Fancy that, the Independent pointing out that single-sex toilets are important for girls. Mind you, it was more than six years ago.

Unesco is urging governments around the world to prioritise providing single-sex toilets in schools, warning as many as 1 in 10 girls in some countries are missing out on lessons because of their period.

Gee, I wonder why girls would not want to deal with menstruation in a toilet shared with boys.

“In 1990, the world committed to admitting equal numbers of boys and girls into primary school by 2005,” Audrey Azoulay, director-general of Unesco said. “Since then we have set ourselves a more ambitious set of gender equality targets with a deadline of 2030, but we must not forget that, despite considerable progress, one in three countries have yet to achieve the original goal.”

One “obstacle” to girls attending school was a lack of segregated toilets in schools, review director Manos Antoninis said, adding the agency found there was “little focus” on menstrual hygiene in schools in 21 low and middle income countries. “Improved sanitation to address adolescent girls’ concerns over privacy, particularly during menstruation, can influence their education decisions,” he said. “Single-sex toilets are desperately needed to overcome girls’ barriers to education.”

Yes but girls’ access to education doesn’t matter nearly as much as boys’ access to girls in the toilets.

In Bangladesh, 41 per cent of schoolgirls aged between 11 and 17 reported missing three days of school every month because of a lack of adequate sanitary care, according to the report.

Meanwhile, in rural areas of west African nations including Ethiopia, Kenya, Mozambique, Rwanda, Uganda and Zambia, less than a fifth of schools had four or more of Unesco’s five recommended menstrual hygiene services. These include separate sex toilets with doors and locks, water and rubbish bins.

The issue was not confined to those at secondary school, Unesco said, and primary schools also needed to introduce better toilet facilities to not discourage female pupils.

But but but what about the trans girls? Surely they matter infinitely more than actual girls.

Transgender woman wins court case for transfer to female prison

A transgender woman won a High Court case to be transferred to Northern Ireland’s female prison while being held on charges of threatening to kill her neighbour, it has emerged.

Ah well good to know at least it’s not an alarming type of crime at all.

Michelle James, 63, was moved from Maghaberry Prison to Hydebank Wood on Thursday after taking court proceedings. The move happened after the Department of Justice accepted there was a lack of policy in place for transgender prisoners and consented to the transfer.

Oh great, so there is no policy, so the wise and safe thing to do is to force women to deal with the danger. Thanks, Department of Justice, that’s sweet of you. It’s much better to terrorize and endanger a bunch of women than it is to make one man sad by denying his outrageous demand.

Justice Minister Naomi Long seems to be ok with the decision.

And what the risk assessors come up with is “Sure, put the man in the women’s prison”? Where did they get their training in risk assessment?

It’s so simple.

Ah yes the normal, reasonable, moderate version of thinking men can be women.

Contrary to Wu’s ridiculous “if”, the reality is that JKR has no power to “force” Wu to “live as a man.” Nobody has that power, because the whole idea is meaningless. We don’t “live as” primates or mammals or vertebrates, we just live. We are what we are. Wu is what he is.

It’s not “extreme” to know that men are women, and it’s not extreme to say so. It’s just life. It’s childish to try to force the world at large to play let’s pretend about what sex a man is.

And then of course the punchline where he has the brass neck to hope JKR will go on his “show” – well of course you do, bro, but that’s one of those “would look better on your cv than on mine” items.

Helen has the bit that Pixar took out.

Update: This is a storyboard, not the finished work. I thought the sketchiness was a stylistic choice, derp. H/t Sackbut

Disney decides not to tell children there are people who are the sex they’re not.

Pixar’s original animated series Win or Lose will no longer include a transgender storyline in a later episode, The Hollywood Reporter has learned.

The series follows a co-ed middle school softball team named the Pickles in the week leading up to their championship game. Each of the eight episodes center on the off-the-field life of a character and their point of view, whether it be a player, a parent, a coach or an umpire.

A spokesperson for Disney confirmed that the story arc was removed and provided the following statement to THR: “When it comes to animated content for a younger audience, we recognize that many parents would prefer to discuss certain subjects with their children on their own terms and timeline.”

Gosh, you think? How many parents don’t want Hollywood teaching their children that some lucky kids have Magic Gender?

Disney has continued to feature LGBTQ+ content in its more adult-focused fare, notably Marvel Television’s Agatha All Along, Searchlight Pictures’ All of Us Strangers, Next Goal Wins and Fire Island, and FX’s Pose, among others.

It’s not about “LGBTQ+” content, you buffoons, it’s about the nonsense that is magic gender. Lesbian and gay are not the same thing as magic gender. Use your brain.

Originally a comment by iknklast at Miscellany Room.

The VP said that [Warner Brothers/Discovery] had a duty to “provide a safe space” for trans employees to “live authentically”

This is not a duty of an employer. An employer has a duty to follow proper safety procedures and maintain a safe workspace in the physical sense, and they have a duty not to emotionally abuse employees. There is no duty to provide anyone a space to ‘live authentically’. In fact, most employers don’t do that; they have certain requirements about dress, behavior, language, and what the hell you are to do with your time while you are at work. For a gamer, ‘living authentically’ might involve using the work computers for nothing but gaming all day. For someone who is a slob, it might mean dressing so horribly that the customers complain. My employer had rules for me, and all of us. I could ‘live authentically’ only within those rules, which included not talking politics with my students, though I am a political junkie, and not using bad language, though I do appreciate the ability to swear now and then. (Have you heard of a college that won’t even let the theatre teacher swear? That’s forbidding someone to live authentically, if I may be so bold as to point it out.)

When did bosses get so lily-livered that they allow one group of employees to dictate so much? This isn’t an across the board duty, apparently, since they are not required to give the same allowance for women. I suspect they also wouldn’t be required to allow ‘furries’ to ‘live authentically’ in the office, or ‘trans-babies’. Men who want to be women? Bow down and genuflect to the most marginalized community ever…who manage to be marginalized without having to suffer any actual marginalization.

Fanboy for trans ideology calls someone a “leading feminist” and I ask him what makes someone a “leading feminist.” His reply is that someone else calls her that. Not an answer to the question I asked, bro. I didn’t ask whether other people call her that, I asked what makes someone it. Those are different questions. The difference is significant. It’s a difference that matters. Labels matter; words matter; reasons for saying things matter.

It’s the kind of hackish mushmouth empty verbiage that riddles so much lazy journalism. If you mean famous, say that. If you don’t mean famous, say what you do mean. Aim for specificity. It helps.

Susie Green says she will go right on destroying children’s lives.

An organisation led by the former chief executive of the transgender support charity Mermaids has vowed to keep on helping children get access to puberty blockers, despite a permanent UK ban.

Anne Trans Healthcare, co-founded by the former Mermaids leader Susie Green, hit out at [criticized] Labour after it was announced that the government would keep a ban on the drugs for under-18s.

…

Green, 56, was dismissed as Mermaids’ chief executive in 2022 over a loss of trust in her leadership, a Charity Commission report into the organisation revealed.

The following year she set up Anne Trans Healthcare, which offers access to puberty blockers for under-18s and boasts of having secured a “legal route” to get them to Britons. Anne, of which Green is a director, says on its website that patients can get them prescribed from doctors outside the UK and sent to an “EU destination” for pick-up.

…

Green confirmed to The Times that Anne Trans Healthcare was still “supporting people to access legal routes to gender-affirming healthcare”.

She said: “We will continue to do so despite a UK-wide ban. We do it because to do otherwise would be morally and ethically wrong. The ban is cruel, prejudicial and frankly inhumane.”

Green said she had “seen the positive impact that access to puberty blockers has on young people’s lives”.

And young people never ever grow up to regret things they did to their bodies when they were young. Cocaine, alcohol, fentanyl, whatever, it’s all good. Bring on the body modifications!

She added: “I truly believed that the Labour government would not take this ban forward following the consultation process. Parents reported that they had told him of the anguish caused by the ban and Wes Streeting stood there and told those young people and their families that he heard them.

“Yet he walked away and chose to ignore them, as he has also ignored the 59 per cent of consultation responses, from respondents of his choosing, that said a ban should not go ahead.”

He didn’t “choose to ignore them”; he chose to protect them from lunatics like Susie Green.

Surprise surprise, it’s not just France.

Telegram ‘rape chat groups’ with up to 70,000 members uncovered

Ain’t technology great?

Thousands of men are participating in chat groups in which they share suggestions on how to rape and sexually assault women, a German investigation has revealed.

The groups, on the instant messaging service Telegram, have as many as 70,000 members who mostly communicate with one another in English and appear to come from a variety of countries.

Users claimed to have assaulted women in their household, including wives, partners, sisters and mothers, and also shared instructions with others on how to do the same.

It’s what Germaine Greer said – “Women have very little idea of how much men hate them.”

The BBC reports:

A 15-year-old boy has been charged after a mobile phone was discovered hidden in a girls’ toilet at a secondary school in Dundee.

The incident is understood to have come to light when a female pupil at the school discovered the device on Tuesday afternoon.

Police Scotland said the boy has been charged in connection, following a report of voyeurism.

A new Dominique Pelicot in the making.

Masha Gessen in the NYRB November 10, 2016 on the rules of survival in an autocracy:

[Obama] added, “The point, though, is that we all go forward with a presumption of good faith in our fellow citizens, because that presumption of good faith is essential to a vibrant and functioning democracy.” As if Donald Trump had not conned his way into hours of free press coverage, as though he had released (and paid) his taxes, or not brazenly denigrated our system of government, from the courts and Congress, to the election process itself—as if, in other words, he had not won the election precisely by acting in bad faith.

Similar refrains were heard from various members of the liberal commentariat, with Tom Friedman vowing, “I am not going to try to make my president fail,” to Nick Kristof calling on “the approximately 52 percent majority of voters who supported someone other than Donald Trump” to “give president Trump a chance.” Even the politicians who have in the past appealed to the less-establishment part of the Democratic electorate sounded the conciliatory note. Senator Elizabeth Warren promised to “put aside our differences.” Senator Bernie Sanders was only slightly more cautious, vowing to try to find the good in Trump: “To the degree that Mr. Trump is serious about pursuing policies that improve the lives of working families in this country, I and other progressives are prepared to work with him.”

Blah blah blah, but he’s not that guy. He never has been, and he wasn’t then, and it was obvious he wasn’t. Then he spent four years demonstrating how thoroughly he isn’t that guy. He’s a bad man. Really bad. The kind of bad where there’s no good to leaven it a little. The kind of bad that prefers doing bad things to doing good ones. The kind of bad that enjoys watching people suffer. The kind we all hope never to encounter.

The second falsehood is the pretense that America is starting from scratch and its president-elect is a tabula rasa. Or we are: “we owe him an open mind.” It was as though Donald Trump had not, in the course of his campaign, promised to deport US citizens, promised to create a system of surveillance targeted specifically at Muslim Americans, promised to build a wall on the border with Mexico, advocated war crimes, endorsed torture, and repeatedly threatened to jail Hillary Clinton herself. It was as though those statements and many more could be written off as so much campaign hyperbole and now that the campaign was over, Trump would be eager to become a regular, rule-abiding politician of the pre-Trump era.

Eight years later, he’s eager to become the worst monster any of us have ever met in our nightmares.

Good to see that the bros are learning from the Pelicot trial.

That last sentence is a translation of “Allez les tricoteuses!” That’s a vintage sexist insult dating back to The Revolution: it labeled women on the left who supposedly sat around knitting while heads rolled. It was not well received.

Why women are paying attention:

As France digests the implications of its largest rape trial, which is due to end this week, it’s clear that many French women – and not just those at the courthouse in Avignon – are pondering two fundamental questions.

The first question is visceral. What might it say about French men – some would say all men – that 50 of them, in one small, rural neighbourhood, were apparently willing to accept a casual invitation to have sex with an unknown woman as she lay, unconscious, in a stranger’s bedroom?

The second question emerges from the first: how far will this trial go in helping to tackle an epidemic of sexual violence and of drug-facilitated rape, and in challenging deeply held prejudices and ignorance about shame and consent?

How far will anything go in helping to tackle the ancient, obstinate, immovable hatred of women that seems to be baked into human nature?

I’ve been wondering that my whole adult life. I’ve never really gotten over the shock of learning how obstinate and immovable it is.

Dominique Pelicot jailed for 20 years

A French court found Dominique Pelicot guilty of repeatedly drugging and raping his then wife Gisèle for almost a decade, and inviting dozens of strangers to rape her unconscious body in a case that horrified the world.

The 72-year-old, who was married to Gisèle for 50 years, was handed the maximum 20-year prison term. He had pleaded guilty to the charges. Gisele Pelicot, who waived her right to anonymity, thanked her supporters after the verdicts and said she respected the court’s decision.

“This trial was a very difficult ordeal,” she said in her first comments at the end of the sentencing.

Yes I should think it was.

She’s the “real sexist slur” [con, I assume]. She is. She’s in a deep sleep because her husband drugged her, and she’s the real sexist slur.

Humans are a mistake.

Well ok then.

Agghhhhh no.

A King County Metro bus driver was fatally stabbed in Seattle’s University District early Wednesday, marking the first killing of a Metro driver on the job in 26 years and the latest example of violence that at times is shaking public confidence in the regional transit system.

No no no no no. I can’t stand it. Metro drivers are heroes (both sexes). It’s a very tough job, because there’s the driving but there are also the people. I’ve witnessed countless drivers being helpful, friendly, polite, all that good dealing-with-people stuff. They have to put up with a great many passengers who don’t reciprocate, who indeed start with aggression and go on from there. They of course have to put up with drunks, addicts, people who haven’t had a shower in years, people who make threats. They’re heroes, seriously.

Police said they determined an adult male passenger got into an altercation with Yim at 15th Avenue Northeast and Northeast 41st Street. Yim then walked a short distance from the bus and collapsed, according to police.

It was not made known Wednesday morning if other passengers were aboard the Route 70 bus, which was headed south.

I know that bus well. It’s the only downtown to the U District bus (there’s also light rail). It goes past Lake Union, so there are nice views. It’s the kind of route where drivers often have some people-managing to do. Being murdered should not be part of the package.

Metro and Sound Transit have struggled with violence, mainly against passengers, as incidents increased post-pandemic. In 2023, a man was stabbed 19 times at random on a light rail train at Othello Station, and a young man was shot to death in a targeted attack aboard a bus in White Center.

Wednesday’s stabbing comes two days after Metro closed four bus stops at the corner of 12th Avenue South and South Jackson Street in the Little Saigon area — where nine people were stabbed in November. The union pushed for those stops to be closed, Woodfill, the union president, said.

The union was not wrong.

It’s like living under some unpleasantly powerful and vindictive medieval royalty.

Republicans seem to be very serious about sending Liz Cheney to jail.

GOP Representative Barry Loudermilk, the chairman of the House Administration Subcommittee on Oversight, released his own findings on the House January 6 select committee. The report accused former Cheney, who sat on the committee, of witness tampering, alleging that she “colluded with ‘star witness’ Cassidy Hutchinson.” Hutchinson is the former Trump White House aide turned MAGA villain after she testified before the January 6 committee on the chaos surrounding the attack on the Capitol.

Everything must be turned to shit for the sake of protecting and encouraging the evil monster hell-bent on slaughtering the peasantry and subjugating everyone else.

Loudermilk’s findings also called for Cheney to be criminally investigated and repeatedly claimed the January 6 committee withheld or destroyed evidence. 

Evidence that what? That Trump didn’t try to seize power by sending a mob to attack the legislature? It can’t be done; we all saw him sending the mob to the Capitol to attack the legislature, which it duly did.

What’s the problem with this argument?

Representative Nancy Mace is proudly embracing her George Wallace moment. It’s time for dissent.

When Vivian Malone and James Hood enrolled at the University of Alabama in 1963, Governor Wallace traveled to Tuscaloosa to stand defiantly in the doorway of the Foster Auditorium. In tailored suit and tie, the white southern governor, whom Dr Martin Luther King once called “perhaps the most dangerous racist in America today”, prevented the two Black students from attending class.

Wallace’s Stand in the Schoolhouse Door upheld the impassioned promise he made while delivering his inaugural address: “Segregation now, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever”. Mace has clearly studied this history and chosen to side with its least savory character.

When Sarah McBride became the first out transgender woman elected to Congress this past November, Mace swiftly introduced a House resolution to ban McBride from using the bathroom. This legislation, which has far-reaching implications, might as well be known as Mace’s Stand in the Bathroom Door.

What’s wrong is that the two are not comparable. The fact that a door was involved in Wallace’s disgusting intervention does not make Nancy Mace’s resolution similar to Wallace’s racist aggression.

Men are already barred from women’s bathrooms, and they always have been, not because they were considered subordinate or inferior but rather the contrary: men have the power, physical and social, so women don’t feel safe taking their pants down with men in the room. Wallace stood (literally and figuratively) for white power and oppression; women are not the powerful oppressive sex. Men pretending to be women are not comparable to the civil rights activists of Wallace’s day.

When cruel injustice becomes enshrined in law by politicians fueled by hate the only conscionable response is to dissent.

It’s not “cruel injustice” to tell men to stay out of the women’s toilets, even if the men say they are women. The cruel injustice would be to let them barge into the women’s toilets, because damn few women actually want men in there. Actually I don’t think anyone wants any kind of people in there – I think we’d all much prefer individual locked rooms. There’s an upscale shopping center in Seattle that provides those and my god the feeling of luxury – it’s like a tiny vacation.

That is why, in a commitment to affirm the basic human dignity and respect all people deserve, I helped lead a group of trans women, non-binary people, and cis allies in holding a sit-in in a women’s bathroom in Congress. 

See the man boast about invading a women’s toilet in Congress. Yeah, bro, the Nashville sit-ins you’re not.

Queen’s University Belfast Trans Equality FAQ:

As part of its wider Equality and Diversity Policy, Queen’s University (“the University”) is committed to providing an inclusive and welcoming community where staff and students are enabled to meet their full potential and are treated as individuals.

This includes providing advice, support and understanding to those individuals who have transitioned, are transitioning, or are planning to transition, are non-binary, intersex or gender non-conforming.

That’s nice. Does it also include those individuals who are women?

It doesn’t seem to. On the Diversity and Inclusion page (which links to the Trans Equality page which links to the Trans Equality FAQ page) we get a link to Menopause, but we do not get a link to Women and Equality, and thus no link to the Women and Equality FAQ page. I take it there are no such pages. Why do trans people get a nice selection of sub pages while women get only…menopause?

There is a Gender Equality page, but it’s weirdly shy about what it means by Gender Equality. One gets the feeling that Queens thinks women have already won their fight and really don’t deserve or need any more attention from the equality squad. I, for one, get the feeling Queens thinks women are the establishment, while trans people are the exciting important fabulous people these days. Women are Mummy, trans people are glitter and sex and balloon-tits.

Buffoon of the ages talks to TIME magazine, with the usual result.

TRUMP: Well, I think we ran a flawless campaign. It was, it was really quite something. I called it 72 Days of Fury. There were no days off. There were no timeouts. If you made a mistake, it would be magnified at levels that nobody’s ever seen before. So you couldn’t make a mistake. And I think we just really ran well. It was a drive to go through it. It started 72 days out. For some reason, it just seemed to be it. And I worked very hard. I’ve been, I’ve been given credit by, actually, the reporters that followed me, because it was, you know, just, it just was all the time, every day, and we said the right things. 

To pretend for a moment that he actually thought about what he was saying – I disagree that he won the election because he “said the right things.” I think it’s because he said the kind of things that many people like. It’s not his eloquence, or his style, or his perspicacity, or his insight, or his analytic skills. It’s more the opposite. He says dumb, vulgar, trashy things, and enough people like that about him that he got elected.

That has to be true at least to some extent, because it’s not as if anyone can ignore the way he talks. It’s not a hidden or subtle aspect of him. It’s front and center, and loud. I think he makes people feel good about being…no better than adequate.

Harsh thing to say, I know, but people who voted for Trump are people who voted for Trump, so I think some harsh is in order.

Will you commit to honoring the Senate’s authority to reject or confirm your nominees? 

Well, sure, I want them to do that. I think—I don’t think there are too many. I don’t think that— look, everybody has, that’s why they have menus in restaurants. You have different choices. Some people love certain candidates. I’ll tell you, I put up some that I thought would be a little more controversial, and they turned out not to be necessarily the ones that are controversial.

One of them who is controversial, who I just want to ask you a quick question about, is RFK Jr, who is a noted vaccine skeptic. If he moves to end childhood vaccination programs, would you sign off on that?

We’re going to have a big discussion. The autism rate is at a level that nobody ever believed possible. If you look at things that are happening, there’s something causing it.

Yes, and the something causing it is knowing more about what autism is and how to diagnose it. It’s not more autism but more diagnosis of autism.

Do you think it’s linked to vaccines? 

No, I’m going to be listening to Bobby, who I’ve really gotten along with great and I have a lot of respect for having to do with food, having to do with vaccinations. He does not disagree with vaccinations, all vaccinations. He disagrees probably with some. But we’ll have it. We’re going to do what’s good for the country. 

So that could include getting rid of some vaccinations? 

It could if I think it’s dangerous, if I think they are not beneficial, but I don’t think it’s going to be very controversial in the end. 

If he thinks they’re dangerous, if he thinks they’re not beneficial – what does he know about it? Nothing, just like most of us. His random opinion on the subject is not relevant, and neither is Kennedy’s.

Do you agree with him about the connection between vaccines and autism? 

I want to see the numbers. It’s going to be the numbers. We will be able to do—I think you’re going to feel very good about it at the end. We’re going to be able to do very serious testing, and we’ll see the numbers. A lot of people think a lot of different things. And at the end of the studies that we’re doing, and we’re going all out, we’re going to know what’s good and what’s not good. We will know for sure what’s good and what’s not good. 

Shorter: I know absolutely nothing about it.