All entries by this author

Totalizing Ideologies *

Dec 7th, 2003 | Filed by

What are the words to ‘The Red Flag’ again?… Read the rest



Scientists Slam Nobel Loser *

Dec 7th, 2003 | Filed by

Supporters of creationist claim he is shunned because of his religion, but colleagues don’t believe it.… Read the rest



The Second Half of the List *

Dec 7th, 2003 | Filed by

McEwan, Motion, Paulin, Pinker, Tomalin, Tremain, Tyler, Warner, Weldon.… Read the rest



Barnes, Byatt, Drabble, Holmes, Holroyd *

Dec 7th, 2003 | Filed by

Crick, Fenton, Kermode – writers choose their favorite books of the year. … Read the rest



Predecessor of the Fashionable Dictionary *

Dec 6th, 2003 | Filed by

Ambrose Bierce’s version of the satirical lexicon.… Read the rest



Danny Postel Reviews John Gray *

Dec 6th, 2003 | Filed by

Twists and turns on the ideological road.… Read the rest



Homophobic Reggae Star ‘Should Be Arrested’ *

Dec 6th, 2003 | Filed by

Gay rights group call for the arrest of reggae star Bounty Killer.… Read the rest



Executives of ‘Radio Machete’ Found Guilty *

Dec 6th, 2003 | Filed by

They used a radio station and a newspaper to inflame ethnic hatred that led to genocide in Rwanda.… Read the rest



Habermas on Adorno *

Dec 6th, 2003 | Filed by

There were irritating gaps in the Frankfurt canon of philosophers.… Read the rest



Radio Machete

Dec 6th, 2003 2:07 am | By

Ah, and just when I was talking about Rwanda, here is this story. How very interesting. The first time media executives have been convicted since the Nurenberg trials. Well that’s too bad, for a start, because Serbian radio was also used to whip up murderous ethnic hatreds. But it’s better than nothing.

In the first verdict of its kind since the Nuremberg trials, an international court today convicted three Rwandan news media executives of genocide for helping to incite a killing spree by machete-wielding gangs who slaughtered about 800,000 Tutsis in neighboring Rwanda in early 1994. A three judge panel found that the three defendants used a radio station and a twice-monthly newspaper to inflame ethnic hatred that eventually led

Read the rest


Lots of People

Dec 5th, 2003 9:48 pm | By

Another interesting point at normblog. Well I can’t help it if he says something that catches my attention twice in three days. That’s just how things fall out sometimes. And really, this is something I’ve been mulling over for a couple of weeks or more, ever since re-reading Philip Gourevitch’s book on Rwanda. Longer than that really, maybe since last spring – maybe around the time Fareed Zakaria’s book on democracy was published. It wasn’t the book itself (which I haven’t read in any case) that sparked the pondering, it was the air of surprise in some of the reviews, that someone could make some shrewd and pertinent comments about democracy which recognized that democracy has some tensions or dangers. … Read the rest



Non-Mainstream Opinion and Blogs *

Dec 5th, 2003 | Filed by

There are more pro-war left than anti-war left bloggers.… Read the rest



Edward Skidelsky on George Steiner *

Dec 5th, 2003 | Filed by

Jeremiads are no substitute for understanding.… Read the rest



What Is He Laughing At?

Dec 5th, 2003 1:58 am | By

There was more of interest in that Start the Week than just the tv drama about the MMR issue. There was also a guy who’s written a book called A Dictionary of Idiocy, which is interesting because we have a little dictionary ourselves, so we’re interested in other examples of the genre. This one doesn’t sound much good though, frankly, at least not if the writer is anything to go by. He kept laughing too much, when nothing was all that funny. It’s always so embarrassing when people do that on chat shows and the people they’re chatting with don’t join them, but in fact get less and less giggly as they get more so. There was Stephen Bayley roaring … Read the rest



What Silence?

Dec 4th, 2003 7:37 pm | By

Front Row yesterday included discussion of and a clip from a Channel 5 drama called ‘Hear the Silence’ about the controversy over the MMR jab and autism. Monday’s Start the Week also discussed the drama, with Juliet Stevenson who stars in it.

The bit of dialogue we heard on Front Row confirmed my worst expectations of what such a drama would be like. Oh great, thought I when Mark Lawson first described the subject matter. Plucky victimized parent takes on medical establishment and shows how wrong it is about everything, thus convincing everyone that MMR jab causes autism. And sure enough – the bit of dialogue was well-acted, to be sure, but it was also utterly predictable. Chilly rational uncaring … Read the rest



Paul Johnson on Art *

Dec 4th, 2003 | Filed by

He values both order and innovation, Joe Phelan says.… Read the rest



The Rich Get Richer and the Poor Get Eaten *

Dec 4th, 2003 | Filed by

Poor people are more likely to live near predators than rich people are.… Read the rest



Hi, Welcome to the Food Chain *

Dec 4th, 2003 | Filed by

We love Nature and it loves us – we taste good.… Read the rest



If I Had A Hammer: Why Logical Positivism Better Accounts for the Need for Gender and Cultural Studies

Dec 4th, 2003 | By Steven Gimbel

Women’s studies, African-American studies, gay and lesbian studies programs, and the moving of non-western and non-“traditional” studies in general out of the anthropology and sociology departments and into the academy on their own terms is the great success story of contemporary higher education. This advance has come along with, and in large part happened because of, the rising influence outside of philosophy departments of thinkers like Michel Foucault, Bruno Latour, and Judith Butler who pull on insights derived from the writings of Nietzsche. Nietzschean perspectivalism lies at the heart of the standard justification for culture studies. While the desire for the intellectual egalitarianism that accompanies perspectivalism comes from a good place, perspectivalism has well-known problems at its core that stand … Read the rest



Geography

Dec 4th, 2003 1:30 am | By

There is a very interesting post at Normblog on the whole vexed question, which I’ve mentioned a time or two here, of what exactly is ‘left’ (or ‘right’) anyway, and who gets to decide, and how do we know, and why does it matter.

I find it odd, especially given that Marc himself was a supporter of the Iraq war, that he should feel it appropriate to frame the discussion as one about moving rightward – as if it’s already pre-defined where, in this division of opinion, the authentic values of the left lie, and we can gauge from that who’s moving which way. Why couldn’t it be, rather, that the left, like pretty well the rest of the world,

Read the rest