All entries by this author

Proving the point *

Nov 4th, 2002 | Filed by

Steven Pinker points out that New York Times book reviewer resorts to the very fallacy the book is about.… Read the rest



Dignity and *

Nov 4th, 2002 | Filed by

Mystery, humility, human finitude; science has nothing to say about who we are; the self cannot be an illusion; free will must be true…Such are the platitudes that greet a book on bioethics by a presidential pundit.… Read the rest



Cleaning the closets

Nov 3rd, 2002 7:50 pm | By

There is a difference between amassing a great many facts, and acquiring or conveying knowledge or understanding. There is also a difference between exploring every possible detail and speculative possibility of Poet X’s sex life, and writing a good intellectual biography. The review of yet another new biography of Byron indicates that we have yet another example of the first part of the equation instead of the second. There has been a rash of such biographies in the last decade or so, profoundly anti-intellectual works that undertake to clean out the closets of various writers and thinkers without stopping to ask why we care about those closets if we don’t care about the work. We know more than we knew … Read the rest



Elitism or Meritocracy?

Nov 3rd, 2002 5:50 pm | By

Frank Dobson, a Labour M.P. and former Secretary of State for Health, has an article in today’s Observer that assails the ‘elitist’ policies of Tony Blair’s government, particularly in education and health care. The health issue seems reasonably straightforward: he says that less money is being spent in poorer areas, and that does sound like a policy that favours the already favoured. But in education, surely things are not quite so simple. There is a worry, among those who agree with Dobson, about a proposal for super A-levels to challenge super-clever children. Dobson parses the idea this way:

“This idea that gifted children need super A-levels comes from people who want a privileged minority to be able to look down

Read the rest


Science Studies

Nov 2nd, 2002 | By

In 1994, Paul R. Gross and Norman Levitt published Higher Superstition,
and the pigeons have still not recovered from the shock of that particular cat.
Higher Superstition is a funny-painful ‘deconstruction’ or rather demolition
of an array of trendy anti-science ‘studies’, stances, branches of putative
scholarship: Postmodern, cultural constructivist, feminist, sociological, environmental.
Most of these orientations are on the left, although it has been frequently
pointed out (e.g. by Richard J. Evans in his article on Postmodern history on
this site) that PoMo is at least as useful to the right as it is to the left
and that there are indeed right-wing Postmodernists. But the majority of the
attacks on science come from the left (and could be … Read the rest



David Lodge thinks *

Nov 2nd, 2002 | Filed by

Which tells us more about consciousness, fiction or cognitive science?… Read the rest



Credentials *

Nov 2nd, 2002 | Filed by

Philosophers uncover conceptual connections and thus help to make ethical debate better informed.… Read the rest



Bizarre claims *

Nov 2nd, 2002 | Filed by

Philosophers will insist on getting Dawkins wrong.… Read the rest



Truth and lies *

Nov 1st, 2002 | Filed by

Bernard Williams defends the truth, while also exploring when we need to tell lies.… Read the rest



Anyone’s neighbour *

Nov 1st, 2002 | Filed by

‘It could be you’. Perhaps a more useful suggestion about the Nobel prize than about the lottery.… Read the rest



Tragic view *

Nov 1st, 2002 | Filed by

Are John Gray and Steven Pinker saying the same dismal thing about human hopes, and are they right to be saying it?… Read the rest



Cargo cult science *

Nov 1st, 2002 | Filed by

‘Statistics show’ is a mere rhetorical device in education research, used to support whatever policy one favors. Research in cognitive psychology shows promise.… Read the rest



Mormon correctness *

Oct 31st, 2002 | Filed by

Even practicing Mormons can have a hard time conforming to the rules at Brigham Young University.… Read the rest



One way to introduce the two cultures *

Oct 31st, 2002 | Filed by

A computer scientist teaches liberal arts students an intelligent skepticism about computer technology…and what binary numbers are.… Read the rest



Where groupthink can lead *

Oct 30th, 2002 | Filed by

The Salem witch trials are interesting not because of the occult aspect but as an example of ‘senseless self-destruction’.… Read the rest



Oh, brilliant, pay the fun teachers more *

Oct 30th, 2002 | Filed by

Link lecturers’ pay to how popular they are with students? Might there be some drawbacks to that idea? … Read the rest



Rorty on Williams on truth *

Oct 30th, 2002 | Filed by

Are analytic philosophers ‘hard-working public relations agents for contemporary institutions and practices’? Or are neo-pragmatists hard-working Artful Dodgers…… Read the rest



Higher Superstition Revisited: an interview with Norman Levitt

Oct 30th, 2002 | By Ophelia Benson

Paul R. Gross and Norman Levitt’s book Higher Superstition appeared
in 1994, rattled a good many cages, and prompted the Sokal Hoax. The book describes
a bizarre situation in American universities in which academics in various (mostly
new-minted) fields such as Cultural Studies, Literary Theory, and Science Studies,
plus a few more familiar ones such as Sociology, Comparative Literature and
the like, make a career of writing about science without taking the trouble
to know anything about it. Gross and Levitt have a good deal of fun exposing
the absurd mistakes perpetrated by people who rhapsodise about quantum mechanics
and chaos theory without having the faintest idea what they’re talking about.


But hilarity aside, there are serious issues involved. The … Read the rest



Oh, rapture

Oct 29th, 2002 3:40 pm | By

Tim LaHaye was on the US public radio show Fresh Air last night. He is a minister, a fundamentalist, a pillar of far-right politics, a former honcho in the Moral Majority, and…a best-selling novelist. To put it mildly. He is the co-author of a series which has sold (I cringe to relate) 50 million copies. The ‘left behind’ series. For those who have the good fortune not to know what on earth that is, the subject matter is ‘the Rapture’. You know. When Jesus shouts in the sky and all the believers are instantly taken up into heaven, to leave the rest of us down here to be tortured for all eternity (after a great deal of to-ing and fro-ing … Read the rest



Scientists were unpopular then too *

Oct 29th, 2002 | Filed by

Even in that supposed heyday of reason, attacks on freethinkers were a favourite sport.… Read the rest