Fashionable nonsense has been with us since the time that prehistoric man first transcribed Of Grammatology on to the walls of the Lascaux caves. Here we cast an eye back at some historical highlights.


Brian Appleyard’s Understanding the Present reviewed. *

Apr 10th, 2010 | Filed by

‘Scientists and their works are everywhere described in an arctic language of despair.’… Read the rest



Jihad versus McWorld *

Apr 10th, 2010 | Filed by

In the 1992 article that he expanded into an excellent book, Barber examines the ways Identity and Shopping are dividing the world between them.… Read the rest



Dwight Macdonald *

Apr 10th, 2010 | Filed by

‘…all but a fraction of his own writing molders unattended in America’s used bookstores. Like the New York Intellectuals with whom he was associated…he is referenced more often than read, a sad fate for a critic who wrote so much, so well and with such wit and insight.’… Read the rest



Professionalization in the Humanities *

Apr 10th, 2010 | Filed by

What if you want to talk about an authentic self instead of an ‘authentic self’?… Read the rest



Romila Thapar demolishes Sanskritic Indus Theory *

Apr 10th, 2010 | Filed by

‘Indian history from the perspective of the Hindutva ideology reintroduces ideas that have long been discarded and are of little relevance to an understanding of the past.’… Read the rest



Mary Lefkowitz on Distortions of History *

Apr 10th, 2010 | Filed by

He has his view and you have yours and they have theirs. So it goes.… Read the rest



Paul Boghossian on the Sokal Hoax. *

Apr 10th, 2010 | Filed by

‘To concede that no one ever believes something solely because it’s true is not to deny that anything is objectively true.’… Read the rest



Lee Smith on Tariq Ramadan *

Apr 10th, 2010 | Filed by

‘Ramadan is a cold-blooded Islamist who believes that Islam is the cure for the malaise wrought by liberal values.’… Read the rest



‘Why should science be any different?’ *

Apr 10th, 2010 | Filed by

‘We no longer defer to bishops or politicians; scientists are simply facing the same fate.’ Yes but bishops are one thing and scientists are another. We can demand that scientists produce evidence, but what evidence can a bishop offer?… Read the rest



Research psychology or psychotherapy. *

Apr 10th, 2010 | Filed by

‘…many of the widely accepted claims promulgated by therapists are based on subjective clinical opinions and have been resoundingly disproved by empirical research conducted by psychological scientists.’… Read the rest



Susan Haack on Vulgar Rortyism *

Apr 10th, 2010 | Filed by

It’s important to distinguish between necessary, useful technicality, and jargon or pseudo-mathematics substituting for genuine rigor.… Read the rest



Democracy and its Global Roots *

Apr 10th, 2010 | Filed by

‘Developments take place in a world linked by ideas rather than by race.’… Read the rest



A Designer Universe? *

Apr 10th, 2010 | Filed by

What a coincidence that we’re here and not on that nasty Pluto.… Read the rest



Raymond Tallis on Sokal & Bricmont. *

Apr 10th, 2010 | Filed by

‘The protection built into Theory…is composed of layer on layer of ignorance.’… Read the rest



Naomi Weisstein defends the beanie hat *

Apr 10th, 2010 | Filed by

We need to know what’s out there so that we can change it.… Read the rest