Optimists like to think, and say, that religion and secularism can co-exist peacefully. That each has its own realm – its Nonoverlapping Magisterium, as Stephen Jay Gould so mistakenly called it – and there is no need for rivalry or conflict. That ‘science’ (which is never defined when such assertions are being made) can answer the questions in its realm, and religion can answer the questions in its. Of course, that raises the obvious question, can it really? Can religion really answer the questions that ‘science’ (i.e. rational inquiry) cannot? ‘Answer’ in what sense? In the sense of saying something? No doubt it can do that, but then so can anyone else. In the sense of saying something true? But … Read the rest
All entries by this author
‘Our Anguish at the Wanton Destruction’
Jan 8th, 2004 | Filed by Ophelia BensonIndian historians condemn attack on Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute.… Read the rest
Review of Defending Science
Jan 8th, 2004 | Filed by Ophelia BensonSays ‘Differentialism’ when he means ‘Deferentialism,’ but oh well.… Read the rest
Evasiveness Breeds Conspiracy Theories
Jan 8th, 2004 | Filed by Ophelia BensonWhen otherwise dependable cynics believe nonsense, there may be a reason.… Read the rest
Stephen King Has no Patience
Jan 8th, 2004 | Filed by Ophelia BensonFor people who don’t read popular fiction.… Read the rest
Religion and Public Relations
Jan 8th, 2004 | Filed by Ophelia BensonPedophile priests and Jesus-according-to-Gibson need to be carefully presented.… Read the rest
Outrage
Jan 7th, 2004 8:27 pm | By Ophelia BensonWell, really. I’ve probably said this before…but I’ll simply have to repeat myself then. This is one of those times I just have to shake my grizzled head and croak with the Wicked Witch of the North, ‘What a world, what a world.’
A kind and helpful reader, Chris of the blog Intelligent Life, alerted me to this horrible story in a comment on another story about gangs of religious thugs terrorizing people. There’s just no end to it, it seems.
… Read the restSanika Bapat, another post-graduate scholar merely questioned, ‘‘Why did they tear a Shivaji manuscript from this library? Are they Shivaji worshippers or patriots? They are worse than any militia. We are another Taliban now.’’ People sitting outside the
The Dangers of Studying Mythology
Jan 7th, 2004 | Filed by Ophelia BensonJames Laine on why he wrote about Shivaji.… Read the rest
Indian Historians Given Police Protection
Jan 7th, 2004 | Filed by Ophelia BensonOUP withdrew book, author apologized, but protesters attacked anyway.… Read the rest
Enlightenment Against Empire
Jan 7th, 2004 | Filed by Ophelia BensonIntroduction to Sankar Muthu’s book on 18th century anti-imperialism.… Read the rest
‘Activists’ Attack Research Institute
Jan 7th, 2004 | Filed by Ophelia BensonVandals attack Bhandarkar oriental research institute, staff, books and manuscripts.… Read the rest
Samantha Power Reviews Chomsky
Jan 7th, 2004 | Filed by Ophelia BensonA glib and caustic tone; exaggerated claims not backed up; but worth reading.… Read the rest
Judith Butler Superstar
Jan 6th, 2004 8:17 pm | By Ophelia BensonOkay, what’s the deal with Judith Butler. Why does everyone who writes about her call her a celebrity or a superstar. A superstar?? Someone who teaches gender studies at Berkeley? A superstar?
Berkeley’s Judith Butler, a superstar of gender and literary studies, drew a packed house with her analysis of Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld’s bad grammar and slippery use of the term “sovereignty.”
I’m not making it up, that’s from the Boston Globe, from a story on the MLA convention. Not a very affectionate or over-impressed story, either – and yet Scott Jaschik calls Butler a superstar. Well if she got married in Las Vegas and then had the marriage annulled the next day, would we hear about it? … Read the rest
Anthropocentric Conceit
Jan 6th, 2004 | Filed by Ophelia BensonThe creator of the fifteen-billion-year-old, multibillion-star universe thinks we’re just swell. Right?… Read the rest
Ha’aretz Meets Judith Butler
Jan 6th, 2004 | Filed by Ophelia BensonShe’s a celebrity, she exudes charisma, followers line up for her talks. Hmm.… Read the rest
Daniel Mendelsohn on Donald Kagan
Jan 6th, 2004 | Filed by Ophelia BensonWhat does the Peloponnesian War mean in a world with only one superpower?… Read the rest
Adonis on the Veil
Jan 6th, 2004 | Filed by Ophelia BensonArab poet has harsh words for the hijab and its fans.… Read the rest
Should NGOs be Accountable?
Jan 6th, 2004 | Filed by Ophelia BensonWho decides, and what are the criteria, and who decides that?… Read the rest
No Thank You
Jan 5th, 2004 9:52 pm | By Ophelia BensonI read something interesting and even (very slightly) encouraging in a month-old New York Times magazine article on Pakistan by Barry Bearak.
Government by ”the mullahs” has long been a dreaded prospect by the vast majority of Pakistanis with less doctrinaire views, and the M.M.A.’s unexpected victories intensified fears that ”Talibanization” was creeping its way across the land.
It is good to know that the vast majority of Pakistanis (which I think is what that not very clear clause means: the vast majority of Pakistanis, who have less doctrinaire views, as opposed to the vast majority of Pakistanis-with-less-doctrinaire-views, which of course could be a much smaller number) dread the prospect of government by the mullahs. But it’s only a little … Read the rest
Incautious Precautionary Principle
Jan 5th, 2004 | Filed by Ophelia BensonPhilip Stott on morally bankrupt opposition to GM crops in developing world.… Read the rest