All entries by this author

Famine Threatens Niger *

Jul 21st, 2005 | Filed by

Bad harvest, locust infestation, slow response.… Read the rest



Eve Garrard: ‘Not Just, and Not Tidy Either’ *

Jul 21st, 2005 | Filed by

There’s no guarantee that good things will receive a welcome in the world.… Read the rest



Disaffected Young Men *

Jul 21st, 2005 | Filed by

‘The evil programs on TV, the music, the literature, the magazines are all responsible.’… Read the rest



The Booklet Advocates Killing ‘Refusers’ *

Jul 21st, 2005 | Filed by

‘The booklet could not have been published without the ministry’s knowledge and approval.’… Read the rest



Norman Geras on Apologists *

Jul 21st, 2005 | Filed by

Note the selectivity in the way root-causes arguments function. … Read the rest



Odds

Jul 20th, 2005 11:32 pm | By

Wait – what?

It is 97 per cent certain that God raised Jesus Christ from the dead – based on sheer logic and mathematics, not faith – according to Oxford professor Richard Swinburne…This conclusion was reached after a complex series of calculations. In simplified terms, it began with a single proposition: the probability was one in two that God exists. Next, if God exists, the probability was one in two that he became incarnate.

A single proposition – that the probability is one in two that God exists. Um.

We talked (or wrangled) about this last year, when this article on a similar but not identical theme appeared.

A scientist has calculated that there is a 67% chance that God

Read the rest


Acorns

Jul 20th, 2005 8:42 pm | By

The trouble with the ‘rage, injustice, grievance, violence inflicted on Muslims, marginalization’ approach is that it takes the action being explained too seriously, too politically, too as-if-rational-y, too as-if-adult-ly, and above all, as an instrument, a tool, a means, rather than as an end in itself, which is what it is. It is not a case of: bang: redress our grievances lest we do it again; it’s a case of: bang: hooray, ha ha, nyah nyah, take that, suffer, die, hooray. Period. The killing is the goal. 7/7 is not October 1917 or the Easter Rising, it’s Auschwitz and Rwanda and Srebrenica.

Along with a huge element of childish fun and games. It’s important not to overlook that. It’s necessary … Read the rest



97% Odds That God Raised JC From Dead *

Jul 20th, 2005 | Filed by

Richard Swinburne: probability that God exists 1 in 2, ditto that he ‘became incarnate.’… Read the rest



Economist I G Patel 1924-2005 *

Jul 20th, 2005 | Filed by

Thatcher asked him: ‘How is it that LSE always has foreigners at its head?’… Read the rest



What are Religious ‘Rights’? *

Jul 20th, 2005 | Filed by

Is religion private, voluntary, individual, textual, believed, or public, coercive, communal, oral, enacted?… Read the rest



Straussians, Shachtmanites, and Bush *

Jul 20th, 2005 | Filed by

Convergence of two philosophical brotherhoods owes little to widely disparate philosophies.… Read the rest



More Like a Restaurant Than a Library *

Jul 20th, 2005 | Filed by

Maybe the absence of books confirms disposition to think them irrelevant.… Read the rest



Getting Pesky Old Books Out of Libraries *

Jul 20th, 2005 | Filed by

Libraries now ‘active, buzzing, lively’ – just like any other coffee shop.… Read the rest



Narcissus Leaves the Pool

Jul 20th, 2005 2:56 am | By

I wrote that comment before I read David Aaronovitch’s piece which says some of the same things.

Mass murder, however, with your own slaughter centre stage, is a pretty extreme act. It is an act of such narcissistic destructiveness, displaying such an incapacity to empathise (you have to be there in the carriage with the Polish girls), that you’d imagine some warning signs, if only you could recognise them…It was also, in a psychological sense, a perverted act. The boys will have known (don’t the relatives remind us?) something of the wrongness of what they did, just as the Columbine school killers did. For whatever reason, however, the pleasure of contemplating the act was greater than the knowledge of its

Read the rest


Not Prince Hamlet, Nor Meant to Be

Jul 19th, 2005 7:32 pm | By

All right, why did they do it? That’s the question people keep asking or rather answering. They did it because of rage, because of a sense of grievance, because of injustice, because all those people marched and no one listened, because of Fallujah, because of Afghanistan (but not because of Bosnia or Kosovo), because of exclusion and marginalization, because of the violence perpetrated on Muslims. But hey – maybe they didn’t. Maybe even apart from the fact that those are all contemptible ‘reasons’ – maybe they’re not reasons anyway. Maybe they’re only pseudo-reasons, like the ‘reasons’ people protest the G8 summit or the ‘reasons’ people toss a brick through Starbucks’ window and then run away. Maybe all that is bullshit … Read the rest



Multiculturalism is at a Moment of Truth *

Jul 19th, 2005 | Filed by

Drift from melting-pot altruism into salad-bowl separatism has morphed into something more sinister.… Read the rest



Aaronovitch on the Narcissism Factor *

Jul 19th, 2005 | Filed by

Anything that conflicts with the Grievance discounted, anything that contributes to it emphasised.… Read the rest



High School Students Want More Challenge *

Jul 19th, 2005 | Filed by

Almost two-thirds say they would work harder if courses were more demanding or interesting.… Read the rest



Lawrence Tribe on Judicial Review *

Jul 19th, 2005 | Filed by

Let the people decide? Dangerous sport.… Read the rest



Mark Tushnet Replies to Waldron and Tribe *

Jul 19th, 2005 | Filed by

Democracy, rights, interests; legislators, judges; how to reconcile.… Read the rest