All entries by this author

The Uses of Ann Coulter *

Jun 23rd, 2006 | Filed by

She provides a substitute for racist trash-talk.… Read the rest



Taliban Continues Attacks on Female Half *

Jun 23rd, 2006 | Filed by

Taliban attacks and threats have disrupted or shut down more than 300 schools that teach girls.… Read the rest



Idle Chat

Jun 23rd, 2006 1:58 am | By

Let’s talk. Then again, let’s not. Because with certain kinds of talkers, there’s no point. The kind who systematically talk nonsense, and stipulate ahead of time that nonsense is what they will be talking, remove the point and replace it with – ‘play.’

What’s critical to recognize, from a humanist viewpoint, is that [the laws of thought] comprise more than a particular methodological option, for they are invoked whenever a predicate is attached to a subject; the consequences of their rejection, in humanist terms, would be absolute cognitive silence–since the decision to reject the laws could not itself sensibly be uttered except by invoking them.

This is what I was noticing about Violet a couple of weeks ago – … Read the rest



Scott McLemee at University Presses Conference *

Jun 22nd, 2006 | Filed by

Books will stay around at least for awhile.… Read the rest



Peter Singer on Freedom of Speech *

Jun 22nd, 2006 | Filed by

Covers both ridicule of religion and Holocaust denial.… Read the rest



Juan Cole and Yale *

Jun 22nd, 2006 | Filed by

Scholarship and politics got thoroughly entangled.… Read the rest



Paul Kurtz on Skepticism about Religious Claims *

Jun 22nd, 2006 | Filed by

Skeptical inquirer finds inconclusive evidence, thus insufficient reason to believe, that God exists.… Read the rest



Can Humanists Talk to Postmodernists? *

Jun 22nd, 2006 | Filed by

No. It’s this ‘new metaphysics’ thing, you see.… Read the rest



Naturalism and its Discontents

Jun 22nd, 2006 | By Daniel Koffler

What is the difference between science and pseudo-science? The criterion by which our current practices distinguish the two is falsifiability, but what is inherently valuable about falsifiable hypotheses? Presumably, the goal of science is the discovery of truth. If an unfalsifiable method predicted data more reliably than a falsifiable one, shouldn’t we adopt the unfalsifiable method? Leon Wieseltier, literary editor of The New Republic, is untroubled by this puzzle or myriad similar puzzles. Or perhaps he has solved them all. That would at least justify the oracular certainty with which he proclaims, in the first sentence of his choleric review of philosopher Daniel Dennett’s new book Breaking the Spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon (“The God Genome,” NYT, 2/19/06), … Read the rest



Valor Words

Jun 21st, 2006 5:18 pm | By

So here’s Matt Yglesias noting another valor-word issue. This time the word is ‘principle’. I’m good because I have principles. Well that’s nice, but what kind of principles? What principles? Which ones? Be specific. Give details. Include time place and brand.

Indeed, most Lieberman supporters seem to have abandoned making the case for their man on the merits. Instead, the keyword is principle. A DLC press release called Lieberman “a man of utmost integrity who speaks and governs by his values and principles.”

And there’s another one – integrity. Integrity, again, is only as good as it is. Lots of people can have integrity. The integrity of an axe-murderer isn’t all that desirable. The integrity of a selfish conceited bullying … Read the rest



Principles are Good Only if They are Good *

Jun 21st, 2006 | Filed by

Just saying you have some isn’t good enough.… Read the rest



What’s Up With Democrats Against Estate Tax? *

Jun 21st, 2006 | Filed by

Not a lot of clear thinking, anyway.… Read the rest



Ann Coulter is not a ‘National Treasure’ [link fixed] *

Jun 21st, 2006 | Filed by

Spinsanity has documented many distortions in Coulter’s earlier books.… Read the rest



On Ronald Aronson on Sartre and Camus *

Jun 21st, 2006 | Filed by

A provocative account of the contribution they made to modern literature and philosophy.… Read the rest



Review of Anthony Appiah’s Cosmopolitanism *

Jun 21st, 2006 | Filed by

Conversation is one way of habituating people to appreciate differences in others.… Read the rest



Update on Reza Moradi *

Jun 21st, 2006 | Filed by

Keith Porteous Wood of the NSS found him a pro bono lawyer; they await the summons.… Read the rest



Bloom on Goldstein on Spinoza *

Jun 21st, 2006 | Filed by

As in Epicurus and Lucretius, Spinoza’s God is scarcely distinguishable from Nature, and indifferent to us.… Read the rest



Nonsense from National Review (No, really?!) *

Jun 21st, 2006 | Filed by

Naughty Richard Dawkins hurts people’s feelings by telling the truth. How howwid.… Read the rest



That Special Glow

Jun 20th, 2006 2:11 am | By

I need a word to describe a category of word that (when used for rhetorical purposes) presumes to declare its own value in advance of judgment. Pre-emptive, or pseudo-hurrah, are the two I’ve come up with.

The one I have in mind at the moment is ‘family’. This is by no means the first time I’ve had hard thoughts about that word (there was the 2000 presidential campaign, for instance, when the Democrats completely dropped the word ‘people’ from their vocabularies in favour of ‘families’, so that working people became working families, as if they were all hired and paid in a bunch instead of one at a time), but they’re always being refreshed; at the moment it’s Faisal Bodi’s Read the rest



Gurinder Osan on Erroneous ‘Merit’ Argument *

Jun 19th, 2006 | Filed by

Response to quotas for backward castes in education reveals unattractive features of Indian society.… Read the rest