All entries by this author

History in the Service of an Ideology *

Jan 30th, 2005 | Filed by

We take from the past what suits us; too often it’s a blinkered, nationalistic view … Read the rest



Teach Children to Call Each Other Poofs? Maybe Not *

Jan 30th, 2005 | Filed by

Nick Cohen: how not to conform to Daily Mail stereotypes of PC prigs.… Read the rest



Iraqi Trade Unionist Attacked and Kidnaped *

Jan 29th, 2005 | Filed by

Iraqi Federation of Trade Unions yesterday denounced attack on one of its elected officials.… Read the rest



Tsunami as Missionary Opportunity *

Jan 29th, 2005 | Filed by

‘What an incredible opportunity God is giving us to provide Bibles for the Bhojpuri for the very first time!’… Read the rest



Proud Atheist Mother of Atheist Daughter *

Jan 29th, 2005 | Filed by

She’d rather do things herself than have someone do them for her.… Read the rest



Academic vs. Horowitzian Truth Standards

Jan 29th, 2005 | By Graham Larkin

28 January 2005

Dear Mr. Horowitz,

Thank you for
your response
to my recent
investigation
of your interest in promoting left-right balance.
In it, you urge me to comment more on the specific contents of the
Academic
Bill of Rights
, rather than on your statements in defense of
the Bill. While I’m more than happy to share my thoughts on the
Bill’s contents, it is not easy, in the context of our exchange,
to separate this material from your own arguments. Indeed, I think
it would be very enlightening to show how your own way of thinking
epitomizes many of the things that most trouble me about the Bill.
A consideration of competing concepts of truth (or, as some … Read the rest



The Clash

Jan 28th, 2005 8:18 pm | By

This articles intersects with a couple of issues we’ve been talking about lately. (Well, I say ‘we’ – I’ve been talking about them. I know that. It’s just me, going jaw, jaw, jaw. I realize that. But I think of it as a discussion anyway – I think ‘we’re’ talking about them. Because…because of a lot of things. Comments, and emails I get, and that tiny little high-pitched voice that no one else hears, and – what meds? I’m fine, cut it out, get your hands off me – )

Sorry. Where was I. A couple of issues. The one about various tensions between cherished goals and ideas, and the one about special treatment of religion.

In the bitter controversy

Read the rest


Buster the Bunny Visits Perverts in Vermont! *

Jan 28th, 2005 | Filed by

Lesbians, maple syrup, PBS – it’s all too much for US Education Secretary.… Read the rest



Simon Schama on Letters of Isaiah Berlin *

Jan 28th, 2005 | Filed by

‘The strenuous journey of an exceptional mind toward its own self-realization.’… Read the rest



Education Secretary and Opus Dei *

Jan 28th, 2005 | Filed by

Particularly unquestioning form of religion seems at odds with background in rational inquiry.… Read the rest



‘Sincerely Held Religious Beliefs’ *

Jan 28th, 2005 | Filed by

Colleges forced to choose between freedom of religion and equal protection under law.… Read the rest



Circumstances

Jan 27th, 2005 6:34 pm | By

I said I was going to drone some more about ethical commitments. Why? Because the subject interests me, especially now, when there is so much pressure to take religion seriously, to be sympathetic towards religion, to give religion the benefit of the doubt, to be careful not to dismiss religion ‘lightly’ or ‘contemptuously’ or quickly or any other way that doesn’t involve the aforementioned taking it seriously. I don’t say there is no merit to those suggestions and urgings, but I do think they are too much in fashion right now, and the other view is too much out of fashion. So I think it’s useful to take a look at the underpinnings of the idea. I take the thought … Read the rest



Katha Pollitt Asks: Jesus to the Rescue? *

Jan 27th, 2005 | Filed by

‘God’s politics tend to be the politics of the people who claim to speak for him.’… Read the rest



Antony Flew’s Flawed Science *

Jan 27th, 2005 | Filed by

Gerald Schroeder on the physics of Genesis – it’s a joke, right?… Read the rest



Hitchens on Jihad in the Netherlands *

Jan 27th, 2005 | Filed by

Victims not just secular artists but people of Muslim origin who do not accept homicidal fundamentalism.… Read the rest



Teachers and Their Pesky Personal Preferences *

Jan 27th, 2005 | Filed by

‘She had an attitude like because she has a PhD we were wrong and don’t know as much as her.’… Read the rest



Wedging Creationism into the Academy *

Jan 27th, 2005 | Filed by

Barbara Forrest and Glenn Branch on a case study of the quest for academic legitimacy. … Read the rest



Lather Up, Joe

Jan 26th, 2005 10:44 pm | By

I’ve been thinking some more about this idea of ethical commitments as the best argument for treating religion differently from other systems of thought. I didn’t make clear enough in yesterday’s post that both Amy Gutman and Jonathan Derbyshire think that argument fails, despite being the best one available. I’m not taking issue with Jonathan, I’m just trying to poke at the idea to see where it gives. One place it gives, as Jonathan mentioned, is the fact that religion is not the only source of ethical commitments. But I think there are other places.

For one thing – ‘ethical commitments’ sounds like an individual item. It sounds like something that goes with the self, and matters to the self. … Read the rest



Religion Must Remain Open to Criticism *

Jan 26th, 2005 | Filed by

The law will serve to create martyrs – laws which criminalise free speech always do. … Read the rest



New Laws Will Keep Freedom to Insult Religion *

Jan 26th, 2005 | Filed by

Director of Public Prosecutions warns against inflated expectations of what law will do.… Read the rest