All entries by this author

Thomas Frank on the Elitism Myth *

Mar 9th, 2004 | Filed by

In which up is down, out is in, no is yes.… Read the rest



Stanley Milgram Admired ‘Candid Camera’ *

Mar 9th, 2004 | Filed by

Allen Funt believed he could reveal how people respond to societal pressures.… Read the rest



Just Making It Up Can Be Risky *

Mar 9th, 2004 | Filed by

Clinical psychology ought to be based on research.… Read the rest



GM Go Ahead in the UK *

Mar 9th, 2004 | Filed by

About time too!… Read the rest



Fifty Fifty?

Mar 8th, 2004 7:10 pm | By

One question we keep hearing a lot in relation to this discussion of religion is one along the lines of ‘Why bother?’ Why bother to argue about religion, or to analyze it, or to point out weak arguments some of its defenders use? What is the point? Religion is a need, it’s always been there, it’s probably hard-wired, people aren’t going to give it up, arguments are beside the point, you’re wasting your time. Well, one, I’m not entirely sure that’s true. Not in all places and all times, and if not there and then, then not in general either. That is, I think there may be a confusion between what is hard-wired and what is simply heavily reinforced by … Read the rest



What’s the Aramaic for ‘Popcorn’? *

Mar 8th, 2004 | Filed by

A handy lexicon for moviegoers.… Read the rest



67% Chance That God Exists *

Mar 8th, 2004 | Filed by

‘Scientist’ starts from absurd premise and arrives at ridiculous conclusion.… Read the rest



Norm Geras Encounters Some Nonsense *

Mar 8th, 2004 | Filed by

And wonders if there’s a way to decide whether it’s right or wrong.… Read the rest



Using the Word ‘Genocide’ *

Mar 8th, 2004 | Filed by

Turkish scholars challenge government version of 1915 Armenian genocide.… Read the rest



Back From Syracuse, Dr. Heidegger? *

Mar 8th, 2004 | Filed by

What is it with intellectuals and dictators? Mark Lilla has a look.… Read the rest



Hemingway at his Most Eloquent *

Mar 7th, 2004 | Filed by

Bulls are great – they don’t write, they’re not queer, they’re not old women, and you can kill them.… Read the rest



Like Gibbon and Frazer Only in Bulk *

Mar 7th, 2004 | Filed by

William Vollmann’s seven volume work is swept away on a flood of logorrhea.… Read the rest



Postpositivist Realism *

Mar 6th, 2004 | Filed by

Identity is fluid, until we have to deal with other people.… Read the rest



That’s an Accomplishment? *

Mar 6th, 2004 | Filed by

‘one of literary theory’s accomplishments…has been its bid to protect “the privacy of its language.”‘… Read the rest



Some People Disapprove of French Ban *

Mar 5th, 2004 | Filed by

US State Department, al Qaeda frown at ban on religious attire.… Read the rest



Ah, Sweet Mystery *

Mar 5th, 2004 | Filed by

Popular science books ought to help nonspecialists distinguish sense from nonsense. … Read the rest



UK Still Dithering About GM Crops *

Mar 5th, 2004 | Filed by

Parliarmentary committee calls for more trials.… Read the rest



Chris Mooney on ‘Sound Science’ *

Mar 5th, 2004 | Filed by

The phrases ‘sound science’ and ‘peer review’ may not mean what you think.… Read the rest



What We Don’t See

Mar 4th, 2004 8:08 pm | By

What was that I was saying only a day or two ago about smelly little orthodoxies and the hijab? This article from the BBC certainly gives a good illustration of what I mean. Two mentions of Muslim opposition to the ban, and no mentions at all of Muslim support for the ban. If you don’t already know a little about the subject, and read that article, you’ll be left with the impression that Muslims who have any opinion on the matter are opposed. But that is simply not true. Forty percent of Muslim women support the ban, according to news reports I’ve seen.

Most of France’s political parties, and around 70% of the population, support the ban which some Muslim

Read the rest


Elephants Can Be Irritating *

Mar 4th, 2004 | Filed by

There are good reasons why Africans don’t view their fauna with the same sentimentality that Europeans do.… Read the rest