All entries by this author

Richard Sennett *

Jan 27th, 2003 | Filed by

Works as an academic sociologist, but doesn’t really write academic sociology.… Read the rest



Well Who Did Move my Cheese? *

Jan 27th, 2003 | Filed by

Appropriately acid look at self-help ‘books’. ‘It’s very cheap and obvious to laugh at self-help books (which is no reason not to do so)’.… Read the rest



Hugh Trevor-Roper *

Jan 27th, 2003 | Filed by

His ‘approach to history was…based not so much on original research as on wide reading’ including ‘economists, sociologists, philosophers, art historians and even anthropologists and psychologists.’… Read the rest



Mind Readers on Radio 4

Jan 26th, 2003 8:37 pm | By

A recent Start the Week on Radio 4 discussed not one but two issues that we’ve been talking about here on Butterflies and Wheels. Nancy Cartwright, a philosopher of science, here asserts the trendy notion that the discoveries of science are a product of negotiation and agreement among scientists, and that the idea of universality (of science as well as of any other kind of knowledge) is one we should all be very suspicious of. Fortunately, there is also a working scientist on the premises, who disputes her views. Also present is Germaine Greer, who voices one of my favourite exasperations, with the fashion for gossippy biographies of poets and writers that give short shrift to the mental life of … Read the rest



Hugh Trevor-Roper *

Jan 26th, 2003 | Filed by

The Independent’s obituary of the historian who ‘enjoyed vendettas as well as friendships’, as any historian should.… Read the rest



Steve Jones on Raelian Clones *

Jan 26th, 2003 | Filed by

It’s a failure of education that editors take the Raelian story seriously, Jones says. Cloning is not clowning.… Read the rest



Networks *

Jan 25th, 2003 | Filed by

Six degrees of Kevin Bacon. Networks are either a promising new field, or over-hyped. Or both.… Read the rest



Precautionary or Libertarian *

Jan 24th, 2003 | Filed by

Freeman Dyson on biotechnology, the future, and a debate in Davos.… Read the rest



Tom Tomorrow *

Jan 24th, 2003 | Filed by

The People want tax cuts for the rich, it’s left-wing elitists who don’t. Slippery word, ‘elitist’.… Read the rest



What Everyone Else Thinks? Think the Opposite *

Jan 23rd, 2003 | Filed by

Christopher Hitchens loves mess on the carpet, Stefan Collini says in The London Review of Books.Read the rest



Sigmund, Will You Never Leave?

Jan 22nd, 2003 6:53 pm | By

Oh honestly. Does nonsense never go away? Well I shouldn’t complain, it certainly keeps us busy and entertained here at B and W. But it would be nice to think humans could pay attention once in awhile. Take
this article about Freud in Time magazine, for instance.

At the same time, post-Freudian psychotherapists are figuring out that the old master still has something to offer the science of mental health: an understanding of the human mind and its many malfunctions that’s richer, fuller and more exciting than anything invented since.

Really? Well I suppose it depends how you define ‘richer’ or ‘more exciting’. It would be rich and exciting to be told our brains were full of gremlins and … Read the rest



Basketball Rules OK

Jan 22nd, 2003 2:57 pm | By

A few days ago I took issue with a column John Sutherland wrote in the Guardian about the wonderful benefits of US university athletic programmes. Here is a delightful little story about some of the drawbacks of the US approach. College basketball fans harass and make death threats against an English teacher who has the unmitigated temerity to criticise a coach. Clearly, the basketball coach is important and the pesky teacher is just a thing that causes trouble. Could such an attitude possibly be harmful to actual, you know, education?… Read the rest



Good Idea? Or Idiotic? *

Jan 22nd, 2003 | Filed by

At least the teacher is ‘bothered’ that the lyrics refer to women as bitches and hoes. ‘It’s dehumanising,’ he shrewdly notices.… Read the rest



Classical Economics and the Other Kind *

Jan 22nd, 2003 | Filed by

Who defines ‘rational’ and ‘works’ and ‘sorts out’, anyway?… Read the rest



Anti-intellectual? Us? *

Jan 22nd, 2003 | Filed by

University is about getting a job that pays a lot and about football. Isn’t it?… Read the rest



Burglar University

Jan 21st, 2003 5:58 pm | By

Sorry, but I do think this is pretty funny. It’s the bit about cognitive skills classes.

The cognitive courses all prisoners have to attend – usually Enhanced Thinking Skills – were deemed effective when they first started, but recent studies have shown that prisoners can emerge from these even more likely to reoffend than they were without them…Or it could be that they imbibe the skills without accepting the moral message, so they just come out with an enhanced ability to think crimes through and avoid mistakes like leaving their dog at the scene of the crime or ordering a pizza with a thieved credit card (both real occasions of burglar ineptitude in the past fortnight; the beauty of

Read the rest


A Global Perspective *

Jan 21st, 2003 | Filed by

Depletion of fish stocks not a problem, fisheries scientist says, if future generations like plankton stew.… Read the rest



Not All Destruction is Human-Made *

Jan 21st, 2003 | Filed by

Fire storm near Canberra destroys observatory and all its equipment.… Read the rest



Love That Derrida

Jan 20th, 2003 10:51 pm | By

I sort of hate to agree with The National Review about anything, but then it’s not my fault: if the left will insist on being so silly all the time, they have only themselves to blame. Anyway this is a very funny piece about Jacques Derrida and his inexplicable hold over the minds of far too many literary critics and other “theorists”.

Indeed, the critical point to be borne in mind with regards to Derrida…is that he is not now, nor has he ever been, a philosopher in any recognizable sense of the word, nor even a trafficker in significant ideas; he is rather a intellectual con artist, a polysyllabic grifter who has duped roughly half the humanities professors in

Read the rest


Moon Landing Skeptics *

Jan 20th, 2003 | Filed by

You know how the gummint is, they cover up alien landings in Roswell, so why not fake landings on the moon?… Read the rest