All entries by this author

Pets I Mean Companion Animals *

Oct 14th, 2003 | Filed by

Do we spend too much money on them? Should we like them less and people more?… Read the rest



Woolly Jumpers and Even Woollier Language *

Oct 14th, 2003 | Filed by

The aim was to ‘reduce a text to a kind of fine powder of politico-sexual assumptions.’… Read the rest



Lie Back and Enjoy It

Oct 13th, 2003 9:47 pm | By

This is a hilarious piece. Katha Pollitt is pretty good at being hilarious. But of course she has good material here. Why are conservatives always bleating and moaning? Have they not noticed? Yo! Those heavy steel things in your hands? Those are the levers of power!

Why can’t they just admit it, throw a big party and dance on the table with lampshades on their heads? Why are they always claiming to be excluded and silenced because most English professors are Democrats? Why must they re-prosecute Alger Hiss whenever Susan Sarandon gives a speech or Al Franken goes after Bill O’Reilly? If I were a conservative, I would think of those liberal professors spending their lives grading papers on

Read the rest


Damp Squibs

Oct 13th, 2003 4:30 pm | By

It’s a very handy thing, having a Fashionable Dictionary and a Rhetoric Guide. Because whenever people who have little or nothing of substance to say, resort to mere abuse instead, it’s useful instead of merely boring and time-wasting. You can just slide it into one or the other and hey presto, your correspondent has done a little work for you.

For instance, there’s ‘Meaningless Sarcasm’. Addressing your opponent (or rather the person you’re attempting to engage, who wandered off in boredom long ago) as ‘little Ms X’ or ‘little Mr Y’. Has the disadvantage of making one sound about seven years old, but if one is delusional enough, it passes for wit.

Or there’s that old favourite, ‘I’m embarrassed for … Read the rest



Why No Lampshades on Their Heads? *

Oct 13th, 2003 | Filed by

Why do US conservatives keep pretending they’re a persecuted minority?… Read the rest



Oh Dear, the National Review? *

Oct 13th, 2003 | Filed by

Yes, but the piece on the diversity essay is hilarious.… Read the rest



Science Within Reason *

Oct 13th, 2003 | Filed by

Review of Susan Haack’s new book.… Read the rest



The Politics of Sensitivity Training *

Oct 13th, 2003 | Filed by

Defining political protest as hate crime, if the protest is against the Vatican.… Read the rest



An Unfortunate Meme

Oct 13th, 2003 2:17 am | By

There was a very interesting review in The Nation last month, that talks about a subject that’s been coming up a lot lately: the tendency of apologists for the Catholic church to equate criticism of the church or the Pope or Vatican policy or the religion itself, with intolerance or hate crime or a kind of racism. It seems to be a bit of a meme, in fact. No doubt the archbishop of Birmingham had just been reading Philip Jenkins’ new book and picked up some ideas. The ideas he picked up are very bad ones, as I argued in a N&C last month. The Catholic church is an institution like any other. It’s not a good idea to make … Read the rest



What Happened to Secularism? *

Oct 12th, 2003 | Filed by

Paul Kurtz considers the reasons for the retreat from science and reason in the US.… Read the rest



Catholic Church Lies About Condoms *

Oct 12th, 2003 | Filed by

Anger at claim that condoms don’t offer protection against HIV.… Read the rest



Whither Canonicity? *

Oct 12th, 2003 | Filed by

Nobody ever said canon formation was easy. Robert McCrum on The List.… Read the rest



Lists Are Always Fun *

Oct 12th, 2003 | Filed by

The Observer offers its list of the best 100 novels.… Read the rest



The Fame Game

Oct 11th, 2003 7:44 pm | By

This column by David Aaronovitch seems apposite to something we were talking about the other day – the cult of celebrity, or in Leo Braudy’s memorable phrase, the frenzy of renown. It’s not just a matter of electing conspicuously unqualified people to powerful jobs on the basis of nothing at all apart from pure Fame, though that’s more than bad enough. It’s also what fame, or perhaps a certain kind of fame, can do to the people who have it.

an American sports sociologist, Jeff Benedict,…had been asked by sports authorities to collect data to contradict the perception that many athletes were committing crimes against women. Benedict interviewed 300 athletes, victims, lawyers, cops and groupies and discovered that, unfortunately, the

Read the rest


BHL the Anti-anti-American *

Oct 11th, 2003 | Filed by

Bernard-Henri Levy looks at the concurrent rise of anti-Semitism and anti-Americanism.… Read the rest



Paradigms U Like

Oct 11th, 2003 | By Ophelia Benson

The hostility to science goes back for millennia. We don’t like brute facts, we don’t like having to check our wishes and hopes against the reality of how the world is. We’ll submit to the necessity for survival purposes, we’ll learn what we need to know of leopards and rabbits, fire and ice, but beyond that we want the right to believe our fantasies. ‘May God us keep/From single vision, and Newton’s sleep!’ said Blake, and Wordsworth agreed: ‘Sweet is the lore which Nature brings;/Our meddling intellect/Mis-shapes the beauteous forms of things:–We murder to dissect.’

But there is a new kind of animus that has become conventional wisdom in many universities over the past three decades. It goes by the … Read the rest



Public Intellectuals *

Oct 10th, 2003 | Filed by

A Tory squire and a Palestinian exile, but both thought academics should reach a broad public.… Read the rest



Celebrity Equals Entitlement *

Oct 10th, 2003 | Filed by

David Aaronovitch on what footballers and other athletes think of women.… Read the rest



How It’s Done *

Oct 10th, 2003 | Filed by

Add or omit quotation marks, call it ‘superweed’ or ‘wild hybrid’ – it all adds up.… Read the rest



Initiation into Rites of Belief *

Oct 9th, 2003 | Filed by

Erin O’Connor on Helena Echlin’s dysphoria as a graduate student at Yale.… Read the rest