Pretend science is like politics and there is always a middle ground.… Read the rest
All entries by this author
Media Storms Can Mislead
Jan 29th, 2004 |
Filed by Ophelia Benson
Undue attention to cloning distorts public understanding of the field.… Read the rest
Corruption? Yawn
Jan 28th, 2004 7:58 pm | By Ophelia BensonCorruption in US politics is a hardy perennial issue. Reliable, sturdy, always there; something to count on in a disconcerting world. This is, of course, because nothing is ever done about it, and the people who ought to care about it mostly don’t, and the people who ought to pay a penalty for engaging in it don’t, and the people who ought to be paying attention mostly aren’t, and the people who ought to be bringing it to the attention of the people who ought to be paying attention and ought to care mostly aren’t. It’s all a bit discouraging, frankly. Or to put it another way, it’s completely disgusting and infuriating, and an outrage, and absurd, and blindingly obviously … Read the rest
The Uses of Nanotechnology
Jan 28th, 2004 |
Filed by Ophelia Benson
High-profile opponents take an unbalanced approach, say ethicists.… Read the rest
Misconceptions Could Harm the Poor
Jan 28th, 2004 |
Filed by Ophelia Benson
Bioethics Centre and Peter Singer against Prince Charles on nanotechnology.… Read the rest
After After After Theory
Jan 28th, 2004 |
Filed by Ophelia Benson
Yet another postmortem.… Read the rest
Why Don’t People See?
Jan 28th, 2004 |
Filed by Ophelia Benson
Paul Berman lists six causes of partial vision.… Read the rest
Desperation
Jan 27th, 2004 9:44 pm | By Ophelia BensonThis is funny. Hilarious, in fact. A blogger and frequent blog-commenter who is well-known for an unattractive combination of heavy sarcasm and rudeness made safe by anonymity, tries another bit of heavy sarcasm that falls rather flat, and contradicts himself in the process. Compare three statements:
“High-Caste Hindu”: Irreverently Humorous or Casually Colonialist and Racist? Chun Informs, You Decide
Do you assume that Spivak calling herself this would make it any less casually colonialist or racist (if in fact that’s the proper description–about which I, as I wrote, have no opinion)?
I find your points to be cogent, but I believe you must detect a patronizing note in Inglis’s description.
Ah. You decide. I have no opinion. But on the … Read the rest
Do I What?!
Jan 27th, 2004 8:52 pm | By Ophelia BensonThis article starts off with a pretty bizarre story.
The other day, I was reading an interview with Democratic presidential candidate Howard Dean in Newsweek when I had to stop and check that it was indeed Newsweek and not, say, Christianity Today. Yes, it was indeed Newsweek. And, after a series of questions about a variety of public policy issues, Dean was asked, out of the clear blue, the following question: “Do you see Jesus Christ as the son of God and believe in him as the route to salvation and eternal life?”
Really? Really?? I never read Newsweek, so I don’t know, but that is such a weird question that it strains credulity. I mean, was … Read the rest
What is History For?
Jan 27th, 2004 |
Filed by Ophelia Benson
Should students be learning vocational skills at the expense of substantive history?… Read the rest
A Religious Test for Public Office?
Jan 27th, 2004 |
Filed by Ophelia Benson
Why did Newsweek ask Dean if he sees JC as the son of the deity?… Read the rest
Conflict Between Solidarity and Diversity
Jan 26th, 2004 |
Filed by Ophelia Benson
Progressives want both but they’re not entirely compatible.… Read the rest
Bubble-Bath for the Soul
Jan 26th, 2004 |
Filed by Ophelia Benson
Seven Habits, Fifth Discipline, Timeless Mind, Chicken Soup – is there no end to the bilge?… Read the rest
Dude, Where’s My Site of Hegemonic Dominance?
Jan 26th, 2004 2:04 am | By Ophelia BensonJohn Holbo has a very sly post on the tireless Bad Writing subject on his blog. He read the first three issues of the PMLA – Proceedings of the Modern Language Association – for 2003 cover to cover, twice. (Then he had a complete blood transfusion and is well on the way to recovery – now cut that out.) And he has some thoughts.
First he quotes Judith Butler explaining why bad writing is necessary and good:
… Read the restThe accused then responds that “if what he says could be said in terms of ordinary language he would probably have done so in the first place.” Understanding what the critical intellectual has to say, Marcuse goes on, “presupposes the collapse and invalidation
Reading For Something
Jan 25th, 2004 5:06 pm | By Ophelia BensonOne thing (but not the only thing) that prompted this train of thought (or perhaps bus of rumination or minivan of woolgathering or rollerskate of idle daydreaming) was something I read a few days ago in another of Dwight Macdonald’s letters, this one from January 1946, when Macdonald was editing his own magazine Politics.
… Read the restI suppose you’ve read by now Simone Weil’s article on The Iliad. The response to it has surprised me; I thought it was a great political article, dealing with the moral questions implicit in the terrible events one reads about in every day’s newspaper, which was why I played it up so prominently in the issue…Nothing I’ve printed yet seems to have made so
Flawed Theory Leads to False Convictions
Jan 25th, 2004 |
Filed by Ophelia Benson
Ministers were warned about Munchausen Syndrome By Proxy in 1996.… Read the rest
Shakespeare Test Dropped
Jan 25th, 2004 |
Filed by Ophelia Benson
More than half the marks could be awarded without students having to read any Shakespeare.… Read the rest
Integrated, Redundant Approach
Jan 24th, 2004 |
Filed by Ophelia Benson
US National Academy of Sciences on best way to confine genetically engineered organisms.… Read the rest
Review of Philosophy of Science Today
Jan 24th, 2004 |
Filed by Ophelia Benson
Astronomers study stars, philosophers of science study astronomers.… Read the rest
What Was the Question Again?
Jan 23rd, 2004 9:19 pm | By Ophelia BensonI’ve been thinking a good deal about focus lately. About relevance, subject matter, connections. The competing merits of breadth and intensity, range and depth. About how to think about such things, and how to decide between them – metaquestions again. I seem to think about metaquestions a lot – but then that’s not surprising, is it; B&W is essentially about metaquestions. At least I think it is. That’s one of the metaquestions I’ve been thinking about – what is B&W about.
Not that I don’t know, or don’t think I know, or think I don’t know. I do think I know. Or at least I know I have an opinion. But there could be other opinions – and in fact … Read the rest