All entries by this author

More on Academic Conformity *

Oct 3rd, 2003 | Filed by

Critical Mass is hearing from people.… Read the rest



Environmental Propaganda Wars *

Oct 3rd, 2003 | Filed by

Entrenched positions prevent both sides from evaluating arguments on the merits.… Read the rest



What’s Going On In There? *

Oct 3rd, 2003 | Filed by

What happens to the brain and to consciousness after trauma?… Read the rest



Not a Very Bright Idea

Oct 3rd, 2003 | By Jeremy Stangroom

When Tony Blair first became leader of the Labour Party in 1994, the Sun
newspaper, a British tabloid, took to calling him ‘Bambi’, presumably in the
hope that the nickname would become established in the public consciousness.
It did not, of course, for it lacked any kind of resonance with what people
could believe about Blair. He wasn’t a child, his leadership was anything but
childlike, and he lacked the requisite number of legs to be a baby deer. Not
discouraged, the Sun was at it again in 2001, this time when Iain Duncan
Smith became leader of the Conservative Party. In what was probably a desperate
attempt to establish his man of the people credentials, it started to call … Read the rest



Think Like Us

Oct 2nd, 2003 8:00 pm | By

There is an excellent post at Critical Mass – starting, interestingly enough, from a comment on Crooked Timber. So we’re in a hall of mirrors here, or the land of infinite regress, or something. Bloggers commenting on bloggers commenting on bloggers commenting on (finally) an actual newspaper column. But that’s all right. The truth is, plenty of blog posts are better than plenty of newspaper columns. And this one is very good indeed. Erin O’Connor quotes Timothy Burke on the excessively narrow terms in which charges of political orthodoxy in universities are framed.

Virtually anything that departed from a carefully groomed sense of acceptable innovation, including ideas and positions distinctively to the left and some that are neither left nor

Read the rest


Uh Oh *

Oct 2nd, 2003 | Filed by

Do we really need ‘criticism’ of science similar to that of ‘art, literature, movies, architecture’?… Read the rest



Remembering Said *

Oct 2nd, 2003 | Filed by

A polemicist and literary warrior in the tradition of Swift.… Read the rest



We’re Close Enough, Dammit! *

Oct 2nd, 2003 | Filed by

Touchy-feely blather not the best way to relax after a hard day?… Read the rest



Are GM Fears Justified? *

Oct 2nd, 2003 | Filed by

Two out of three GM strains ‘should not be grown’.… Read the rest



Secularism Meets the Hijab

Oct 1st, 2003 7:19 pm | By

This is always an interesting subject. There are so many boxes one could put it in, for one thing. How unhelpful, self-cancelling, and ill-founded talk of ‘rights’ can be. How difficult or indeed impossible it can be to meet everyone’s desires and wishes – which is just another way of saying how self-cancelling talk of ‘rights’ can be. How difficult or impossible it can be to decide what is really fair and just to all parties, which is yet another way of saying the same thing. How incompatible some goods are, how irreconcilable some culture clashes are, how differently we see things depending on how we frame them. If our chosen frame is religion, or identity politics, or multiculturalism, or … Read the rest



Said Inspired but Also Forestalled *

Oct 1st, 2003 | Filed by

Rejecting all criticism as Orientalist is not what a scholar should do.… Read the rest



Head Scarves, Rights, Secularism *

Oct 1st, 2003 | Filed by

Rights talk doesn’t help when two ‘rights’ are incompatible.… Read the rest



Review of Bountiful Harvest *

Oct 1st, 2003 | Filed by

Thomas DeGregori examines antitechnology movements that keep the world’s poor in poverty.… Read the rest



Sympathy for the…

Oct 1st, 2003 12:37 am | By

Norm Geras’ blog has an excellent post on a recent Guardian column by Karen Armstrong. I thought it was excellent when I first read it, before Norm demonstrated what dazzlingly good taste he has by posting a, a, well, not to put too fine a point on it a rave review of B&W. I did a Note and Comment on Armstrong myself a few weeks or months ago, making a similar point. She’s too determined to be understanding and sympathetic and inclusive and non-Eurocentric and non-Orientalist about Islam, too unwilling to just give it up and be ‘judgmental’. Having read some of her memoirs and other books on religious subjects, I take her stance to have more to do with … Read the rest



Philip Pullman Worries About Testing *

Sep 30th, 2003 | Filed by

Teaching for the test makes children hate literature, Pullman says.… Read the rest



Confusing Politics with Conformity *

Sep 30th, 2003 | Filed by

‘Conservative’ can be just code for ‘different from me’.… Read the rest



Murder in the Name of Tradition *

Sep 30th, 2003 | Filed by

‘The justice system will come down on you like a ton of bricks’ for so-called ‘crimes of honour.’… Read the rest



The Virtue of Innovation and the Technological Imperative

Sep 30th, 2003 | By Andrew Apel

The rise of the precautionary principle in public policy and international
relations has called into question the role technological innovation should
be allowed to play in society. [1] According to the precautionary principle, no
novel technology, regardless of its benefits, should be deployed if it poses
risks to human health or the environment. [2] Under some interpretations
of the principle, these risks need not even be testable hypotheses, but may
merely be posited. [3] In the latter case, the principle merely
says that technological innovation is too dangerous to be allowed.


Critics of technological advance have also invented a doctrine which is antithetical
to the precautionary principle, and dubbed it the ‘technological imperative.’
In … Read the rest



Bubble Car Blues

Sep 29th, 2003 8:35 pm | By

This is what you get when ‘offensive’ is the shut-up word of the day. You get archbishops complaining that the BBC is reporting on the church, and equating criticism with hostility and bias.

But there are clearly elements or individuals, mainly – as far as I can tell – within news and current affairs, who seem to approach the Catholic Church with great hostility. Certainly the Catholic community is fed up seeing a public service broadcaster using the licence fee to pay unscrupulous reporters trying to re-circulate old news and to broadcast programmes that are so biased and hostile. Enough is enough.

So – what would a friendly and unbiased report on the Catholic church look like then? An admiring … Read the rest



BBC ‘Hostile’ to Catholic Church? *

Sep 29th, 2003 | Filed by

Archbishop equates criticism with hostility, calls it offensive.… Read the rest