Originally a comment by Nullius in Verba on Signing a truce with starvation and disease.
I’d like to try highlighting one small reason our political discourse so often feels frustratingly fruitless.
Our dominant political factions represent opposed paradigms of government, and the arguments one side finds compelling simply cannot and will not move the other. In order to make an argument that is compelling to the other side of a conversation, one must understand what matters to them. Unfortunately, we tend to simply repeat ad nauseam arguments that address questions that matter to us, rather than consider the questions motivating our interlocutors. This is a kind of fallacy of irrelevance—one that’s often hard to see, because the premises are … Read the rest