Crimes

Jun 26th, 2019 4:10 pm | By

Trump is feeling bumptious today. He did a shout-fest with reporters on the driveway again today, in which he shouted that it was the Democrats who caused the drowning of Óscar Alberto Martínez Ramírez and his daughter Valeria on Monday.

Image result for oscar and valeria ramirez

Then he shouted that Mueller committed a crime.

Donald Trump, without offering evidence, on Wednesday directly accused former special counsel Robert Mueller of committing a crime, saying Mueller had illegally “terminated” FBI communications as part of his Russia investigation.

The Justice Department declined to comment.

“Mueller terminated them illegally. He terminated all of the emails. … Robert Mueller terminated their text messages together. He terminated them. They’re gone. And that’s illegal. That’s a crime,” Trump said in an interview with Fox Business Network, referring to two former Federal Bureau of Investigation employees who exchanged disparaging messages about the president.

Shall we talk about all the crimes – actual crimes, not notional ones – Donald Trump has committed? How many days do you have?



Malory Towers

Jun 26th, 2019 12:24 pm | By

All the tomboys are being converted into trans or enby.

Julie Bindel looks at a character of Enid Blyton’s who is getting the treatment:

When I was growing up in the 1960s and 70s, I took pleasure in rejecting feminine frippery such as frilly pink frills and girly shoes. I refused to have bows and ribbons in my hair, and I was not the only one in my friendship group that preferred dungarees to dresses.

I kept good company in a character from Enid Blyton, who was also a hard-core tomboy. Wilhelmina, better known as Bill, was the girl in Malory Towers – a series of books based on a fictitious all-girls boarding school, which chronicled the adventures of a group of friends getting up to high jinx.

A new stage version is now coming to the Bristol Old Vic, and has the Bill character played by a non-binary person. In today’s ‘woke’ parlance, non-binary, also known as genderqueer, is, according to Wikipedia, “a spectrum of gender identities that are not exclusively masculine or feminine—‌identities that are outside the gender-binary”.

I thought that’s what feminism had fought for? To not have to acquiesce to sexist stereotypes because we are female? Should we not simply be encouraging girls to reject the rules imposed upon them as to how they should behave? As the director of the new production, Emma Rice, says in the Telegraph today: “feminism is at the heart of Malory Towers”.

Why then can we not just celebrate Bill as a girl who refuses to bow to convention?

Because we’re too sick of being screamed at by woke Twitter?

Now I’m worrying that somebody is going to do it to Nancy Blackett of Swallows and Amazons. Come at me, bro.



Priss Jawwy’s plan

Jun 26th, 2019 11:22 am | By

Shallow Princess Ivanka’s shallow husband Shallow Prince Jared has a Plan for Peace in the Middle East, gleaned from his several years of experience renting overpriced apartments.

The Middle East Economic Plan, dubbed “Peace to Prosperity” is the brainchild of Jared Kushner, the son-in-law of US President Donald Trump. Its 136-pages read like a glossy magazine, with photos of children walking to school and smiling farmers adorning the document.

But the images come from USAID development projects that were stopped due to massive cuts imposed on the agency’s funding in the West Bank and Gaza.

Well…yes, but…the photos are meant to be of future children walking to school and smiling farmers. They’re not supposed to be documentation, they’re supposed to be inspiration. Like advertising! They don’t have to be true, they just have to motivate people to buy the product bullshit.

At Tuesday’s long-anticipated economic workshop in Manama, Bahrain, Kushner officially presented his plan as the “deal of the century.” The political part is set to follow, but no one actually knows when. It is not expected until after Israeli elections in September.

The project “Peace to Prosperity” is detailed in 40 pages, divided into three chapters. Some 96 pages summarize the programs, projects and statistics. The Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) described the plan as consisting of only “abstract promises.”

Which Prince Jared doesn’t have the power to deliver.

The first part of the plan outlines combatting corruption, opening up The West Bank and Gaza Strip to regional and global markets and connecting the two with a railway link. Yet Kushner’s proposal does not explain how something that has not happened for years will now materialize.

There are promises to strengthen the private sector and introduce 4G, LTE and 5G mobile networks. The latter doesn’t even exist yet in the US. The West Bank only acquired a 3G network in 2018 because the Israeli government finally allowed it, after many years of waiting.

According to Kushner’s vision, Gaza and the West Bank could, “just like Dubai and Singapore,” benefit from their strategic location to become a regional financial center.

But unlike the Palestinian territories, Dubai and Singapore have airports. The plan, instead, is to expand airports in neighboring Lebanon and Jordan.

Tsss, Deutsch Welle is being so literal. These are dreams, plans, slogans, aspirational fantasies. Get with the program!

Education is another theme in the proposal, which promises online education platforms and international exchanges.

But how Palestinians’ freedom of movement would be expanded and their travel restrictions loosened, remains to be seen. There are generations of people in the Gaza Strip who have never been allowed to leave the territory.

Kushner envisages investments in cultural institutions and a revamping of the health sector. But here too, there has been no indication of how to go about it.

What do they mean “how to go about it”? You just do it. Prince Jared says it and someone does it. Simple!

Although the economic plan is only meant to be implemented after a peace plan has been achieved, it is clear that Kushner’s vision does not include an independent Palestinian state.

US officials have already let it be known that the so-called two-state solution, which has been supported by numerous countries worldwide, has been rejected by the president’s son-in-law.

Why the president’s son-in-law has anything to do with it remains a mystery.



Then, she persisted to do the same things

Jun 26th, 2019 11:02 am | By

More from the “Stone the TERF JK Rowling!!” faction:

A heap of sludge from one Phaylen Fairchild (they do love those flattering neo-names, don’t they) at Medium:

It’s been a long time coming, but finally we have a definitive answer. JK Rowling is a TERF.

There have been multiple instances wherein the (in)famous Harry Potter author demonstrated solidarity with radical feminists who have waged a vicious smear campaign against transgender women.

Or not so much waged a vicious smear campaign as disagreed with, but you know, gotta fan the flames.

While the LGBT community and our allies have stood back and watched a rather ominous narrative form around JK Rowling, it has been without any direct confirmation or statement from the author herself. It’s as if she is conditioning the world to accept it rather than rebuke it. First she stuck her toe in the water, was caught, claimed it was a misunderstanding and we accepted that. Then, she persisted to do the same things… again and again.

She was “caught” – having her own opinion instead of prostrating herself before someone else’s. She “persisted” – as the US senator complained about Senator Warren when she wouldn’t stop talking simply because he told her to.

Finally, we have some confirmation of Rowling’s stance against the transgender community. She has followed one of the most hateful and aggressive anti-trans radical feminists on Twitter, Magdalen Berns.

Out of her 14 million followers, Rowling herself follows less than 700 people on social media, so it’s safe to presume her perspective aligns with that of the well known transphobe whose account is solely committed to espousing misinformation and dangerous rhetoric toward transgender women. This clearly isn’t another middle-aged moment. Instead, it seems more like Rowling unapologetically pulling back the curtain and finally ending what little left there was to speculate about with any optimism.

The terrible writing doesn’t help, but you get the idea.

There’s also an indignant public Facebook post:

so the question that you in no way need answered, that you probably weren’t thinking about at all until you saw this tweet, is:

“Is J.K. Rowling a terf?”

I just went through all the accounts she follows — it’s a pretty small list, under 700 — and here’s what I found.

Pause to admire the dedication, the altruism, the commitment it takes to investigate what accounts another person follows in search of evidence of…well, of following those accounts.

@/magdalenberns is a terf. her timeline is just crammed with anti-trans hostility.

@/damcou is a sneering transphobe. search “from:damcou trans”.

@/glosswitch speaks up in support of Bindel and believes that trans women are violent men.

@/hadleyfreeman, another bindel supporter, supports transphobes and transphobic causes while trying to claim she’s not a terf.

@/victoriapeckham is a high-profile terf who believes trans kids don’t really kill themselves all that often, and is incidentally a swerf as well

@/jolyonMaugham says trans women are women… except when any specific policy issue comes up, or self-ID, when he about-faces into ‘it’s complicated’ and ‘both sides’. search “from:jolyonmaugham trans”

@/claireshrugged thinks that trans women are ‘biologically male’ and cannot be lesbians.

Etc etc etc, with Jess Phillips and Frances Barber and Graham Linehan hauled in. Wrongfollow! Wrongfollow in the highest degree!

She’s a fucking terf. She has been all along. The only reason she hasn’t said so openly is that she wants to keep raking in LGBTQ fan dollars.

When you give her your money, you’re giving money to a terf. When you support her claims to being lgbtq positive, you’re providing rhetorical cover for a terf.

When you play the new harry potter game on your phone, you’re giving support and ad dollars to a terf.

You have been warned.



Smile for the cameras

Jun 26th, 2019 7:52 am | By

Princess Ivanka gives us commoners a glimpse into her rarefied royal life.

Will you look at that? Can you imagine a single other “senior adviser” issuing a glam shot of Self Entering The Chamber?

And then there’s the whole “what the hell do you know about it?” problem. What is that spoiled vain shallow fashion model doing prancing into the Senate and giving a “keynote” on a grab bag of subjects she has zero expertise in?

Also, as Joyce Vance points out, how dare she.



Get me protocol

Jun 25th, 2019 5:15 pm | By

More personnel turnover:

The Trump administration official in charge of diplomatic protocol plans to resign and isn’t going to Japan for this week’s Group of 20 meetings, where he would have played a sensitive behind-the-scenes role, according to people familiar with the matter.

Trump has a protocol boffin?? Who knew? He doesn’t seem to have been doing much of a job…

Sean Lawler, a State Department official whose title is chief of protocol, is departing amid a possible inspector general’s probe into accusations of intimidating staff and carrying a whip in the office, according to one of the people.

Ah. So Trump has a protocol boffin who carries a whip in the office. Makes sense.

The protocol chief assists the president on overseas trips, and when foreign leaders visit the White House, by making introductions and briefing the president on protocol. Lawler, a fixture in the Oval office during dignitaries’ visits, served as the president’s liaison to the diplomatic corps at the State Department.

Diplomatic fine points handled by the protocol chief include helping determine where to hold meetings and in what order participants should enter a room.

And which hand to hold the whip in.



Oooh she follows a wrongthinkist

Jun 25th, 2019 4:46 pm | By

More finger-pointing hissing venomous garbage from Pink News:

The Harry Potter author JK Rowling has been heavily criticised for following the “self-professed transphobe” YouTuber Magdalen Berns on Twitter.

Berns has uploaded numerous anti-trans videos to YouTube with titles including, “There is no such thing as a lesbian with a penis,” “Gender is NOT a social construct,” and “Non binary bullshit.”

Berns has also called for people to stop using the term TERF (trans exclusionary radical feminist), saying it is an attack on free speech.

Berns is a hero. You regular readers here got to know about her well before her videos made her famous. I wrote about her back in October 2015 when she was running in an Edinburgh University Student Association election and people were calling her “whorephobic” for the usual backassward reason. We chatted a lot; I think she’s brilliant. These days she’s dealing with a lethal brain tumor, so Pink News could have decided not to throw any mud on her, but no, of course not, it wouldn’t do to miss a chance to try to punish her some more.

Rowling’s following of the account was discovered by pro-transgender account Trans Advocate, who tweeted a screenshot and noted that Rowling had followed Berns during Pride month.

“Discovered” – as if it were a Mayan temple or how to cure brain tumors. Congratulations to Trans Advocate for searching out who follows whom in order to summon wrongdoers before the Inquisition.

The discovery was met with disappointment from many of Rowling’s fans, who say they cannot support the Harry Potter franchise if she shares Berns’ stance on transgender people.

I don’t think she’ll be giving any refunds.

PinkNews reached out to Rowling’s representatives for comment, and were told: “J.K. Rowling won’t be commenting. However, we know she follows on Twitter a wide range of people she finds interesting or thought-provoking.”

So fuck off and mind your own business you creepy little wannabe cops.



Only be sure always to call it please “research”

Jun 25th, 2019 12:15 pm | By

But have you done the RESEARCH? Where is your RESEARCH?

That’s how you do RESEARCH. You read an article in Jezebel and a thread on Twitter. That’s RESEARCH.

She’s a bizarre character, Dr. Dorothy Kim. She has an…impoverished vocabulary, to put it politely, and she’s free with the epithets. She’s also an academic, in the English department at Brandeis.

“Violent misgendering” – what’s that when it’s at home? How can the made up faux pas of “misgendering” possibly be violent?

She reported me to the authorities yesterday. I don’t think they paid any attention.



The rich pay to escape

Jun 25th, 2019 11:39 am | By

Obvious but worth reminding us:

A UN expert has warned of a possible “climate apartheid”, where the rich pay to escape from hunger, “while the rest of the world is left to suffer”.

It seems more inevitable than possible. Remember the hours-long queues for water in Chennai? It’s clear how money would make a difference in that scenario. Money pays people to stand in the queue for you, money pays for bottled water, money can get you out of Chennai altogether.

A key warning was that the world’s poor are likely to be hardest hit by rising temperatures – and the potential food shortages and conflict that could accompany such a change.

Developing nations are expected to suffer at least 75% of the costs of climate change – despite the fact that the poorer half of the world’s population generate just 10% of emissions.

“Sombre speeches by government officials at regular conferences are not leading to meaningful action,” Mr Alston wrote in a scathing put-down of current policy. “Thirty years of conventions appear to have done very little.”

Among those coming in for criticism are Brazil’s President Jair Bolsonaro, for opening up the rainforest to mining, and “weakening” environmental protections.

US President Donald Trump also comes under fire – for placing “former lobbyists in oversight roles”, “actively silencing and obfuscating climate science”, and also rolling back environmental protections.

Not if but when.



Ultimately harmful to her cause

Jun 25th, 2019 11:17 am | By

Ignore this important book by Caroline Criado-Perez because she is, always please remember, a TERF. It doesn’t matter how important the book is, what matters is terfitude. Failure to center trans people in everything is worse than genocide. It’s the worst worst thing of all time, bar none.

https://twitter.com/arthur_affect/status/1143210088980598784

Also the subject couldn’t possibly be what the author says it is, it has to be a sinister (however invisible) point about trans people.

https://twitter.com/arthur_affect/status/1143293407147655168

That will happen because I, Arthur Chu, will do my best to make it happen by trying to alert everyone on Twitter to my claim that CCP is a TERF. Look at all the good I do.



Including those who happen to be transgender

Jun 25th, 2019 10:14 am | By

The ACLU of Connecticut is digging in.

From the statement:

We, the undersigned Connecticut-based organizations committed to women’s rights and gender justice, support the full inclusion of transgender people in athletics. We are in solidarity with Andraya Yearwood, Terry Miller, and all other transgender student athletes in the Constitution State. As organizations that care deeply about ending discrimination against women and girls, we support laws and policies that protect transgender people from discrimination, including in participation in sports.

Together, we reject unfounded fears about transgender athletes in our state and reject the suggestion that cisgender women and girls benefit from the exclusion of women and girls who happen to be transgender. Instead, we recognize that all women and girls are harmed when some are denied opportunities to participate in sports because of stereotypes and fear.We proudly celebrate Andraya, Terry, and other transgender Connecticut athletes.

So…they simply assert that women and girls lose out when men and boys are not allowed to compete against them in otherwise sex-segregated sports. They don’t explain how or why that’s the case, they just announce it.

They also resort to tortuous backward wording to do so. The claim is not that women and girls “benefit from the exclusion of women and girls who happen to be transgender.” The claim is that women and girls are harmed by the inclusion of men and boys who claim to be transgender. Note that one issue here is that we don’t actually even know if Yearwood and Miller really are trans or if they’re just temporarily trans for the purpose of winning a bunch of high school races. I strongly suspect it’s the latter. I doubt that they really do “happen to be” transgender, as the statement so smarmily puts it; I think they may well be pretending to be transgender with all due deliberation.

We proudly celebrate Andraya, Terry, and other transgender Connecticut athletes. We applaud the parents, teammates, coaches, athletic directors, school administrators, and others who have welcomed transgender athletes with encouragement and respect. And we fully support Connecticut laws and policies designed to protect equal access to athletics for all women and girls, including those who happen to be transgender.

That’s all it takes, then – just keep talking about “all women and girls” meaning including men and boys who call themselves women and girls. Just ignore the fact that trans women and girls are not literally women and girls in the sense that literal women and girls are; just keep repeating the lie over and over and over again until everyone sees the same number of lights…Only that will be never. (Repeating the “happen to be” is meant to coach us to think of it as a tiny, trivial, meaningless attribute, as opposed to the difference between literally being of this sex not that one, and claiming to.)

There are three more paragraphs of similar bilge, all equally unconvincing.

Image result for 1984 2+2=5



She had stopped thriving

Jun 24th, 2019 5:41 pm | By

“Well why didn’t you say so?”

Border Patrol and the Trump administration are shocked, shocked, to hear of the horrific conditions at the Clint Facility. They had no idea. They have moved 300 children to the nearest Trump hotel.

Not really. They’ve been taken to a tent facility. In Texas. So that will be a huge improvement.

Almost 300 migrant children have been removed from a border patrol facility in Texas after media reports of lawyers describing “appalling” and potentially dangerous conditions, Department of Homeland Security officials told NBC News.

The children have been taken to a tent detention camp also in El Paso, Texas, where they will remain under the custody of Border Patrol until they can be placed with the Department of Health and Human Services, the DHS officials said. The Associated Press first reported on the conditions at the facility.

“I have never seen conditions as appalling as what we witnessed last week,” she said. “The children are hungry, dirty and sick and being detained for very long periods of time.”

“Children who are young themselves are being told by guards they must take care of even younger children,” Mukherjee said, adding that children as young as 7 and 8 were forced to care for 2-year-olds.

She said almost all the children had been separated from the adults they crossed the border with — siblings, aunts or grandparents, or even their parents.

Remember being a little kid? Remember what it felt like just to get lost in a shop for a few minutes?

Meanwhile, a different team of attorneys said they had also encountered children in similar conditions when they visited the Central Processing Center in McAllen, Texas, this month.

“It’s the same conditions,” immigration attorney Hope Frye said.

Frye said she encountered a 17-year-old Guatemalan mother with a premature baby at the crowded facility. The mother was wheelchair-bound after an emergency C-section in Mexico. When Frye met her, she was “caked with dirt” and neither she nor her baby had showered since arriving, she said.

Frye said she took a tissue to clean the baby and wiped off “black dirt from her neck.”

Frye described the baby as looking weak and said the mother told her she had stopped thriving while at the facility.

Frye said she felt she had no choice but to come forward to tell the young mother’s story. The teen and her baby have since been released from Border Patrol custody.

“She told me she believed if they did not get out, her baby would die,” she said. “There is no question in my mind that it was the extreme love of this 17-year-old mother that kept that baby alive.”

Image result for statue of liberty



Guest post: Religion was nearly mandatory

Jun 24th, 2019 4:52 pm | By

Originally a comment by iknklast on Nouvelle intrusion en maillot couvrant à Grenoble.

I remember when I was in school, and we were required to wear dresses. Those dresses were to have hems no more than 6 inches from the floor. We were in Maine and could not wear pants in the winter, though we could wear longer dresses.

I was not allowed to wear pants to school until 7th grade, and our school didn’t allow girls to wear anything but matching pantsuits until I was a sophomore in high school.

Needless to say, I come down on the side of maximum freedom to choose what you wear. I don’t have to approve of it; that isn’t my place. But I find the burkini, and the burqa in general, to be problematic. I suspect no women would choose to wear that if they weren’t compelled in some way, whether by their society or by their belief in a God who says “women shall not show their hair”.

On a separate but related topic:

I have read a lot about the issue of bans on religious clothing in schools, which most people say is anti-Muslim in intent (I suspect it is). I personally don’t think a ban on religious clothing is a bad thing, as long as you make it all religious clothing (and anti-religious clothing should be included, too. My atheist t-shirts would not be allowed, either). The reason has a lot to do with where I grew up. Religion was nearly mandatory, except they gave lip service to recognizing that the Constitution didn’t allow that, so you would be allowed to believe what you wanted, as long as what you wanted fit with the dominant belief – Southern Baptist. We had devotionals in school over the loudspeaker for many years after that was declared illegal, and mandatory prayer in the classroom. From what I have heard, they are still herding the children into assembly for prayers; I heard this from someone delighted with the practice (my father) and participating in it. When FFRF contacted them, they denied it, but of course they would, wouldn’t they?

So, back to clothes. The moment you put on a cross, a yarmulke, a pentagram, a burka, or a t-shirt saying every knee shall bow (or saying this is what an atheist looks like), you have labeled yourself. You are going to be subjected to the policing of the other children if what you are wearing is the “wrong” religion. I see this happening, I know it is happening, and I feel powerless about it because children are allowed to wear whatever religious items they wish (though in the school I grew up in, wearing the “wrong” religious items would get you sent home, and probably still does). Children can be extremely cruel to those who are the “wrong” religion. I know. I didn’t grow up Southern Baptist, and I experienced all sorts of hatred and contempt from my fellow children, even though my parents believed nearly every tenet of Christianity in nearly the exact same way. My parents were fundamentalists, and they enforced it strictly, but we happened to be Disciples of Christ, so…wrong. What if I had been a Jew? I didn’t think much about it growing up, because I didn’t think there were any Jews in our school. That’s because the Jews didn’t dare to be openly Jewish – I know that now, and have talked to some of the Jews in our school. One girl was Wicca, and was driven out of town.

My students frequently wear religious jewelry and t-shirts to class. Huge crosses or aggressively threatening t-shirts telling people who don’t agree with them that they will bow or burn. These make me feel uncomfortable, especially as a science teacher not knowing what I will face when I get to, say, evolution or the age of the Earth. I often suspect students of wearing some of it for that very purpose, hoping to let the teacher know they will not put up with godless materialism, and that they are prepared to be ugly (maybe even violent. That hasn’t happened so far, thankfully, but ugly confrontations have).

In short, I am very torn about the concept of religious clothing. I would like to see it not worn in schools, because of the nature of cruelty and children. But at the same time, I know that without burkas, some girls would not be allowed in school. It’s a difficult, double-edged sword. School uniforms was one answer to those problems, but people insisted on having religious exemptions to uniform rules, and these were granted, so it made no difference. Parents still insist on their children having markers of faith, and children still insist on policing piety.

Religion really does spoil things, doesn’t it?



Story? What story?

Jun 24th, 2019 4:47 pm | By

Trump’s bros are there for him.

The New York Post’s former top editor, a supporter of President Trump and an old lieutenant of Rupert Murdoch who returned to the conservative tabloid as an adviser in early 2019, ordered the removal of a story about writer Jean Carroll’s sexual assault allegations against President Trump, two people familiar with the matter told CNN Business.

The Post’s story about Carroll’s sexual assault allegations was mysteriously scrubbed from the tabloid’s website on Friday afternoon. The link to the story, which had been written by reporter Joe Tacopino, directed readers to a dead or 404 page.

A wire story by the Associated Press which had been published on the Post’s website was also removed.

the two people familiar with the matter told CNN Business that Col Allan, the former editor-in-chief of the Post who currently works as an adviser to the paper, ordered the story to be scrubbed from the website.

CNN Business was not able to reach Allan for comment despite multiple attempts.

Allan is a self-professed supporter of Trump. Accepting an award at an Australian media event in 2017, after he had exited as the Post’s top editor, Allan said it would have been “difficult” for him to work at the tabloid with Trump as president because he “like[s] the Donald a lot.”

But now he’s working for the tabloid and still liking the Donald a lot and so getting rid of stories reporting on allegations of rape.

MAGA.



Innocence

Jun 24th, 2019 4:25 pm | By

Not the first time, either.



Poop gender reveal party

Jun 24th, 2019 3:49 pm | By

Now who knew there was a need for this?

https://twitter.com/charlmarx89/status/1142799457282605058

The price is the same, so the pwitty pink dogshit bags cost more.



The separations

Jun 24th, 2019 1:24 pm | By

There’s this brilliant French tv series about life under the Occupation, Un village Français. The station that ran it a few years ago fills in the gaps between the end of one show and the start of the next (gaps because they all start on the hour) with whatever fits, and sometimes that is a one of a set of interviews with witnesses that accompanied the French series. They ran one such clip last night, and the subject was…

…the separations of children from their parents that happened during the deportations To The East.

It was only about 5 minutes worth, but it was very affecting nonetheless. The separations were almost all final. The interviews are elderly people describing the last time they saw, talked to, clung to their parents.

I suspect that the choice of this particular set of interviews was no accident. I watched it squirming and saying, ever louder, “We’re doing this right now. We are.”



Nouvelle intrusion en maillot couvrant à Grenoble

Jun 24th, 2019 12:55 pm | By

A “burkini” protest in Grenoble:

Muslim women in France are disobeying the rules at a local swimming pool by wearing burkinis.

In a protest inspired by US civil rights pioneer Rosa Parks, they bathed in suits covering their entire bodies – apart from the face, hands and feet – in the city of Grenoble on Sunday.

The Jean Bron swimming pool is among many in France that ban burkinis.

Leave Rosa Parks out of it. It’s not the same thing. Banning a garment is not the same as banning people.

After changing into burkinis, the Muslim members of the group were told by lifeguards that their swimsuits were not allowed.

Despite this, they entered the pool and bathed for about an hour with members of the community, many of whom cheered and applauded them for doing so.

It’s complicated. Banning the garment means banning women and girls who feel required to wear the garment, whether because they think their god requires it or because their male relatives force them to wear it or something in between. On the other hand permitting the garment works to normalize it and perhaps increase the pressure on other women and girls to wear it.

Burkinis, a mix of the words “burka” and “bikini”, are marketed to Muslim women as a way for them to swim in public while adhering to modesty edicts.

And that’s just it, isn’t it. What are “modesty edicts”? Why do they govern what women can wear but not what men can wear? Why do women have to swim in yards of cloth while men don’t?

But banning it seems coercive too. It’s a very yes but no but issue.

(Note that the French don’t call it a “burkini.” It’s not clear why the BBC does.)



Non-responsive boilerplate wibble

Jun 24th, 2019 11:41 am | By

Remember that dopy letter last week full of empty platitudes about being inclusive and supportive, and extra special vulnerability and respect for gender identity? The one by and for and to academics – people whose job it is (or should be) to say things clearly? Now there’s a followup article saying Y We Did It and you’ll be astonished to learn it’s the same empty platitudes all over again.

On 16 June, a letter from 34 academics to The Sunday Times argued that university policies to include trans and gender diverse people, in particular the Stonewall Diversity Champions programme, were in tension with “academic freedom of thought”. For us – as ordinary academics working in higher education – this felt like just the latest in a slew of media coverage on trans people which has ranged from the critical to the sensationalist. Setting out to write a response, we found that what we really wanted to do was something much greater: a manifesto, an affirmation of our LGBTQIA+ colleagues at all levels of higher education.

Or, maybe, not so much “much greater” as “much easier.” They set out to write a response and then realized that would require actually engaging with the arguments of the letter – and I’m guessing they didn’t want to do that because they don’t actually have any arguments in response. All they have is the same old boilerplate about being inclusive and supportive and extra special vulnerability and respect for gender identity. Non-responsive boilerplate wibble looks better in A Manifesto than it does in a response, because responses are supposed to, you know, respond.

In this new piece about Why They Did It they say it’s all gone swimmingly.

At the time of writing, our manifesto – our contribution to the debate – has attracted the signatures of more than 6,000 university staff from across the world. We have also received a vast number of personal responses expressing relief and gratitude that someone has taken a vocal stand in support of trans, gender-diverse and other queer students and colleagues, representing the views of what feels like the silent majority against the few critical voices in the media.

Relief and gratitude that someone has taken a vocal stand? Representing the views of what feels like the silent majority? There are people taking that vocal stand all over the place, complete with threats and images of guns, knives, baseball bats wrapped in barbed wire. The silent majority is far from silent.

Amid these responses, too, have been many heartbreaking stories from trans and gender-diverse people: fear of what colleagues will think of them; an ever-present question of whether their identity (reflected through their pronouns and name) will be denied; fear for their physical safety. In short, fear for whether their dignity as individual human beings will be observed and respected.

Heartbreaking? Fear of what colleagues will think of them is kind of the human condition, isn’t it? Or at least occasional anxiety about it. Very few people are completely free of worry about how well they pass as not-weird not-wrong not-freakish to the rest of the world. The nonsense about whether their fantasy “identity” (the one that negates their actual literal identity) will be denied is not worth a second of attention. Fear for their physical safety is a bad thing, for sure, but then trans activism as a movement is causing a lot of women to have that fear too. As for “fear for whether their dignity as individual human beings will be observed and respected” – again, that’s the pious empty blather again. Nobody is attacking or threatening or belittling their dignity as individual human beings. They’re entitled to as much of that as everyone else is (and no more). The issue isn’t their dignity as individual human beings, it’s their campaign to force us all to agree that they are what they are not. What about our dignity as individual human beings? Eh?

By not recognising trans people within our universities as being who they are, we deny them the dignity of their own identities.

But it’s not who they are. It’s who they say they are, which is a different thing. Consider: they could say they are Rasputin returned from the dead. They could say anything. Anyone could; we all could. Just saying isn’t magic, and we don’t have any moral obligation to agree that people are who they say they are when that saying contradicts the material reality we can detect with our eyes and ears.

Trans, gender-diverse, and other queer people are not problems to be theorised and hypothesised. They are living, breathing human beings.

Well, yes, of course they are, but the point is that the “trans” bit is something that can and should be “theorised and hypothesised” – aka analyzed and discussed and thought about and puzzled over. They don’t get to sew the trans bit onto themselves like Peter Pan sewing his soul shadow onto himself so that they can treat it as inviolate. It’s a novel idea, it’s morphing and inflating every day, and it makes large claims on us; of course we have to be able to discuss and dispute it freely.

There’s more of the same pious gibberish but I’m sick of it now. Basta.



What civil liberty is this exactly?

Jun 23rd, 2019 3:53 pm | By

The Connecticut ACLU is working with the two trans-identified high school boys who race with the girls and scoop up all the prizes.

Two transgender high school track and field athletes responded Wednesday to a Title IX complaint alleging that the runners prevented other female runners from top finishes and potentially from college scholarships.

The complaint filed earlier this week on behalf of three female track and field athletes in Connecticut argues that the two transgender runners, both of whom were assigned male at birth but identify as female, have “competitive advantages.” The complaint seeks to overturn the policy of the state’s high school athletics governing board, the Connecticut Interscholastic Athletic Conference, which allows athletes to compete based on the gender they identify with.

Both boys are visibly much taller and more muscular than the girls on the team. Of course they have competitive advantages, and of course they’re taking advantage of trans mania to win races they would otherwise lose.

“I have faced discrimination in every aspect of my life and I no longer want to remain silent,” said Bloomfield High track and field standout Terry Miller, one of the two transgender athletes cited in the complaint. “I am a girl and I am a runner. I participate in athletics just like my peers to excel, find community and meaning in my life. It is both unfair and painful that my victories have to be attacked and my hard work ignored.”

It’s not unfair for boys to race against boys.

I wonder how supportive Terry Miller would be if all the fastest boys “identified as girls” and joined him in competing against the actual girls.

Miller, along with Andraya Yearwood, who attends Cromwell High, have been working with the American Civil Liberties Union as the complaint begins to unfold. Miller won the State Open 200-meter title for the second straight year in 2019 and won the Class S titles in the 100 and 200, as well as the New England 200-meter championship. Yearwood, who is also transgender, finished third in the 100 meters in Class S and fourth in the 100 in the State Open.

Because they were competing against girls.

The national American Civil Liberties Union staff attorney also issued a statement Wednesday, calling it “heartbreaking.”

Attacking two black young women who are simply participating in the sport they love just because they are transgender is wrong, it is dangerous, and it is distorts Title IX, which is a law that protects all students on the basis of sex,” ACLU attorney Chase Strangio said. “Efforts to undermine Title IX by claiming it doesn’t apply to a subset of girls will ultimately hurt all students.”

On the basis of sex: men are not women and women are not men.

Boys are not “a subset of girls,” even if they are trans. Boys are not girls.

Title IX:

No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.

Miller and Yearwood are boys and should compete with boys. Saying boys should compete with boys is not exclusion or denial of benefits or discrimination.

The Connecticut ACLU has been tweeting about this a lot. Tough shit, girls, you lose.

https://twitter.com/acluct/status/1141833116367106050

Goodbye girls. You can always go back to knitting.