Does multiculturalism lead to cultural relativism? What about the universal standards of human rights?… Read the rest
All entries by this author
Sucking Up to Judith Butler
Jul 6th, 2004 | Filed by Ophelia BensonSuperstar, classic, defining work, platinum album, seminal work, provocative, immense success, etc.… Read the rest
The Fahrenheit 9/11 Files
Jul 6th, 2004 2:30 am | By Ophelia BensonAnd now to be serious again. Or maybe not so much serious as slightly less egomaniacal. The discussion of Michael Moore’s new movie rages on. Or not really rages, perhaps, but several people are talking about it. Todd Gitlin, for example, who has some reservations –
… Read the restBut now a pause for a moment of conscience. Let intellect have its due. Moore cuts plenty of corners, so how good can that be? Compelling? Useful? Moore specializes in hodgepodge. He jokes his way past the rough edges. He’s neither journalist nor documentarian, for he doesn’t set out to discover what he doesn’t already know. To patronize Michael Moore by calling him useful is to give him a pass for shoddy work, sloppy
Moore Could be Better and Still Be Moore
Jul 5th, 2004 | Filed by Ophelia Benson‘He could show us that war kills and Bush is appalling, and yet be more scrupulous.’… Read the rest
Arab News Media and the ‘Blood of Martyrs’
Jul 5th, 2004 | Filed by Ophelia Benson‘al Qaeda has become mainstream and being part of the movement is “cool” in the eyes of young people.’… Read the rest
The ‘No Ectoplasm Clause’
Jul 5th, 2004 | Filed by Ophelia BensonMassimo Pigliucci on the neurobiology of regret.… Read the rest
Tupac Shakur not Some Sort of Byron
Jul 5th, 2004 | Filed by Ophelia BensonJohn McWhorter says rap teaches ‘recreational outrage.’… Read the rest
High Art v Low is a False Dichotomy
Jul 5th, 2004 | Filed by Ophelia Benson‘In America, even the intellectuals are anti-intellectual.’… Read the rest
The Hubble’s Last Years?
Jul 5th, 2004 | Filed by Ophelia BensonNASA has canceled missions to service telescope.… Read the rest
Machiavellian Monkeys
Jul 5th, 2004 | By Carl ZimmerOur brains are huge, particularly if you take into consideration the relative size of our bodies. Generally, the proportion of brain to body is pretty tight among mammals. But the human brain is seven times bigger than what you’d predict from the size of our body. Six million years ago, hominid brains were about a third the size they are today, comparable to a chimp’s. So what accounts for the big boom? It would be flattering ourselves to say that the cause was something we are proud of–our ability to talk, or our gifts with tools. Certainly, our brains show signs of being adapted for these sorts of things (consider the language gene FOXP2). But those adaptations probably were … Read the rest
John Sutherland Deplores Soggy Platitudes
Jul 4th, 2004 | Filed by Ophelia BensonNo one reading this blah-ridden document would guess how serious the crisis in arts funding is.… Read the rest
Louis Menand is a Tosser, Publisher Says
Jul 4th, 2004 | Filed by Ophelia BensonHelps to have a sense of humour, to get point of Eats, Shoots & Leaves.… Read the rest
Sudden Doubling of Known Planet Population
Jul 3rd, 2004 | Filed by Ophelia BensonHubble telescope has found nearly 100 new planets.… Read the rest
Skull Fuels Homo erectus Debate
Jul 3rd, 2004 | Filed by Ophelia BensonSmall skull could show diversity within species, or different species.… Read the rest
Carl Zimmer on a New Hominid Find
Jul 3rd, 2004 | Filed by Ophelia BensonIs human development straight or branching? How important were long legs and big brains?… Read the rest
Big Al
Jul 3rd, 2004 1:07 am | By Ophelia BensonThat article of Steven Waldman’s has sent me to dear old Alexis de Tocqueville, the darling percipient frog that he is. Because Waldman’s whole schtick in that article is just exactly the kind of thing Tocqueville, and, inspired by him, John Stuart Mill, had in mind. The old majority opinion trick – the old ‘We all think this so you’d better think it too or else, and never mind whether it’s true or not just shut up and think what you’re told.’ I actually don’t think Waldman is really talking about Kerry there, I think that’s just a pretext – a disguise, a mask, a beard for what he really wants to say, which is that Most Americans believe in … Read the rest
Tony Judt on Edward Said
Jul 2nd, 2004 | Filed by Ophelia BensonFrowned on overfamiliarity with “theory” at the expense of close textual reading.… Read the rest
Guardian List of 101 Women ‘Intellectuals’
Jul 2nd, 2004 | Filed by Ophelia BensonDesperate list includes singers, actors, novelists, fashion designers.… Read the rest
Proud to be Abnormal
Jul 1st, 2004 9:10 pm | By Ophelia BensonWe’ve seen some stupid stuff in the You-Have-to-Believe-in-God department, but this pile of steaming nonsense in Slate is really – well, hard to believe. Get this part, for example:
… Read the restBut in general, most Republicans and most Democrats are pretty religious. The stark differences are at the extremes of each party, and, as so often is the case, the big question is whether the extremes will define the party as a whole. Most Republicans aren’t conservative fundamentalists, although it sometimes seems that way given the proclivities of the leadership. And the Democrats have their own version of that same dilemma, and it’s affecting the most important arena there is-this year’s presidential race: Will Kerry’s Democrats act like the Party of Secularists
Polio Vaccinations can Resume in Nigeria
Jul 1st, 2004 | Filed by Ophelia BensonConfirmation that Kano will start vaccinating again is huge relief to WHO.… Read the rest