All entries by this author

Hindutva on the Attack

Jan 8th, 2004 | By

Optimists like to think, and say, that religion and secularism can co-exist peacefully. That each has its own realm – its Nonoverlapping Magisterium, as Stephen Jay Gould so mistakenly called it – and there is no need for rivalry or conflict. That ‘science’ (which is never defined when such assertions are being made) can answer the questions in its realm, and religion can answer the questions in its. Of course, that raises the obvious question, can it really? Can religion really answer the questions that ‘science’ (i.e. rational inquiry) cannot? ‘Answer’ in what sense? In the sense of saying something? No doubt it can do that, but then so can anyone else. In the sense of saying something true? But … Read the rest



‘Our Anguish at the Wanton Destruction’ *

Jan 8th, 2004 | Filed by

Indian historians condemn attack on Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute.… Read the rest



Review of Defending Science *

Jan 8th, 2004 | Filed by

Says ‘Differentialism’ when he means ‘Deferentialism,’ but oh well.… Read the rest



Evasiveness Breeds Conspiracy Theories *

Jan 8th, 2004 | Filed by

When otherwise dependable cynics believe nonsense, there may be a reason.… Read the rest



Stephen King Has no Patience *

Jan 8th, 2004 | Filed by

For people who don’t read popular fiction.… Read the rest



Religion and Public Relations *

Jan 8th, 2004 | Filed by

Pedophile priests and Jesus-according-to-Gibson need to be carefully presented.… Read the rest



Outrage

Jan 7th, 2004 8:27 pm | By

Well, really. I’ve probably said this before…but I’ll simply have to repeat myself then. This is one of those times I just have to shake my grizzled head and croak with the Wicked Witch of the North, ‘What a world, what a world.’

A kind and helpful reader, Chris of the blog Intelligent Life, alerted me to this horrible story in a comment on another story about gangs of religious thugs terrorizing people. There’s just no end to it, it seems.

Sanika Bapat, another post-graduate scholar merely questioned, ‘‘Why did they tear a Shivaji manuscript from this library? Are they Shivaji worshippers or patriots? They are worse than any militia. We are another Taliban now.’’ People sitting outside the

Read the rest


The Dangers of Studying Mythology *

Jan 7th, 2004 | Filed by

James Laine on why he wrote about Shivaji.… Read the rest



Indian Historians Given Police Protection *

Jan 7th, 2004 | Filed by

OUP withdrew book, author apologized, but protesters attacked anyway.… Read the rest



Enlightenment Against Empire *

Jan 7th, 2004 | Filed by

Introduction to Sankar Muthu’s book on 18th century anti-imperialism.… Read the rest



‘Activists’ Attack Research Institute *

Jan 7th, 2004 | Filed by

Vandals attack Bhandarkar oriental research institute, staff, books and manuscripts.… Read the rest



Samantha Power Reviews Chomsky *

Jan 7th, 2004 | Filed by

A glib and caustic tone; exaggerated claims not backed up; but worth reading.… Read the rest



Judith Butler Superstar

Jan 6th, 2004 8:17 pm | By

Okay, what’s the deal with Judith Butler. Why does everyone who writes about her call her a celebrity or a superstar. A superstar?? Someone who teaches gender studies at Berkeley? A superstar?

Berkeley’s Judith Butler, a superstar of gender and literary studies, drew a packed house with her analysis of Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld’s bad grammar and slippery use of the term “sovereignty.”

I’m not making it up, that’s from the Boston Globe, from a story on the MLA convention. Not a very affectionate or over-impressed story, either – and yet Scott Jaschik calls Butler a superstar. Well if she got married in Las Vegas and then had the marriage annulled the next day, would we hear about it? … Read the rest



Anthropocentric Conceit *

Jan 6th, 2004 | Filed by

The creator of the fifteen-billion-year-old, multibillion-star universe thinks we’re just swell. Right?… Read the rest



Ha’aretz Meets Judith Butler *

Jan 6th, 2004 | Filed by

She’s a celebrity, she exudes charisma, followers line up for her talks. Hmm.… Read the rest



Daniel Mendelsohn on Donald Kagan *

Jan 6th, 2004 | Filed by

What does the Peloponnesian War mean in a world with only one superpower?… Read the rest



Adonis on the Veil *

Jan 6th, 2004 | Filed by

Arab poet has harsh words for the hijab and its fans.… Read the rest



Should NGOs be Accountable? *

Jan 6th, 2004 | Filed by

Who decides, and what are the criteria, and who decides that?… Read the rest



No Thank You

Jan 5th, 2004 9:52 pm | By

I read something interesting and even (very slightly) encouraging in a month-old New York Times magazine article on Pakistan by Barry Bearak.

Government by ”the mullahs” has long been a dreaded prospect by the vast majority of Pakistanis with less doctrinaire views, and the M.M.A.’s unexpected victories intensified fears that ”Talibanization” was creeping its way across the land.

It is good to know that the vast majority of Pakistanis (which I think is what that not very clear clause means: the vast majority of Pakistanis, who have less doctrinaire views, as opposed to the vast majority of Pakistanis-with-less-doctrinaire-views, which of course could be a much smaller number) dread the prospect of government by the mullahs. But it’s only a little … Read the rest



Incautious Precautionary Principle *

Jan 5th, 2004 | Filed by

Philip Stott on morally bankrupt opposition to GM crops in developing world.… Read the rest