Lucasta Miller on radically free, independent, autonomous Susan Sontag.… Read the rest
All entries by this author
Todd Gitlin on Bad versus Good Reporting
Jan 22nd, 2005 | Filed by Ophelia BensonRumors of death of aspirations for truth in favor of mere “perspective” are greatly exaggerated. … Read the rest
Singer Takes Bush Administration to Task
Jan 22nd, 2005 | Filed by Ophelia BensonFor allowing ideology to trump empiricism and sound reasoning.… Read the rest
What’s Not To Like About The Academic Bill of Rights
Jan 22nd, 2005 | By Graham LarkinLocking up my bike on the way to the office on May 3, 2004, I noticed that events were underway in the large pavilion pitched in front of the Hoover Center, the right-wing think tank overshadowing my office in the Nathan Cummings Art Building at Stanford University. The voice on the microphone was introducing prominent ultra-conservative intellectual David Horowitz. As the representative for private universities on the steering committee of the California Conference of the American Association of University Professors (CA-AAUP), I had recently taken a pressing interest in Mr. Horowitz’s activities. He is, after all, the brains behind the mischievously-named-and-crafted Academic Bill of Rights – a document which co-opts post-modern ideas on the situated nature of truth and … Read the rest
Column A and Column B
Jan 21st, 2005 8:59 pm | By Ophelia BensonThere was an interview with Amrit and Rabindra Singh on Front Row last night. Mark Lawson asked them (about six minutes in) what they think about the controversy about ‘Behzti,’ especially as Sikhs themselves. Of course, as artists, they think freedom of expression is important and that artists should express what they think is valid, but – there have to be boundaries somewhere along the line. It’s like the idea of a so-called free society: that doesn’t mean you can walk down the street and punch your neighbour in the face. There have to be some regulations and rules that take other people’s feelings into account; artists should not seek knowingly to offend people’s feelings, or to offend the feelings … Read the rest
‘Sponge Bob is Poofter’ Shock!
Jan 21st, 2005 | Filed by Ophelia BensonChristian group gets knickers in twist over tolerance pledge.… Read the rest
Bible Gives Conflicting Advice on Whipping Children
Jan 21st, 2005 | Filed by Ophelia BensonIs it God’s idea of discipline or approved child abuse?… Read the rest
Harvard President on Women in Science and Maths
Jan 21st, 2005 | Filed by Ophelia BensonAre there innate cognitive differences, is there evidence, is it ‘offensive’ to discuss?… Read the rest
Graham Larkin Replies to David Horowitz
Jan 21st, 2005 | Filed by Ophelia BensonIs the Academic Bill of Rights about ‘balance’ or not?… Read the rest
PEN
Jan 20th, 2005 8:30 pm | By Ophelia BensonPEN’s Open Letter is quite interesting, I think.
… Read the restAlthough we applaud the government’s wish to make everyone in our multi-cultural, multi-faith nation feel that they have an equal stake in Britain, the proposed amendment to the bill is misguided. It is emphatically not the way forward. It creates a climate which engenders events such as the recent Sikh riot in Birmingham. Here a violent mob, on the grounds that a play offended their religion, successfully prevented its performance, acted as censors, and threatened the life of its author. Fiona MacTaggart, the Home Office Minister, has contended that the remit of the proposed legislation is narrow. However, the signal the offence clause sends out to religious leaders is broad. It serves
Hadi Saleh 1949-2005
Jan 20th, 2005 | Filed by Ophelia BensonIraqi trade unionist fought for workers’ rights, opposed rule of Saddam Hussein and recent war. … Read the rest
PEN: The OFFENCE Campaign
Jan 20th, 2005 | Filed by Ophelia BensonAgainst legislation that could make it illegal to express provocative views on religion.… Read the rest
Home Office to Meet Writers to Discuss Worries
Jan 20th, 2005 | Filed by Ophelia BensonThat the proposed new law on inciting religious hatred will stifle artistic liberty.… Read the rest
Writers Against Incitement to Religious Hatred Law
Jan 20th, 2005 | Filed by Ophelia Benson‘if religious leaders had their way, we would have little literature, less art and no humour.’… Read the rest
Rappers Face Court for Threats
Jan 20th, 2005 | Filed by Ophelia BensonDen Haag Connection sang about wanting to break Hirsi Ali’s neck.… Read the rest
The Independent on Hirsi Ali
Jan 20th, 2005 | Filed by Ophelia Benson‘We are talking about an international phenomenon here, not just a local incident.’… Read the rest
Index on Censorship on Hirsi Ali
Jan 20th, 2005 | Filed by Ophelia BensonWith useful links.… Read the rest
Scott McLemee on Susan Sontag
Jan 20th, 2005 | Filed by Ophelia BensonRecording the experience of a mind trying to map its own labyrinths.… Read the rest
Dutch MP Ayaan Hirsi Ali Returns to Public Life
Jan 20th, 2005 | Filed by Ophelia BensonVows to continue as MP and in fight against oppression of women.… Read the rest
Bad Legacy
Jan 20th, 2005 3:41 am | By Ophelia BensonA reader sent me the link to this interesting item in the Guardian. The subhead starts things right off – ‘Colonial attitudes linger, finding their most xenophobic expression among liberal defenders of free speech.’ Uh oh.
The argument is basically a ‘taboo’ argument. Every culture has some sacred things, which should be beyond criticism, and certainly beyond mockery. In the UK, it’s the Queen that’s sacred; all cultures have ’em.
Neither is rationalism alien to eastern cultures. Science and mathematics thrived both in the great age of Hindu civilisation and Islamic ascendancy. Eastern cultures have long traditions of theatre, reform movements and of absorbing criticism. But when a creative work offends the sacred, it loses its message.
Well, that’s … Read the rest