confirmed Cardinal Pell has been charged on summons over multiple allegations and is due to face Melbourne Magistrates Court on July 18 for a filing hearing.

A statement from the Catholic Archdiocese of Sydney said Cardinal Pell had been informed of Victoria Police’s “decision and action”.

He denies all the allegations and says he’ll defend himself vigorously.

Cardinal Pell is the third most senior Catholic at the Vatican, where he is responsible for the church’s finances.

He is likely to step aside from his Vatican post while he fights the charges.

Victoria’s Deputy Police Commissioner, Shane Patton, confirmed in a brief press conference on Thursday morning that Cardinal Pell had been issued with multiple charges relating to historical sexual abuse allegations.

The charges were served on Cardinal Pell’s legal representatives in Melbourne on Thursday, Mr Patton said.

“There are multiple complainants relating to those charges,” he said.

Mr Patton said there had been a lot of speculation about the process that has been involved in the investigation of Cardinal Pell.

“The process and procedures that are being followed in the charging of Cardinal Pell have been the same that have been applied in a whole range of historical sex offences, whenever we investigate them,” he said.

“Cardinal Pell has been treated the same as anyone else in this investigation.”

So that’s interesting.



Trump’s true self

Jun 29th, 2017 10:58 am | By

Michelle Goldberg points out that Trump is a pig.

There’s a lot you can say about these tweets; among other things, it’s striking that Trump thinks that when journalists seek access to him, it means they like him. But I was most struck by Trump’s raw misogyny. Obviously, that’s not because Trumpian misogyny is anything new, but because, from the time he was inaugurated until this week, he’s mostly been holding it in.

Trump does not get much credit for being disciplined, but for the last five months, he’s mostly checked his tendencies to leeringly appraise women’s looks, at least in public. (Vanity Fair did report in April that during a visit by the Japanese Prime Minister, “the president told an acquaintance that he was obsessed with the translator’s breasts.”) So far, there’s been no reported pussy-grabbing in the Oval Office, no stumbling in[to] women’s changing rooms or fantasizing aloud about female subordinates on their knees. Instead Trump, like other Republicans before him, has sublimated his misogyny into policies: expanding the global gag rule, sabotaging federal family planning programs, eroding enforcement of the law against gender discrimination in education.

But the pressure and stress have been steadily increasing.

When you’re under pressure, it can be harder to hide your true self. And Trump’s true self is a pig.

She read my mind. President Pig is what I’ve been calling him all morning.

On Tuesday, Trump interrupted a phone call with Ireland’s Prime Minister to sexually harass an Irish journalist named Caitriona Perry. Calling her forward, he said, “And where are you from? Go ahead. Come here, come here. Where are you from? We have all of this beautiful Irish press.” She stepped forward awkwardly and he looked her over. Then, returning to the call, he said with a smirk, “She has a nice smile on her face so I bet she treats you well.”

Trump’s insult of Brzezinski is the other side of this connoisseurship. To Trump, women’s worth lies in their fuckability; it’s why he’s praised his own daughter by saying he’d sleep with her if they weren’t related. Trump’s tweet was meant to make Brzezinski seem grotesque and pathetic, a failure in the struggle to remain attractive—the only struggle that, in his eyes, really matters for women.

Plus the bleeding thing, which again betrays his piggish revulsion at women for menstruating.

I’m not sure that even well-intentioned men understand how relentlessly degrading this presidency is for many women. Having a man who does not recognize the humanity of more than half the population in a position of such power is a daily insult; it never really goes away. Perhaps this is why many women found the TV version of The Handmaid’s Tale so resonant, even though Trump, the former owner of a casino strip club, is the last person one can imagine instituting a Calvinist theocracy. Gilead’s fictional dystopia captures our constant incredulous horror at finding ourselves ruled by thuggish, unaccountable woman-haters who appear to revel in their own impunity.

Yep. It’s not an accident that I keep citing the way he talks about Elizabeth Warren and Alicia Machado among others.

It is an incredible horror living in a country with that man as its executive.



Ten times harder

Jun 29th, 2017 10:05 am | By

The more I think about it the more staggering – and yet all too predictable – it is that Melania Trump’s people think it’s fine to justify his vulgar sexist vicious tweets by saying: “As the first lady has stated publicly in the past, when her husband gets attacked, he will punch back 10 times harder.”

In fact you could read that as a captive Melania signaling to the rest of us. “I keep telling you – he’s an authoritarian bully who thinks he’s the only important person in the world.”

But you can also read it more straightforwardly as his wife dutifully saying what he would say: nobody has any right to criticize The Great and Awesome Donald Trump, and if anyone does dare to criticize him, he will retaliate not with an equivalent response but with ten times more venom. You criticize him, he will tear you into pieces and feed you to the alligators.

He has everything backward. He’s ignoring the fact that taking the job of head of state means having to put up with endless criticism and dissent and indeed mockery. He thinks it works the other way – that once you’re head of state  you have the power to force people to say you’re awesome.

Not yet you don’t, Donnie. Not yet.



In unusually personal and vulgar terms

Jun 29th, 2017 9:22 am | By

The Times on Trump’s vulgar attack on a woman tv host:

President Trump assailed the television host Mika Brzezinski on Thursday in unusually personal and vulgar terms, the latest of a string of escalating attacks by the president on the national news media.

And women. There’s more than one pattern here. There’s Trump’s loathing and disgust at women as well as his hatred of independent journalism.

The graphic nature of the president’s suggestion that Ms. Brzezinski had undergone plastic surgery was met with immediate criticism on social media. Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina, wrote on Twitter, “Mr. President, your tweet was beneath the office and represents what is wrong with American politics, not the greatness of America.” And a spokesman for NBC News, Mark Kornblau, wrote on Twitter: “Never imagined a day when I would think to myself, ‘It is beneath my dignity to respond to the President of the United States.’ ”

In a statement Thursday morning, MSNBC said, “It’s a sad day for America when the president spends his time bullying, lying and spewing petty personal attacks instead of doing his job.”

Ms. Sanders, in an interview on Fox News, defended Mr. Trump’s tweets.

“I don’t think that the president has ever been someone who gets attacked and doesn’t push back,” she told the Fox anchor Bill Hemmer. “This is a president who fights fire with fire and certainly will not be allowed to be bullied by liberal media, and the liberal elites within the media.”

No, this is not a president who fights fire with fire. It’s a president who fights criticism with vulgar sexist trashy personal insults.

Jenna Johnson at the Post:

President Trump lashed out at the hosts of MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” in two vicious tweets on Thursday morning, calling Mika Brzezinski “I.Q. Crazy” and claiming that she had a facelift late last year.

Brian Stelter at CNN:

Even by President Trump’s standards, these tweets were shocking.

On Thursday morning, while MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” was on the air, Trump posted a pair of hateful tweets about co-hosts Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski.

Trump claimed that Scarborough and Brzezinski courted him for an interview at Mar-a-Lago around the New Year’s Eve holiday.

“She was bleeding badly from a face-lift. I said no!” the president wrote.

He actually said yes, according to accounts of their meeting. Trump, Scarborough and Brzezinski mingled with guests and had a private chat.

For the record, photos from Mar-a-Lago do not show any blood or bandages on Brzezinski’s face.

Imagine my surprise to learn it was a lie as well as a vulgar trashy insult.

Stunned commenters on social media noted that Trump targeted both hosts with his barbed tweets, but only opined on the physical appearance of the woman involved.

Democratic commentator Maria Cardona, speaking on CNN, said it was part of a pattern of misogynistic behavior by Trump.

And not what you’d call a subtle or stealthy one.

Melania Trump is fine with it though.

First lady Melania Trump is standing by President Donald Trump’s Thursday morning tweets criticizing MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” co-host Mika Brzezinski.

No no no – don’t normalize it. He wasn’t “criticizing” them.

“As the First Lady has stated publicly in the past, when her husband gets attacked, he will punch back 10 times harder,” the first lady’s communications director Stephanie Grisham said in a statement to CNN when asked about the tweets.

Er…? That’s the definition of a bully.

Also, it’s wholly inappropriate for an elected head of state. We’re allowed to criticize him, indeed it’s our civic duty to criticize him if he’s wrong or incompetent or a vulgar trashy misogynist bully.

We’re living in a sewer in this country. A sewer.



A nation’s pride

Jun 29th, 2017 8:25 am | By

Ladies and gentlemen – the PRESident of the UNIted STATES!

Hail to the Chief plays in the background



Call your office, sir

Jun 28th, 2017 5:56 pm | By

Another abusive Trump lie mocked.

I don’t think we’ve ever had a president who lied so openly and shamelessly and frequently and repeatedly. In fact it may be logistically impossible for us to have had such a thing, since Twitter was founded in 2006 and Bush and Obama used it only sparingly (and formally). Before Twitter there was no medium to lie this openly and repeatedly. Nixon may for all I know have told more lies in total, or more on a daily basis, but he didn’t also do it so openly, because he had no mechanism to do it that way. He could have given multiple press conferences every day but that would have been weird. No, Twitter is unique this way, and Trump loves him some Twitter.

He degrades himself and us every day with this childish lying.