That terrible missing theory of mind again.

“This was something that nobody has ever thought could happen…”

No. It isn’t. It is not. That is not what it is. What it is is not that. People who know about this subject absolutely thought this could happen, and that it would. Epidemiologists, virologists, journalists who read and talk to epidemiologists and virologists – they most definitely thought it could happen, and they said so. Trump never thought it could happen. Trump is a narrow, stupid, incurious, ignorant huckster. What he never thought would fill a cosmos, and is of no interest.

I’m confused by this.

The clip shows a couple walking their dog in an empty landscape, and captions it “Not Essential.” It shows several more like that – people very social distanced indeed, getting fresh air and exercise.

What, exactly, is the problem? The Derbyshire cops seem to be confusing the pandemic with the war. Fuel isn’t rationed, nobody has to invade Europe right now, we can still find oranges.

But what if daily exercise taken locally to your home is more crowded than the Peaks? What if it’s harder to maintain social distance in your nabe than it is in the Peaks?

I just don’t understand what they’re talking about. Strolling around on the High Street just for the hell of it is a terrible idea, and clustering in popular national park spots is also a terrible idea, but surely finding an empty place and walking in that is a good idea.

What am I missing?

Utterly disgusting.

Any hope of G7 foreign ministers releasing a joint statement on the fight against COVID-19 was killed today after the U.S. insisted the document refer to it as the “Wuhan virus.”

As originally reported by Der Spiegel, and according to sources with knowledge of the situation, when U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo insisted the novel coronavirus be referred to by the name of the Chinese city where the outbreak first appeared, ministers from other countries refused to agree.

They were doing a video conference, having scrapped an in-person one planned for Pittsburgh because of the pandemic. One of the ministers suggested a joint statement on said pandemic.

Sources say that’s when Pompeo said the U.S. wanted to refer to COVID-19 as the “Wuhan virus.”

That was a red line for several ministers, and no joint statement was agreed upon or released.

One official from a country involved said Pompeo would not agree to a communique that didn’t refer specifically to the “Wuhan virus.”

…

Asked why including the term was so important in the global context of the pandemic, Pompeo blamed China for not spreading the word globally fast enough about just how dangerous the virus is.

This from a man who works for Donald Trump. This from a man who works for the “president” who has been lying about the virus from the beginning and continues to do so.

The Trump administration’s insistence on naming it the “Chinese virus,” or the “Wuhan” virus, contravenes international guidelines. The World Health Organization says viruses shouldn’t be named after cities and countries.

That advice is meant to avoid international finger-pointing in a crisis, and avoid repeats of taxonomic debates as occurred a century ago with the so-called Spanish flu…

But Trump and his pigs of course embrace international and racist finger-pointing.

H/t YNnB

I have to wonder what the hell basis the Trump campaign thinks it has to tell tv stations to pull this ad. Trump did say all those things we hear him saying, after all, and the numbers have rocketed up the way the graph illustrates, after all, so…???

So yeah, share share share.

I asked Kate Smurthwaite a few questions about life under COVID-19 for the people who make life worth living.

Tell us how the pandemic is affecting comedians and others who perform to live audiences.

The live entertainment industry no longer exists… Every comedian, musician, actor, magician, burlesque dancer I know as well as all the people I know who are sound engineers, front of house staff, dressers, bartenders, venue managers, promoters, publicists, poster-designers and stage hands are now all unemployed people and likely to stay that way for months and months to come.

There’s a widespread sense of panic and desperation. Few will qualify for government assistance, despite Boris’s big claims. For most of us turning professional is the result of years of hard work and sacrifice. Going back to jobs you tolerated on the way to building your dream grates and isn’t always possible, especially in a suddenly crowded market. I’ve been doing bits of online maths tutoring.

And there’s also a lot of activity in online communities. Comedians are making jokes, musicians are writing songs, people are talking politics, sharing survival tips and rapidly fluctuating feelings.

On top of this lots of performers appear to have the virus. Unsurprising considering how much we travel and how many people we meet. It’s literally our job! Well it used to be…

How is it affecting you personally?

First up – I’ve had it. Well extremely likely I’ve had it. After performing at the Perth Fringe in Australia I flew back via Hong Kong at very much the wrong time and subsequently had symptoms including swollen glands, fever and muscles aches. Of course I wasn’t offered testing, just sent back to the sofa. But that is over now, my health is back.

Emotionally it’s been tough. I’m not a stay-at-home kind of person. All my joy in life is on the road. Professionally of course but also personally. I like to travel and be wildly promiscuous. Both cancelled until further notice. The next person on Facebook who tells me to practice self-care by meditating is not going to come out of the situation well. Not my jam, never has been.

Financially I lost £14,000 of work out of my diary in a matter of days. Basically all of it. And in many cases I’d booked travel and accommodation and paid registration fees or for advertising which I am unlikely to get back.

My Patreon account, News At Kate, where generous people have sponsored me to make online political comedy videos has by necessity become my focus where once it was my sideline. And people are amazing. I’ve not lost a single sponsor, which would be totally understandable, and actually gained several.

Is it hard to write comedy in such a fast-changing situation? Remarks that seem edgy but ok one day can make us cringe the next – do you find it inhibiting or a welcome challenge to take that on?

I’ve been writing comedy for fifteen years, including for other people and TV shows, so that includes on topics I knew very little about and felt no particular connection to. So writing the comedy is not the issue. Its longevity, yes, is highly variable, but that is always in the nature of talking about political and topical issues.

There is a new and unexpected issue though. The nation is utterly split into those who are coping and those who aren’t. There are people ready and keen to discuss the long term implications of the crisis and there are people who really can’t cope with any more focus on it and just want some silly distraction. For the first time ever this week my News At Kate video offering will have two videos so my audience can choose which they want to hear.

Tell us about your show.

By genuine coincidence just as the crisis kicked in my solo show from last year, Clit Stirrer, finally came out of editing and was ready for release on download and streaming. I was already excited to be able to bring the show to fans living in places I can’t tour to. But now I’m also ridiculously grateful for the income boost.

Clit Stirrer is the most ambitious show I’ve ever written. It says something that I’ve had boiling up in my head for a long time, about what is and isn’t considered controversial, and it says it in a way that breaks a lot of the conventions of one-person comedy hours. It’s a multimedia mix of stand-up comedy, dramatic story-telling and sketches that draws heavily on my experiences of participating in TV debate and discussion shows from Question Time to This Morning.

When I opened the show at the Edinburgh Fringe I was mightily relieved to discover that it “worked”. My audience “got it”, they were as excited about it as I was. By the end of the first week the venue had a sign outside letting people know where and when they should start queuing if they wanted to get in to see it. We were full until the end of the run.

Two reviewers came, they both gave it five stars. After the Fringe I toured the show around the UK in small and independent venues (I’m far too “controversial” for the mainstream places of course…hahaha). There were several London shows, including one that had to be moved after the pub decided I was (you guessed it) “too controversial”.

The final date of the tour was in the beautiful Tara Arts Centre in Earlsfield in West London. It’s a really intimate venue, audience on three sides of the stage and that’s where we filmed it. It was edited by Flavio Buonerba, who also wrote the music we use in the show. He’s done a great job of keeping the “live” atmosphere. It really feels like being in the audience for an intimate event, not a staged TV special.

Do you think live performance will change radically after this nightmare?

I think live performance won’t exist at all for a long time yet. I expect the lockdown may be eased and then tightened again as the progress of the virus fluctuates but I don’t imagine live shows will be allowed for a long time. Perhaps at some point small venues will be allowed to open, with capacity limits and rules on spacing and sanitiser on every surface.

The big shift will come in a few years when there is a vaccine. Only then will people genuinely feel unafraid. I think it will bring with it a new era of decadence. A post-millennial roaring twenties. A new generation will grow up feeling, as we once did, as young people always should, that they are invincible. The rest of us will have been changed by the experience, shaken and unsettled, but also bloody grateful for the chance to sit in a pub and have a laugh together.

I hope to see you there xxx

http://www.katesmurthwaite.co.uk
http://www.patreon.com/newsatkate
https://gumroad.com/l/ksclit

More on the Federalist’s “let’s let the young people get C19 in hopes of herd immunity”:

Twitter temporarily locked the account of The Federalist Wednesday after the conservative opinion site published a piece, written by a dermatologist based in Oregon, that proposed the deliberate spread of the coronavirus in order to boost immunity to the disease.

The op-ed, penned by Dr. Douglas Perednia, proposed an “outside the box” solution to the current pandemic that flies in the face of advice from experts, including Dr. Anthony Fauci, who are urging social distancing.

…

“It is time to think outside the box and seriously consider a somewhat unconventional approach to COVID-19: controlled voluntary infection,” The Federalist wrote in a now-removed tweet linking to the op-ed.

That’s a pull-quote from the article. That’s not a thought experiment, it’s a “let’s consider this” suggestion. Saying let’s consider is a step removed from “let’s do” but it’s not as far removed as a thought experiment. Thought experiments are just that, they’re not suggestions to consider doing a thing.

Twitter initially added a warning to the link stating that the post might be “unsafe.”

Then, according to a Twitter spokesperson, “the account was temporarily locked for violating the Twitter Rules regarding COVID-19.”

It’s great that Twitter could find a few seconds to spare from locking the accounts of women who say that men are not women, in order to lock the account of someone saying we should consider deliberately spreading COVID-19.

The tweet was deleted, and the Federalist Twitter page appears to be back up and running. Twitter has taken aggressive measures to crack down on misinformation surrounding the coronavirus.

Federalist co-founders Sean Davis and Ben Domenech did not respond to Mediaite’s request for comment.

Probably too busy talking to Sean Hannity.

The monster has stirred.

Superb.

The Federalist did what now?

Erm…have they forgotten that there is no effective treatment yet? Which means there is no such thing as “safe infection”?

Also…a dermatologist? Really?

What’s the thinking here? That taking C19 seriously is a libbrul thing, the way taking climate change seriously is a libbrul thing? That treating it with frivolity or reckless endangerment or both is a Trump-Republican thing? (If it is that means Princess Ivanka will have to come out in favor of it, because she announced she’s a “proud Trump-Republican” the other day.) The hitch in the plan here is that viruses don’t give a fuck about your politics, any more than climate change does.

No one ever does.

First thing this morning.

The trolley problem revisited.

Daniel Dale has more samples from Trump’s fake “town hall” on Fox.

He hadn’t been reading anything about it.

Even now, he has to remind us that he is Sir.

And, as he told us the other day, he’s been right a LOT.

We have to ask him for lifesaving medical equipment nicely or he won’t give.

Jesus will save?

While schools and college campuses around the country remain closed to prevent the spread of coronavirus, Liberty University is set to allow the return this week of up to 5,000 students. The plan was announced by the private evangelical university’s  scandal–plagued president, Jerry Falwell Jr., an ally of President Donald Trump. Trump in recent days has dismayed public health experts by announcing he may push for the lifting of restrictions on businesses to reduce economic damage as soon as next week.

In an interview last week with Fox News Radio’s Todd Starnes, Falwell said it is fortunate that COVID-19 “doesn’t have a high mortality rate for young people because they’re the ones that are not worried about it. And I’m not worried about it.” Falwell said healthy people should stay away from those “who are high risk” and elderly people. But he accused the media of overhyping the disease. “Thank God we have the best president we could possibly have to deal with a crisis like this,” he said. “Shame on the media for trying to fan it up and destroy the American economy. They’re willing to destroy the economy just to hurt Trump.” 

If Trump is the best president we could possibly have to deal with a crisis like this, what would the worst one be like?

Apparently Trump is on Fox right now, talking dangerous bollocks. Yamiche Alcindor is taking notes for us so that we don’t have to watch.

How about that – several of Trump’s hotels have been closed because of C19.

President Trump’s private business has shut down six of its top seven revenue-producing clubs and hotels because of restrictions meant to slow the spread of the novel coronavirus, potentially depriving Trump’s company of millions of dollars in revenue.

Those closures come as Trump is considering easing restrictions on movement sooner than federal public health experts recommend, in the name of reducing the virus’s economic damage.

But there is probably no connection between the two, right? He would never put us all in danger just to keep his personal $$$ flowing.

In his unprecedented dual role as president and owner of a sprawling business, Trump is facing dual crises caused by the coronavirus. As he is trying to manage the pandemic from the White House, limiting its casualties as well as the economic fallout, his company is also navigating a major threat to the hospitality industry.

…

So far, the Trump Organization has closed hotels in Las Vegas; Doral, Fla.; Ireland; and Turnberry, Scotland — as well as the Mar-a-Lago Club in Florida and a golf club in Bedminster, N.J. Many of the clubs closed because they had to, under local orders. Others closed on their own, following strong guidance or recommendations from local officials.

Those are six of Trump’s top seven revenue-producing clubs and hotels, bringing in about $174 million total per year, according to Trump’s most recent financial disclosures. That works out to $478,000 per day — revenue that is likely to be sharply reduced with the clubs shuttered.

But he won’t kill us just to keep the cash flowing…surely…

Annals of corporate you have got to be kidding:

While much of the economy grinds to a halt, Amazon is doing more business than ever. The company has announced it is hiring 100,000 workers to try to meet surging demand. In 2019, Amazon had over $280 billion in revenue and $11.9 billion in profits. As more Americans shift their shopping online, it will likely do better this year. But, as the pandemic continues, Amazon maintains one of the stingiest paid sick leave policies among major corporations.

Well that’s why the profits are $11.9 billion!

In response to the pandemic, Amazon said it would provide two weeks of sick leave to “all Amazon employees diagnosed with COVID-19 or placed into quarantine.” Kroger had a similar policy until Saturday when Kroger expanded its policy to cover workers with COVID-19 symptoms or who need to care for sick family members. Amazon, however, has held firm. 

Amazon’s large contract workforce, which delivers packages and performs other critical tasks, is in even worse shape. Amazon is not providing any sick leave at all for these workers, even if they test positive for COVID-19. Instead, these workers must apply to the “Amazon Relief Fund” and apply for a grant to cover their sick leave.

That’s the joy of having a contract workforce, innit – no benefits.

Amazon donated $25 million to the fund and is soliciting individual donations to add to the pot. It initially included an option to donate by text.

Or Amazon could just, you know, pay its workers benefits, contract workers included.

Pence the other day:

Vice President Mike Pence on Sunday described his novel coronavirus test as a “kind of invasive” and a “not comfortable” experience.

Pence and second lady Karen Pence both tested negative for the virus Saturday afternoon after a staff member of his office had tested positive.

“The test was quick, but it goes a fair amount to the sinuses and it is not comfortable,” Pence said at a White House press briefing.

Oh yes? Not comfortable? That’s sad.

Newsweek tells us never mind about the cancer patients, the people thrown out of work and unable to pay rent, the bus drivers and supermarket workers and delivery drivers taking the risks – focus your attention instead on The Most Marginalized Of All.

With empty toilet paper aisles and shuttered businesses, some of the effects of social distancing and other pandemic measures have been readily apparent. But the pandemic has less visible consequences unique to vulnerable communities, like the additional burden placed on transgender people.

Transgender people are vulnerable, you see, unlike the rest of us. Women for instance – women are not vulnerable at all. Bitches.

Widespread closures and the strain placed on health care systems have thrown up obstacles to trans people like Tally the Witch author Molly Landgraff, who has experienced disruptions to her hormone replacement therapy (HRT) as a result of the coronavirus pandemic.

There is paragraph after paragraph of detail about Landgraff’s tragic struggle.

Dr. Alexis Chávez, psychiatrist and medical director of The Trevor Project—an organization focused on preventing death by suicide among LGTBQ youth—shared with Newsweek some of the less visible likely effects for trans people pursuing gender affirming medical support and medication during the coronavirus pandemic.

Apparently without pausing to ask if people should really be making a fuss about “gender affirming medical support” during a global emergency.

Self-quarantine isolation imposes a psychic burden that can be especially acute for trans youth.

No it doesn’t. Trans youth are not the people most burdened by self-quarantine; not even close. Being trans is not a category of thing that is made far more desperate by self-quarantine. What is? Being ill, frail, unable to walk, poor, parents of small children, in mourning, afraid – and on and on. Young people who think they’re the other sex do not come anywhere near the top of that long list, and they should refrain from whining about their idenniny right now.

While nearly everyone has experienced disruption to their plans during the coronavirus shutdown, for trans people the disruptions can be central to their identity and relationship with wider society.

In other words “sure, it’s inconvenient for other people, but for trans people IT’S A JILLION TIMES MORE SO. The usual narcissistic bullshit, in other words.

Now is not the time.

Another rally disguised as a press briefing today.

Enough of this trying to slow the contagion! Back to selling!

We’re lucky they don’t run 8 hours.