A condition

Jan 20th, 2019 4:34 pm | By

This seems strange. It’s an entry on the NHS website, under the subhead Conditions, for Gender Dysphoria. Most of the conditions under that subhead are quite medical – you know, sciencey. The GD one isn’t so much.

Gender dysphoria is a condition where a person experiences discomfort or distress because there’s a mismatch between their biological sex and gender identity. It’s sometimes known as gender incongruence.

Biological sex is assigned at birth, depending on the appearance of the genitals. Gender identity is the gender that a person “identifies” with or feels themselves to be.

That, for instance. Notice the scare quotes on “identifies” – yes quite, so why use it? Identifying with something isn’t a medical term. What it means to identify with a gender is hotly contested and not a settled scientific or technical description.

This mismatch between sex and gender identity can lead to distressing and uncomfortable feelings that are called gender dysphoria. Gender dysphoria is a recognised medical condition, for which treatment is sometimes appropriate. It’s not a mental illness.

Recognised by whom? Medical condition in what sense? How can it be confirmed or falsified? How is it not a mental illness? How is “identifying as” anything but mental?

It’s just…weird, seeing all this politicized, contentious, dubious stuff on a governmental information site.

The first signs of gender dysphoria can appear at a very young age. For example, a child may refuse to wear typical boys’ or girls’ clothes, or dislike taking part in typical boys’ or girls’ games and activities.

Well there you go then. Little Sally likes to climb trees and hates dresses, therefore she has a medical condition called Gender Dysphoria. They’re from the government and they’re here to help.



Look over there

Jan 20th, 2019 1:06 pm | By

Lawyers and tv explainers Joyce Vance and Mimi Rocah explain what Rudy Giuliani is up to. (Spoiler: it’s not lawyering.)

During an interview with CNN’s Chris Cuomo on Wednesday night, Rudy Giuliani, President Donald Trump’s personal lawyer, seemed to acknowledge that there was collusion between one or more people involved in the Trump campaign and Russia — but just not involving his client, President Trump. Giuliani, who, along with Trump, has spent the last year telling the public that there has been no collusion, suddenly shifted gears and claimed he “never said there was no collusion between the campaign or between people in the campaign” only that there was “no collusion” on the part of “the president of the United States.”

Now why would he do that. Hmm. Oh, I know! If there is about to be news that there was collusion.

Let’s be clear, Giuliani’s conversation with Cuomo does not represent a subtle, nuanced shift in position. This is an admission by the president’s lawyer that when the president said “no collusion” and when he himself claimed there was no collusion by anyone, let alone “the top four or five people in the campaign,” they were not telling the truth.

Of course, if the position had always been that maybe there was collusion, but Trump wasn’t involved, the response to the special counsel’s investigation would have been to fully cooperate. Any rational leader in this position would want to know who the bad actors were in his or her campaign. But that was not the response, because that has not been the position — until now.

Which seems surprising in a former prosecutor, but Giuliani isn’t wearing his lawyer hat these days.

Giuliani is technically Trump’s lawyer. But the strategy he has been running since he joined the team in April 2018 is a political one, not a legal one. None of what he does is meant to convince a judge or a jury. It is meant to confuse the issues, to inoculate people against shocking news before it arrives, and to retain the president’s good standing with his base.

He’s not doing law, he’s doing PR, using his lawyer hat to make it more convincing. Nothing sleazy there at all.

Giuliani’s “defense strategy” for Trump has morphed over time, in response to evidence he and Trump’s other legal advisors could not refute, from 1) there were no contacts with Russians during the campaign, to 2) there were no election-related contacts with the Russians, to 3) there may have been contacts but it wasn’t collusion, to 4) collusion isn’t a crime, to 5) even if there was collusion and even if it was a crime, Trump himself didn’t participate or know anything about it.

Which would be sort of funny, if Trump weren’t…you know.



A fate worse than…

Jan 20th, 2019 12:23 pm | By

Andy Lewis, Le canard noir, tweeted an interesting letter:

Can you read it? Don’t forget to zoom in if it’s difficult.

The first point is that puberty blockers leave the young person in developmental limbo, without the pubertal hormones or secondary sexual characteristic that would tend to consolidate gender identity. One particular puberty blocker “promotes a continued desire to identify with the non-birth sex” while 73 to 88% of GD patients who don’t get blockers “eventually lose their desire to identify with the non-birth sex.”

What caught my attention there is the fact that that loss of desire to identify with the non-birth sex is seen by trans activists as a surrender, a loss, a cop-out, a capitulation to…some equivalent of The Bosses, The Man, The Power. But…why? Why is it seen as more woke to cling to GD than to wait a few years to see if it wouldn’t be easier and simpler just to go with it and fight the sexist stereotypes without surgery and lifelong meds?

It seems like dysphoria at existing at all, or at maturing. There are difficulties in all that, obviously, but Resistance is Futile. We can’t stay 15 or 20 forever, so what about accepting that and moving on and doing something useful? Just a thought.



Packets of anti-feminist literature

Jan 20th, 2019 10:56 am | By

Meanwhile in South Carolina

A request to hang a group photo of the General Assembly’s female lawmakers in the State House led to an uncomfortable debate Tuesday in which a pro-life activist urged lawmakers not to endorse such symbols of “destructive and evil” feminism.

The 10-member State House Committee, made up of nine men and one woman, rebuked Columbia Christians for Life director Steve Lefemine, shutting down his testimony after three minutes.

Jeez, a guy can’t even testify about how evil feminism is any more, it’s political correctness gone mad.

By then, Lefemine had passed out packets of anti-feminist literature, expressed his view that the Bible says women are not fit for public office, and read aloud from an article titled, “The Feminism of the Mothers is the Destruction of the Daughters.”

It’s all because of his last name. He’s an embittered man.



This behavior is opposed to the Church’s teachings

Jan 20th, 2019 10:39 am | By

So we’re seeing play out yet another example of “religion is thought to make people better but guess what IT DOESN’T (necessarily).”

The entitled young male shits who bullied Nathan Phillips are all students at a Catholic boys’ school, so that doesn’t speak very well for how Catholic boys’ schools educate their boys, does it. Teaching basic decency isn’t really the role of schools, and probably shouldn’t be, but at the same time, schools by their nature collect children together into a small space for hours every day, so in that sense teaching / enforcing basic decency is their responsibility. They have a responsibility to see to it that the students don’t brutalize each other, which means they have a duty to convey to the students that brutalizing people is not ok; there’s your basic morality right there.

The reporting I’m seeing is that CovCath (as they call it) is notorious for being a swamp of entitled bullying shits. What does that remind me of? Oh yes, Brett Kavanaugh’s school, and Brett Kavanaugh himself, and Brett Kavanaugh’s entitled bullying shits of friends.

Could this be a common pattern?

Easily. Why? Because one thing religion does is make people think they’re better than people not inside the magic religious circle. Those bullies from CovCath were in Washington to advocate for making women prisoners of their own bodies; they were there to campaign for taking away the rights of people who are not like them – people who are not male. No doubt they have all been carefully trained to think and say they’re there to Rescue the Fetus, but that’s gilding. They can’t Rescue the Fetus without forcing the fetus’s host to continue hosting it – inside her body – against her will. They’re campaigning for a law to compel all women who get pregnant to continue being pregnant whether they want to or not. They’re campaigning to take a basic right to bodily autonomy away from the half of humanity that they are not. That’s a bully move in itself. It’s a bully move when the pope does it and it’s a bully move when they do it.

The Catholic Conference of Kentucky has a statement put out by the school and the diocese (they don’t want us to forget that this is all Catholic business – ok then, we won’t):

The Diocese of Covington and Covington Catholic High School have issued the following statement:

We condemn the actions of the Covington Catholic High School students towards Nathan Phillips specifically, and Native Americans in general, Jan. 18, after the March for Life, in Washington, D.C. We extend our deepest apologies to Mr. Phillips. This behavior is opposed to the Church’s teachings on the dignity and respect of the human person.

The matter is being investigated and we will take appropriate action, up to and including expulsion.

We know this incident also has tainted the entire witness of the March for Life and express our most sincere apologies to all those who attended the March and all those who support the pro-life movement.

They mean the anti-women’s rights movement, the take women’s bodily autonomy away movement.

Which raises the question – what do they mean “the Church’s teachings on the dignity and respect of the human person”? What teachings? Is that what Catholicism is all about? Has it ever been?

I say cut the bullshit. Catholicism historically was all about what shit humans are and how far they fall short of the glory of god. The duality was central. “You are fallen and wicked; God alone is great”: that was the Church’s Teaching for most of its history. They put it a little more gently now, but only a little, and the emphasis is on obedience and submission, not dignity and respect.

There are of course many Catholics and other believers who are better than that, and who filter out the cruel oppressive stuff to make a church and ideology to match. But don’t go thinking Catholic schools as such teach their students “first, do no harm” or anything like it.



The order of the smirk

Jan 19th, 2019 2:43 pm | By

Updating to add: see the competing account by the kid in the cap.

More on the high school bullies who mobbed a Native American drummer in DC yesterday.

The images in a series of videos that went viral on social media Saturday showed a tense scene near the Lincoln Memorial.

In them, a Native American man steadily beats his drum at the tail end of Friday’s Indigenous Peoples March while singing a song of unity for indigenous people to “be strong” in the face of the ravages of colonialism that now include police brutality, poor access to health care and the ill effects of climate change on reservations.

Surrounding him are a throng of young, mostly white teenage boys, several wearing Make America Great Again caps, with one standing about a foot from the drummer’s face wearing a relentless smirk.

It’s the bro smirk, the smirk of dominance. Trump smirks a lot.

Nathan Phillips, a veteran in the indigenous rights movement, was that man in the middle.

In an interview Saturday, Phillips, 64, said he felt threatened by the teens and that they suddenly swarmed around him as and other activists were wrapping up the march and preparing to leave.

The teenagers started chanting “Build that wall” and Phillips decided to get out of there.

“It was getting ugly, and I was thinking: ‘I’ve got to find myself an exit out of this situation and finish my song at the Lincoln Memorial,’ ” Phillips recalled. “I started going that way, and that guy in the hat stood in my way and we were at an impasse. He just blocked my way and wouldn’t allow me to retreat.”

The encounter generated a wave of outrage on social media less than a week after President Trump made light of the 1890 Wounded Knee massacre of several hundred Lakota Indians by the U.S. Cavalry in a tweet that was meant to mock Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D), who Trump derisively calls “Pocahontas.”

Oh did he. I missed that.

Yes he did.

Some of the teens in the video wore sweatshirts from Covington Catholic High School in Park Hills, Ky., which sent students to Washington to participate in Friday’s antiabortion March for Life event, according to an archived page of the school’s website that was taken down on Saturday.

Well, you know, they were probably on a high from marching to take women’s rights away, so they felt like celebrating by threatening another subordinate group. Kid Smirk thinks he’s going to inherit the world and maybe he will, maybe he’ll be another Brett Cavanaugh. Cavanaugh too is a woman-humiliating boy from Catholic school. They go far.



Damp squib

Jan 19th, 2019 2:20 pm | By

Trump made his stupid “announcement.” He’ll extend DACA for awhile if he gets the 5 billion for Wall. No one took the bait.

Trump had indicated for weeks that he would not entertain an extension of DACA, which began in 2012 under President Obama and has offered renewable work permits to immigrants, known as “Dreamers,” who entered the country illegally as children. Trump had said he was hoping the Supreme Court would hear an appeal to a lower court’s injunction on his attempt to end DACA and, if the high court ruled in his favor, that ending the program would give him more leverage in talks with Democrats over the future of the Dreamers.

But the Supreme Court signaled Friday that it might not take the case. That would mean that Trump would remain unable to end DACA, which covers about 700,000 immigrants, and some Dreamer groups have called on Democrats not to cut a deal for the wall.

He’s some deal-maker all right.



Nocturnal

Jan 19th, 2019 1:42 pm | By

Image may contain: text

Via Bad Cat.



A sea of racist hats

Jan 19th, 2019 11:29 am | By

Boys will be boys. White boys will be white boys. Racist white boys will be racist white boys. Racist white boys from all-boy Catholic high schools will be racist shits, apparently.

Covington Catholic High School faced backlash on social media Saturday morning after video was posted and widely shared showing a tense incident involving indigenous marchers and a group of young men in Washington, D.C.

The video shows a young man wearing a “Make America Great Again” cap standing near and staring at a man who is drumming as other young men surrounding them cheer and chant. Some of the onlookers appear to wear clothing bearing insignia from Covington Catholic High School in Park Hills.

Covington Catholic High School is in Kentucky, near Cincinatti.

https://twitter.com/lulu_says2/status/1086552871674368001

The man with the drum was participating in an Indigenous Peoples March, according to people who posted about the incident.

The boys from the Catholic school were there for the anti-women’s rights march. Of course they were. “Pro-life” my ass.



Oh my, that’s offensive

Jan 19th, 2019 9:23 am | By

Pence is Offended. Deeply Offended. Profoundly Offended.

It’s about this Christian Skool where his wife has taken a job.

“My wife and I have been in the public eye for quite a while. We’re used to the criticism,” Pence said in an interview with Eternal Word Television Network. “But I have to tell you, to see major news organizations attacking Christian education, is deeply offensive to us.

“We have a rich tradition in America of Christian education and, frankly, religious education broadly defined. We celebrate it. The freedom of religion is enshrined in the Constitution of the United States. The Constitution prohibits a religious test for holding a public office and so we’ll let the other critics roll off our back, but this criticism of Christian education in America should stop.”

Ah but what kind of “religious education” and “Christian education”? It depends, doesn’t it. There’s also the fact that constitutional freedom of religion does not mean that religion is or should be shielded from all criticism. It’s legal for Karen Pence to teach in a Christian school, even a homophobic fundamentalist Christian school, but that doesn’t mean we can’t criticize her choice.



No details

Jan 19th, 2019 9:11 am | By

Paul Farhi at the Post:

The fact that the normally buttoned-up special counsel’s office felt compelled to issue a statement suggests that the story’s conclusions were too baldly stated and too consequential to stay unchallenged. In effect, Mueller’s office seemed to be saying that BuzzFeed went too far and got some things wrong, though it did not say how or what.

In fact, what it didn’t say was important, too. It didn’t say Mueller had no evidence that Trump had sought to influence Cohen — just that BuzzFeed’s description of such statements was inaccurate. Nor did it spell out which reported statements were inaccurate and in what way. Further, it offered no details about how BuzzFeed had mischaracterized any evidence that Mueller has collected.

In short, they were cryptic, which is not surprising.

BuzzFeed is hanging out there though.

Right or wrong, BuzzFeed has been in the uncomfortable position of being alone on its Cohen story. No other news organization has confirmed or duplicated the story through its own reporting since BuzzFeed published it — typically a bad sign for the veracity of any reported allegation, as scoops are often matched within hours when a major story breaks.

Under Smith’s tenure, BuzzFeed News has split from the main BuzzFeed site and become a source of serious investigative journalism and political reporting. Its series on assassinations of people opposed to Russian President Vladimir Putin was a finalist for the Pulitzer Prize last year.

We await developments.



Monkey wrench

Jan 18th, 2019 5:09 pm | By

They never talk. They talked.

https://twitter.com/AdamSerwer/status/1086424301765574661

In other words they’re saying they didn’t leak anything?



Thud

Jan 18th, 2019 5:01 pm | By

Oh  now what?

https://twitter.com/Susan_Hennessey/status/1086424956672622592



Trump on the majesty of God’s creation

Jan 18th, 2019 3:34 pm | By

Fresh from his attempts to get Congressional Democrats killed, Trump made a “surprise” video appearance at the pro-forced birth rally in DC today.

“When we look into the eyes of a newborn child, we see the beauty and the human soul and the majesty of God’s creation. We know that every life has meaning,” Trump said in his video, before listing his administration’s antiabortion actions and vowing to reject any legislation passed by the new Democratic-controlled House that “weakens” the campaign to prevent abortion access.

How would he know? He never has looked into the eyes of a newborn child; he has bragged about taking no care of his children when they were small, because that’s for bitches. Also “majesty of God’s creation” my ass. He doesn’t mean a word of that, somebody wrote it down for him and he said it in his head-jerking wheezing puppet way.

Meanwhile he’s still a crook.



The Administration leaked the commercial travel plans

Jan 18th, 2019 12:06 pm | By

Meanwhile Trump outdid himself in the Disgusting Prize competition. Nancy Pelosi’s spokesperson followed his race around the track.

They exposed the plan to travel via commercial flights. Trump’s petty rancid ego is more important to them than the safety of members of Congress doing their job in a danger zone. It’s astounding.

He should be impeached, arrested, and pushed into a vat of fermenting elephant dung, with high walls and no ladder.



Wolves are howling a hundred miles away

Jan 18th, 2019 11:13 am | By

He’s taking it well.



Multiple sources

Jan 18th, 2019 10:49 am | By

Okay so this is interesting – BuzzFeed reports that (Mueller has found that) Trump told Cohen to lie to Congress.

Oops.

Chris Cillizza at CNN:

For much of the past 20 months, President Donald Trump and his administration have insisted that, for all of the smoke surrounding his 2016 campaign, there was no fire. A lot of people in Trump’s orbit engaging in conversations and relationships with Russian officials, but no evidence of collusion and certainly nothing that linked Donald Trump to any wrongdoing.

That very well might have changed Thursday night, with this report from BuzzFeed:

“President Donald Trump directed his longtime attorney Michael Cohen to lie to Congress about negotiations to build a Trump Tower in Moscow, according to two federal law enforcement officials involved in an investigation of the matter.”

Oops.

The BuzzFeed story also claims that Cohen confirmed this information to special counsel Robert Mueller after “the special counsel’s office learned about Trump’s directive for Cohen to lie to Congress through interviews with multiple witnesses from the Trump Organization and internal company emails, text messages, and a cache of other documents.”

It’s hard to overstate what a big deal that is. No other major outlets have confirmed the BuzzFeed report. But if the BuzzFeed report is right, then the President of the United States directed an underling to lie under oath — which is, in and of itself, a crime.

And there are multiple sources – it’s not all Cohen, it’s also witnesses from the Trump Organization and internal company emails, text messages, and a cache of other documents. Giuliani can tell Fox News that Cohen is a liar until he’s purple in the face but it won’t matter because Cohen is not the only source.

“If true — and proof must be examined — Congress must begin impeachment proceedings and Barr must refer, at a minimum, the relevant portions of material discovered by Mueller,” tweeted former Attorney General Eric Holder. “This is a potential inflection point.”

Democratic Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse agreed, tweeting, “If this is true, this is plain, slam-dunk, criminal obstruction of justice (18 U.S.C. 1505, 1512), subornation of perjury (18 U.S.C. 1622), conspiracy (18 U.S.C. 371) and likely aiding and abetting perjury (18 U.S.C. 2).”

The “if true” part is, of course, the key. BuzzFeed has put the credibility of its entire organization on the line here. To make an allegation that the President of the United States purposely obstructed justice in an investigation into Russia’s attempts to interfere in a presidential election is a massive deal — and the sort of thing that, if wrong, can do irreparable damage to a company’s reputation.

But if the BuzzFeed article is right — and one of the reporters who bylined the story insisted on CNN Friday morning that the information in the piece is “rock solid” and that the sourcing “goes beyond” the two sources cited — then this is the smoking gun (or at least a smoking gun).

Oops.



In case you need some pointers

Jan 18th, 2019 9:44 am | By

The state of this.

https://twitter.com/alan_maguire/status/1086249796367724546

Graham Linehan was not cautioned. The police came by for a chat because a couple of the usual Robespierres told them to.

This kind helpful fella even offers the aspiring Robespierres a model email they can send to the police about a guy having opinions on the internet.

https://twitter.com/alan_maguire/status/1086260846420996096

Just imagine calling it “mutilation” to cut off healthy breasts or penises. “Gender confirmation surgery” is the correct ScienTific term and not at all loaded or political or shaped by a particular ideological fantasy. Similarly it is “height confirmation surgery” to have one’s healthy head or legs cut off.

And that nonsense is his only substantive point, the rest of it is all “inappropriate” and [unspecified] “harm” and “deserve” and “urge.” Censorship used to be made of sterner stuff.

An hour later, absurdly, he complained that Linehan had noticed.

Yes, it’s “a sad case” to notice some goon tweeting lies about you, but not at all a sad case to tweet lies about people in an effort to get tv networks to shun them.



California dreamin

Jan 18th, 2019 9:31 am | By

Golf balls. Didn’t think of that, didja.

Two years ago, a 16-year old diver named Alex Weber was swimming off Pebble Beach along the Pacific near Carmel, Calif. “My dad raised me underwater,” says Weber, and she means it. She’s a free diver: no scuba tanks; she just holds her breath. She was diving in a small cove and looked down and saw something weird. “You couldn’t see the sand,” she recalls, still sounding incredulous. “It was completely white.”

White with golf balls.

Pebble Beach isn’t near Carmel, it’s in Carmel – or, if you prefer, immediately adjacent to it, but both are small places. Of course Carmel is a town while Pebble Beach is a resort, but anyway, they’re cheek by jowl. You can walk up onto the golf course from Carmel Beach.

There were thousands of them. “It felt like a shot to the heart,” she says.

She was offended. Right then, she decided to haul them up. Thus began a Sisyphean task that went on for months: She and her father would haul hundreds of pounds of them up, and then of course more golfers would hit more into the ocean.

Not on purpose, but because the ocean is one big golf hazard. Pebble is a famous and popular course because it’s so challenging. All very well, but if they’re polluting the damn ocean, they should clean up after themselves.

Then she heard about a Stanford University scientist, Matt Savoca, who studied plastic waste in the ocean. She emailed him, and he came to look at her collection.

“Fifty thousand golf balls, just sitting in the garage,” she says.

Savoca was impressed. Weber recalls that he turned to her and said, ” ‘You should write a paper about this,’ and I was like, ‘Matt, I’m 16 years old. I don’t know how to write a scientific paper!’ “

So they worked together, which means he helped her haul tons of golf balls out of Carmel Bay. (It’s not the open ocean there, it’s a small bay; Carmel faces the bay and Pebble Beach is on the northern arm.)

Over two years, they found more than 50,000 golf balls. The source: five golf courses. Two along the coastline, and three up the Carmel River — those golf balls rolled underwater down the river to the ocean.

There are more than two along the coastline, so they weren’t even working the whole Monterey Peninsula. There are four Pebble Beach Company courses (or maybe 5, I’m not sure if Spyglass reaches the coast or not) and one municipal one. Lotta golf balls. Those other courses are on the open ocean, it’s only Pebble that’s on Carmel Bay.

In the journal Marine Pollution Bulletin,the team notes that golf balls are coated with a thin polyurethane shell that degrades over time. They also contain zinc compounds that are toxic. Savoca points out that the surf and currents act like a rock grinder and break down the golf balls. While chemicals from 50,000 or so golf balls will have only a small effect on the ocean, Savoca says they do degrade into microplastic pieces that marine animals could eat. The team also notes that there are lots of coastal golf courses around the world, so this may go beyond California.

Alex Weber, now 18 and a published author in a scientific journal, plans to apply to university to study marine science. In the meantime, she is still collecting, and keeping up her website. She says it is too bad the golf balls sink. If they floated, people would be shocked and outraged. “If a person could see what we see underwater,” she says, “it would not be acceptable.”

So what I want to know is, why aren’t the courses, or the parent company, simply required to clean up the golf balls? They make the big bucks by locating their courses on the ocean, so they can damn well clean up their toxic mess.



Trips to active war-zones are NEVER discussed in advance

Jan 17th, 2019 2:59 pm | By

The security breach aspect is getting attention.