Uppity women are Karens, or if they’re not Karens then they’re whiny hysterical babies.

Describing a pregnant woman as “very emotional and tearful” in the workplace amounted to discrimination, a tribunal has ruled. The ruling relates to an email sent by the boss of an account manager after she raised concerns about her workload.

…

Roger Tynan, an employment judge, said Hinds’s boss, Nav Kalley, had stereotyped her as “an emotional, hormonal pregnant woman and that in the particular circumstances his description of her as emotional and tearful was dismissive and belittling”.

That’s one version of The Art of Making Women Shut Up and Go Away. Another is this flower:

The full tweet reads:

Beautifully nuanced & punches pulled to devastating effect . I suspect the vulva atrophied some years ago, following mucho self congratulation & over consumption of vino collapseau? Any connotation of sexual congress since, has brought a tear to her eye rather than any joy jelly leaks to the knickers…..is my guess as to why she tastes soo bitter?

I suppose it’s too much to hope that he’s in Scotland…

Now isn’t she crafty.

Social media comments made by JK Rowling challenging Scotland’s new hate crime law are not being treated as criminal, Police Scotland has said. The Harry Potter author described several transgender women as men, including convicted prisoners, trans activists and other public figures.

The new law creates a new crime of “stirring up hatred” relating to protected characteristics. The force said complaints had been received but no action would be taken.

Reacting to the news, Ms Rowling posted on X: “I hope every woman in Scotland who wishes to speak up for the reality and importance of biological sex will be reassured by this announcement, and I trust that all women – irrespective of profile or financial means – will be treated equally under the law.

HaHA. See what she did? If they had taken action, there would have been an eruption. Since they didn’t take action, she’s set a precedent.

Nice.lee.done.

Katie Neeves, a trans woman who was appointed a UN Women UK delegate, was mentioned by Ms Rowling in a previous thread on X. The author claimed Ms Neeves “switched from straight man to lesbian at the age of 48”.

Ms Neeves told BBC News she was “very disappointed” with Police Scotland. She said: “JK Rowling is a bully and this act was designed to stop bullying, and if they’re not going to enforce it then that’s very disappointing.”

Yeeeah you’d like that, wouldn’t you, Martin. Who is the bully here? Is it really JK Rowling, who doesn’t want to see people thrown in prison for saying men are not women? Really?

King Lear without the peripeteia.

It took Donald Trump less than 24 hours to test the boundaries of Judge Juan Merchan’s gag order in his New York criminal trial.

In two posts on his Truth Social account, the former president attacked Merchan for issuing the gag order – and he went after the judge’s daughter for her liberal political work, exploiting the ambiguous language in the order that didn’t explicitly forbid discussion of Merchan’s family.

On Monday, Merchan pushed back, expanding the gag order to cover his family – though the judge remains fair game for Trump – and attempting to limit Trump’s vitriol two weeks before the trial is set to begin.

Merchan’s need to issue a second gag order highlights the significant and unique challenge that Trump poses for the judge overseeing the unprecedented first criminal trial in US history of a former president and current presidential candidate.

It’s unprecedented because Trump is an unprecedentedly awful human being. Your average self-dealing sleaze would go to quite a lot of trouble to avoid all this courtroom stuff and the disgrace that goes with it, but not Trump. He loves being the worst human on the planet, and he keeps breaking new ground in order to hang onto the title.

In the past six months, Trump has sat in a half-dozen different courtrooms before judges overseeing his four criminal and two of his civil cases, along with a federal appellate court. A CNN review of Trump’s appearances shows how the former president has taken repeated steps both inside and outside the courtroom to test the limits of judges – and the judicial system – trying to rein him in.

Who does that? A childish vain bully, that’s who.

The Beeb reports a scandal:

The prime minister has said people should not be criminalised “for stating simple facts on biology” in response to JK Rowling’s criticism of Scotland’s new hate crime law.

Cue global gasps. What can he mean?? People should be beheaded for such an outrage.

The author took to social media to hit out at criticize the Hate Crime and Public Order (Scotland) Act which came into effect on Monday.

Seriously, Beeb – stop that. Stop calling dissent you dislike “hitting out at.” It’s childish at best. Some metaphors are best left on the cutting room floor.

In a series of social media posts, Ms Rowling described several transgender women as men, including convicted prisoners, trans activists and other public figures.

What do you mean “described as”? Of course they’re men. That’s what “transgender” means in that sentence.

The prime minister would not be drawn on whether he supported her approach, saying that it was “not right for me to comment on police matters, individual matters”. But he added: “We should not be criminalising people saying common sense things about biological sex, clearly that isn’t right.”

Well, apologies for agreeing with a Tory, but it can’t be helped.

Furthermore, there’s the scandalous situation where gynecologists don’t know how to take care of a “neo-vagina”:

…the aftercare, becuzz a lot of times these women have a neovagina, and then the gynecologists aren’t trained to do the routine gyn care – and that’s a real problem, becuzz you go back to yer home state, and you wanna get yer well woman exam and the gynecologist tells you, like, “I don’t know how to take care of you.” That’s really not acceptable.

But gynecologists specialize in women’s reproductive health. Women’s. Not men’s, not men’s who call themselves women, not men’s who have “neovaginas.” Just women’s; women’s only.

BBC dutifully repeats that JK Rowling is bad awful horrible outrageous and above all of course transphobic.

The presenter tells us, in full BBC RP smug confident style:

…and now with a series of pretty explosive social media posts campaigner and provocateur on free speech. In response to the Hate Crime and Public Order Act coming into force in Scotland yesterday Ms Rowling posted critical and sarcastic comments about ten transgender women, rounding off her series with the remark “The people aren’t women at all but men every last one of them.” She ended by saying “Arrest me, Hate Crime Act Scotland.” As culture war interventions go, this was no holds barred.

Easy for him, isn’t it, just as it’s easy for Jolyon Maugham and Owen Jones and all the rest of them. Not their problem. No threat to their rights. How dare all these stupid bitches try to hang on to their hard-won rights! Gather ’round to sneer and frown at the bad woman with her culture war intervention. Meanwhile let’s ask a man what he thinks about it. Let’s ask the very cool Katie Neeves.

Male voice:

I thought ‘Oh I’m gunna get a ton of hate now,’ and sure enough that’s exactly what happened, and that’s exactly what she wanted to happen –

And it’s exactly what “Katie” wanted to happen too. It’s what they live for, this fake martyrdom.

Presenter asks him if he thinks Rowling committed hate crime.

Yes, I do actually, and she’s definitely inciting it – she knows she’s pushing the boundaries, and that’s why she made it very clear that she wasn’t in the country when she did it.

Yes, she is pushing the boundaries: the boundaries that men like “Katie” Neeves have set up to prevent women from talking about women’s rights as opposed to the rights of men in skirts.

She doesn’t do it for the hell of it, or to shock prissy BBC presenters, or to annoy guys like “Katie” Neeves. She does it because the brainless ideology that says men are women if they say they are is a locomotive running over women’s rights.

What a colossally stupid question.

What’s the wound to lesbianism, really, if, um. the category of women is expanded to include trans women, what’s the wou – what – where – how do any of the people who live in that category, how are they actually suffering, it seems to me that what they’re suffering from is a kind of hatred or phobia that is overwhelming to them.

Gee, I don’t know, prof, what’s the wound if the category of workers is expanded to include bosses, what’s the wound if the category of poor people is expanded to include rich people, what’s the wound if the category of Black people is expanded to include White people, what’s the wound if the category of indigenous people is expanded to include invaders, what’s the wound if the category of rape victims is expanded to include rapists?

Butler actually wrote a book about power (which I haven’t read and won’t read because I cannot stand her way of writing). You’d think she’d at least know enough not to ask an abysmally stupid question like that.

Jolyon is on the case. Of course he is.

Nothing says ‘social justice campaigner’ like being a White man who lives in a £3 million windmill defending men who take women’s jobs and rape shelters and everything else they can get their hands on.

This is genius.

Not a joke. The screenshot is from their Facebook page.

They reported in another public post ten hours ago:

Important Statement: First Minister Humza Yousaf/Scottish government have been reported to the Police for racism.

(Police Reporting number:

PS – 20240401-0595)

The Indian Council of Scotland/UK are surprised to read Scottish Government Police Scotland Hate Crime guidance highlighting White Men aged 18 to 30 yrs from socially excluded backgrounds (Working Class) in a negative manner, as this could create unfair bias against them. The Equality and Human Rights Commission of Scotland has a duty to ensure public bodies ‘Foster good relations’ between different Ethnic groups, and this information could incite.

Neil Lal, Chairman and President of The Indian Council of Scotland/UK had stated “We are deeply concerned and offended for everyone who is affected with this Hate Crime guidance by the Scottish government/Police Scotland. This is racism to it’s core in my opinion! We have taken the decision to report this to the Police authorities! We have asked to hold the First Minister Humza Yousaf/Scottish government accountable along with Police Scotland. Any form of racism is not acceptable”.

Genius, I say.

Soooo how is day one of Scotland’s hate crime bill going?

3.5k likes at present:

JKR has thrown down the gauntlet.

She starts with a string of parody “behold this lovely trans woman” tweets and then gets down to business.

In passing the Scottish Hate Crime Act, Scottish lawmakers seem to have placed higher value on the feelings of men performing their idea of femaleness, however misogynistically or opportunistically, than on the rights and freedoms of actual women and girls. The new legislation is wide open to abuse by activists who wish to silence those of us speaking out about the dangers of eliminating women’s and girls’ single-sex spaces, the nonsense made of crime data if violent and sexual assaults committed by men are recorded as female crimes, the grotesque unfairness of allowing males to compete in female sports, the injustice of women’s jobs, honours and opportunities being taken by trans-identified men, and the reality and immutability of biological sex. For several years now, Scottish women have been pressured by their government and members of the police force to deny the evidence of their eyes and ears, repudiate biological facts and embrace a neo-religious concept of gender that is unprovable and untestable. The re-definition of ‘woman’ to include every man who declares himself one has already had serious consequences for women’s and girls’ rights and safety in Scotland, with the strongest impact felt, as ever, by the most vulnerable, including female prisoners and rape survivors. It is impossible to accurately describe or tackle the reality of violence and sexual violence committed against women and girls, or address the current assault on women’s and girls’ rights, unless we are allowed to call a man a man. Freedom of speech and belief are at an end in Scotland if the accurate description of biological sex is deemed criminal. I’m currently out of the country, but if what I’ve written here qualifies as an offence under the terms of the new act, I look forward to being arrested when I return to the birthplace of the Scottish Enlightenment. If you agree with the views set out in this tweet, please retweet it.

#ArrestMe #AprilFools #HateCrimeActScotland

I expect I’ll be retweeting it all day, and that everyone else will too.

But don’t worry, you have nothing to fret about, unless…

Yes but sir, you and your friends consider it “threatening” and “abusive” and “stirring up hatred” to say that men are not women. That means women in the UK have everything to worry about.

You smug fucking idiot.

Day one of Scotland’s heightened war on women:

JK Rowling could be investigated by police for misgendering trans people under Scotland’s new hate crime legislation, an SNP minister has admitted. Siobhian Brown, the SNP’s community safety minister, initially stated that misgendering – for example calling a trans woman “he” – would “not at all” fall foul of the legislation. But after being challenged over calls for JK Rowling to be prosecuted under the Hate Crime and Public Order (Scotland) Act, she then admitted it would be for the police to decide.

Speaking as the Act came into force on Monday, Ms Brown said: “It could be reported and it could be investigated. Whether or not the police would think it was criminal is up to Police Scotland for that.”

Ah yes – pass an insane law criminalizing women who object to laws that criminalize women, and then say it’s up to the poleees to decide which women are actually criminals.

The minister was also challenged over the “odd” omission of women from the list of protected groups included in the legislation. This means that threats made against Rowling and other feminists critical of trans ideology could not be investigated under the Bill. Ms Brown admitted “more work needs to be done” and said a misogyny Bill would be introduced.

Point missed. Why were women ignored in the first place? Why did you abject fucking tools pass a law making it a crime to say men are not women while ignoring the things trans “activists” say about women every minute of every day?

The new legislation covers hatred on the basis of age, disability, race, religion, sexual orientation and transgender identity.

However, an amendment to add sex to the list of protected characteristics at this stage was voted down, despite cross-party MSPs raising concerns about why women were excluded.

What does that tell us?

Nothing good.

Trump’s lovely message for today:

HAPPY EASTER TO ALL, INCLUDING CROOKED AND CORRUPT PROSECUTORS AND JUDGES THAT ARE DOING EVERYTHING POSSIBLE TO INTERFERE WITH THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION OF 2024, AND PUT ME IN PRISON, INCLUDING THOSE MANY PEOPLE THAT I COMPLETELY & TOTALLY DESPISE BECAUSE THEY WANT TO DESTROY AMERICA, A NOW FAILING NATION, LIKE “DERANGED” JACK SMITH, WHO IS EVIL AND “SICK,” MRS. FANI “FAUNI” WADE, WHO SAID SHE HARDLY KNEW THE “SPECIAL” PROSECUTOR, ONLY TO FIND THAT HE SPENT YEARS “LOVING” HER, LONG BEFORE THE GEORGIA PERSECUTION OF PRESIDENT TRUMP BEGAN (AND THEREBY MAKING THE CASE AGAINST ME NULL, VOID, AND ILLEGAL!), AND LAZY ON VIOLENT CRIME ALVIN BRAGG WHO, WITH CROOKED JOE’S DOJ THUGS, UNFAIRLY WORKING IN THE D.A.’s OFFICE, ILLEGALLY INDICTED ME ON A CASE HE NEVER WANTED TO BRING AND VIRTUALLY ALL LEGAL SCHOLARS SAY IS A CASE THAT SHOULD NOT BE BROUGHT, IS BREAKING THE LAW IN DOING SO (POMERANTZ!), WAS TURNED DOWN BY ALL OTHER LAW ENFORCEMENT AUTHORITIES, AND IS NOT A CRIME. HAPPY EASTER EVERYONE!

Notable fact: that’s all one sentence.

Also note that he says happy easter including to all those many people he completely and totally despises.

Send the personalized meteor soon.

Gosh, I remember when NOW was a feminist organization. Now it’s all about men, and telling women to do what men tell them.

How is it white supremacy? What does it even have to do with white supremacy?

As for patriarchy – no, NationalNOW, what’s patriarchy is lying through your teeth about women who refuse to sign up to a religion that deifies men who say they are women. You’re the ones who are going belly-up for men; we are saying No.

What could go wrong?

Degrees in homoeopathy, computer science, English literature and human resources are being accepted as entry qualifications to train to become a physician associate, the Daily Telegraph can reveal.

The NHS is rolling out a mass expansion in the use of such workers, despite concerns that patients are being put at risk by workers with insufficient training.

And not just insufficient but QUACK. No one with a degree in homeopathy should be anywhere near the NHS.

The figures for 2021 to 2023 show Anglia Ruskin University in Cambridge accepted two students with degrees in homoeopathic medicine, while Bournemouth University accepted degrees in anthropology, nutrition and computer systems engineering.

There’s no such thing as “homeopathic medicine.” Homeopathy is dilution, not medicine. Dilution is not a form of medicine.

Physician associates are supposed to share some of the duties performed by doctors, including taking medical histories, examining patients, making diagnoses and analysing test results. However, they are supposed to work under the supervision of a doctor at all times. In recent years, there has been growing concern that the workers are being used to do tasks which require a fully qualified doctor.

The concerns have deepened since the death of Emily Chesterton, 30, from Salford, who died after two appointments with a physician associate whom she believed was a GP. Ms Chesterton consulted the Vale Practice surgery in north London on October 31, 2022. Her symptoms included calf pain, a swollen and hot leg, shortness of breath and she was finding it increasingly difficult to walk. 

The young actress believed she had been seen by a GP – but instead, a physician associate prescribed her propranolol medication for anxiety.

Seriously? I have no medical training whatsoever but if I had those symptoms I would think I had a dangerous raging infection and needed to get to the emergency room.

Originally a comment by Your Name’s not Bruce? on If colleagues object.

A set of ONS resources on “Gender Identity and Transitioning at Work” …

Is there any other hobby/delusion/fetish that has government departments drawing up resource packages so that employees in it can do so in the workplace? Do Furries get special breaks in order to be taken outside by their colleagues for “walkies”? Do men who enjoy being treated like babies have other staff members feed them and change their diapers? Why is one group of fetishists pandered to but not others? Have we found a specimen of Trans Privilege in the wild, after having been assured that no such creature exists?

Male use of women’s single sex facilities falls right in line with the “needs” of the other fetishists noted above. Each is an imposition that forces women to become participants, whether they want to or not, in some man’s sexual fantasy. Transgenderism is no different, except that it is being given the red carpet treatment by ONS management. If their union is all in with gender ideology, then these women have no-one but themselves and each other to rely upon in resisting this unreasonable demand; “their” union will join with management (and their “trans siblings”) in punishing them. Very solidarity. At this point these women are no longer considered “colleagues” and fellow employees, but are now relegated to being props, backdrops, extras, and audience for the man’s performance of “femininity.” I’m sure that the women in the ONS had no idea that when they joined the service, they were also going to be working in the theatre.

World to Scotland: you can’t police us all.

An English barrister will challenge the Scottish government’s “attempt to police the world” by flouting the Hate Crime and Public Order (Scotland) Act when it comes into force on Monday.

Sarah Phillimore, a child protection lawyer and advocate of women’s sex-based rights, ridiculed Scotland’s “insane” new legislation which could have extraterritorial powers to prosecute crimes perceived as stirring up hatred.

“It’s not just that it’s a really bad law, it’s the fact that we are two countries right next to each other, and there’s the internet,” said Phillimore, who has offices in London and Bristol.

“What does Scotland think it’s going to do? Police the world? I was shocked to discover that if a thing is read in Scotland, it’s considered published in Scotland. People are going to go hell for leather on April 1 and actively invite the police to extradite us, just hoping to overwhelm the system and show how ridiculous this is.”

Especially at a time when the police and even the state consider it a crime to say that a man is not a woman.

The fears expressed by Fair Cop were raised last week after it emerged that a social media post by Murdo Fraser, the Scottish Conservative MSP, had been logged as a non-crime hate incident by officers, an action he described as “disproportionate, discriminatory, intrusive, irrational and otherwise unlawful”.

Fraser was reported by a member of the public in November after he shared a post on Twitter/X which was critical of the Scottish government’s “nonbinary action plan” and said “choosing to identify as non-binary is as valid as choosing to identify as a cat”.

Or a table, or a giraffe, or Delaware, or rain, or an engineer.

Concern has been raised because Police Scotland’s enhanced disclosure programme means that prospective employers can request criminal history information on any person. This can include unspent convictions, relevant spent convictions, information from the sex offenders register and other relevant information held by police. This last category would include non-crime hate incidents.

And of course “non-crime hate incidents” very much include saying that men are not women.

While the Hate Crime and Public Order (Scotland) Act brings many areas of Scottish law broadly in line with legislation in England and Wales, there is belief that Police Scotland’s “victim-led” approach will penalise people who refuse to accept opinions such as “transwomen are women”, advanced by Stonewall, Scottish Trans and campaign groups part-funded by the Scottish government.

That belief is based on various actions of Police Scotland over the past few years. It’s not random.

Institutional capture:

Women working for the Office for National Statistics could face disciplinary action if they object to male-born colleagues using single-sex lavatories and changing rooms, documents leaked to The Sunday Telegraph reveal.

News flash: male-born=male. There are no male-born women. If yer born male you stay male, just as if yer born human you stay human.

A set of ONS resources on “Gender Identity and Transitioning at Work” includes a manager’s checklist for supporting a transitioning employee with a section headed “use of single-sex facilities”. It says: “Have you agreed when the employee will start to use single-sex facilities, such as toilets and changing rooms, appropriate to their acquired gender? This will usually be on the first day of transition.”

The document says that “if colleagues object to sharing facilities with employees going through transition, the situation should be dealt with through communication, discussion and education. If colleagues persist with unreasonable objections you may need to manage the situation via grievance or disciplinary procedures.”

Women objecting to sharing toilets with men are being “unreasonable” and must be forced to obey. Women’s safety and privacy don’t matter; all that matters is the man’s obvious human right to force himself on women in all places under all circumstances. Men matter; women are garbage.

Sex Matters, a gender-critical campaign group that has reviewed the ONS documents, said the policies showed the organisation had “complete disregard for all other employees”.

…

Fiona McAnena, Sex Matters’ director of campaigns, said: “The ONS staff documents that have been leaked are inaccurate, ideologically driven and inflammatory. This is what institutional capture looks like.” She added: “These documents would be a cause for concern in any public sector body. That they come from within the national statistics body helps explain why the ONS made such a mess of the census questions on sex and ‘gender identity’.”

Clever move, gobbling up the statistics branch.

Trump inciting violence:

President Joe Biden’s campaign on Saturday excoriated former President Donald Trump for sharing a video on social media depicting what appears to be an image of Biden tied up and kidnapped in the back of a pickup truck.

“This image from Donald Trump is the type of crap you post when you’re calling for a bloodbath or when you tell the Proud Boys to ‘stand back and stand by,'” Biden campaign communications director Michael Tyler said in a statement to ABC News.

It’s also just childish. He’s both a clown and a deadly peril.