Two articles in The New Republic in the past year or two, one about Theodore Roosevelt and the other about John Adams, are also about the oversimplification of history. Wilentz says the Adams biography is too reverential and respectful, too much of a hagiography. Stansell says the Roosevelt is too incurious, too movie-like and you-are-there-ish, too long on detail and much too short on questions and analysis. Is this inevitable in writing popular biography and history? Does one absolutely have to choose between writing a book that’s fun and entertaining and not too difficult, and one that actually explores and interrogates the subject rather than merely telling a story about it? Is it entirely out of the question to present … Read the rest
All entries by this author
‘I prefer unification to reduction’
Sep 14th, 2002 |
Filed by Ophelia Benson
Steven Pinker talks to the New York Times about worries over equality and free will that influence our views of the mind.… Read the rest
Astronaut thumps moon landing doubter
Sep 14th, 2002 |
Filed by Ophelia Benson
Would faking a moon landing be more difficult than actually doing one? Probably, but the myth lives on.… Read the rest
Disturbances in the field
Sep 13th, 2002 |
Filed by Ophelia Benson
In a frivolous-Friday mood, The Guardian offers links to both credulous and skeptical material on crop circles.… Read the rest
Education does not rule out credulity
Sep 12th, 2002 |
Filed by Ophelia Benson
Michael Shermer in Scientific American says the siren song of pseudoscience can be too alluring to resist.… Read the rest
Suspicion fills the gap
Sep 12th, 2002 |
Filed by Ophelia Benson
The new president of the British Association for the Advancement of Science says the gap between scientists and the public leads to a widespread distrust of rational inquiry.… Read the rest
Teaching is not propaganda
Sep 11th, 2002 |
Filed by Ophelia Benson
Education professor propounds eccentric notion that teachers may know more than students.… Read the rest
Blunt opinions
Sep 10th, 2002 |
Filed by Ophelia Benson
‘Naipaul has always eschewed the rhetoric of marginality.’… Read the rest
Uncertain terrain
Sep 10th, 2002 |
Filed by Ophelia Benson
Skeptic editor Michael Shermer explains the difference between science and pseudoscience, and explores the intermediate area where the jury is still out.… Read the rest
Perhaps not so radically different
Sep 10th, 2002 |
Filed by Ophelia Benson
Margaret Talbot takes Carol Gilligan to task for her claim that there are radical differences between male and female minds.… Read the rest
Fantasy beats reason every time
Sep 10th, 2002 |
Filed by Ophelia Benson
Philosopher Simon Blackburn in despair at humanity’s capacity for self-deception.… Read the rest
Kennewick Man to be studied
Sep 10th, 2002 |
Filed by Ophelia Benson
A federal magistrate judge has ordered the US government to let scientists study the bones of Kennewick Man, an ancient skeleton discovered on the banks of the Columbia River.… Read the rest
End the excuses
Sep 10th, 2002 |
Filed by Ophelia Benson
Ian Buruma argues that it is time that people stopped hiding behind a sloppy relativism as a way to excuse the inexcusable.… Read the rest
Get real about human nature
Sep 9th, 2002 |
Filed by Ophelia Benson
Steven Pinker on the fears that lead to people embracing an erroneous conception of human nature.… Read the rest
Oxymoron?
Sep 4th, 2002 |
Filed by Ophelia Benson
The evolution of the scientific creationist.… Read the rest
Misunderstanding Richard Dawkins
Sep 1st, 2002 | By Jeremy StangroomIntroduction
Richard Dawkins’s The Selfish Gene is the kind of book
that changes the way that people look at the world. Its importance
is that it articulates a gene’s-eye view of evolution. According
to this view, all organisms, including human beings, are ‘survival
machines’ which have been ‘blindly programmed’ to preserve their
genes (see The Selfish Gene, p. v). Of course, extant
survival machines take a myriad of different forms – for example,
it is estimated that there are some three million different species
of insect alone – but they all have in common that they have been
built according to the instructions of successful genes; that
is, genes whose replicas in previous generations managed to get
themselves copied.
At … Read the rest
Will Lingua Franca be back?
Aug 20th, 2002 |
Filed by Ophelia Benson
Intellectual arguments and personal bile make a compelling read.… Read the rest
Science Wars: an interview with Alan Sokal
Aug 15th, 2002 | By Julian BagginiDennis Healey once compared a verbal attack by one of his parliamentary
colleagues to "being savaged by a dead sheep." I was reminded
of this remark when I met the physicist Alan Sokal, the man who,
along with mathematician Jean Bricmont, has caused outrage and indignation
among the French intelligentsia first with his spoof post-modern
article published in the journal Social Text, and then for
his and Bricmont’s book Intellectual Impostures, which
combines a catalogue of misuses of scientific terms by predominantly
French thinkers with a stinging attack on what they call "sloppy
relativism"
Given this history, you’d expect Sokal to be more lupine than lamb-like,
but in fact, he is a friendly, chatty, effusive figure more interested… Read the rest
Lay Sceptic’s Travels on Planet Energy
Aug 14th, 2002 | By Elina RiglerRecently I have been feeling like a visitor on an alien planet: ordinary people
around me have started to communicate in a new, esoteric language. Let’s call
it Energyspeak. It uses the same vocabulary as Oldspeak (my native language),
but many of its words have been stripped of their usual meanings. Its speakers
also seem to inhabit a radically different metaphysical universe. They inform
me that there is a bioenergetic field flowing through and around us; and that
disturbances in it have dire consequences for our health. Those fluent in Energyspeak
pay regular visits to energy therapists (acupuncturists; homeopaths; reflexologists;
reiki healers) who are able to treat all kinds of physical and emotional problems
by correcting energy imbalances. I myself … Read the rest