All entries by this author

Occultism *

Jun 29th, 2006 | Filed by

It’s everywhere. Or is it.… Read the rest



Man Sentenced for ‘Honour Killing’ in Denmark *

Jun 29th, 2006 | Filed by

Ghazala Khan was murdered because the family opposed her choice of husband. … Read the rest



US Supreme Court: Military Tribunals Illegal *

Jun 29th, 2006 | Filed by

Court rules that trying terrorism suspects by military tribunal violates Geneva Conventions.… Read the rest



Lot of Issues Here *

Jun 28th, 2006 | Filed by

‘I’m gay, so I get Diversity, so hire me, but it’s a secret.’… Read the rest



Fundy Xians are Loony in Different Ways *

Jun 28th, 2006 | Filed by

So they’re not all that alarming? Hmm.… Read the rest



Kira Cochrane Interviews Ariel Levy *

Jun 28th, 2006 | Filed by

How does one distinguish the new feminism from the old objectification?… Read the rest



We May Lose Hormones, But We Gain Empathy *

Jun 28th, 2006 | Filed by

Development never stops, which is one of the things that make it interesting to be a being.… Read the rest



Richard Swinburne Talks Revolting Nonsense *

Jun 28th, 2006 | Filed by

Suffering is good for us, God answers prayers if we ask for the right reasons.… Read the rest



Darwin Writes to Asa Gray

Jun 28th, 2006 1:23 am | By

Darwin wrote to Asa Gray in 1860: “With respect to the theological view of the question; this is always painful to me.–I am bewildered.–I had no intention to write atheistically. But I own that I cannot see, as plainly as others do, & as I shd wish to do, evidence of design & beneficence on all sides of us. There seems to me too much misery in the world. I cannot persuade myself that a beneficent & omnipotent God would have designedly created the Ichneumonidae with the express intention of their feeding within the living bodies of caterpillars, or that a cat should play with mice. Not believing this, I see no necessity in the belief that the eye was … Read the rest



Rights and Freedom

Jun 27th, 2006 11:47 pm | By

Janet Radcliffe Richards has an excellent chapter on moral relativism in Human Nature After Darwin, including this on pages 198-9:

Any set of moral standards must include, as part of those standards, criteria for the appropriate treatment of other people…This means there are necessarily conflicts, when some people think they should do what other people think they should not be allowed to do. And, indeed, the essence of what it is for people to have different moral principles is disagreement: if there were no disagreement, there would be no difference. And since there is disagreement, it follows that not everyone can be given the freedom to follow their own principles.

This is what I was talking about the other Read the rest



Handy Tool to Block Regulation *

Jun 27th, 2006 | Filed by

Data Quality Act was written not by a member of Congress but by a lobbyist. Surprise, surprise.… Read the rest



Beware the Dreaded Bloggofascist *

Jun 27th, 2006 | Filed by

‘Butterflies don’t live here, in the blogosphere.’ Speak for yourself, bub.… Read the rest



Ayaan Hirsi Ali Retains Dutch Citizenship *

Jun 27th, 2006 | Filed by

Rita Verdonk found a loophole.… Read the rest



Political Assessments Bypass Reason *

Jun 27th, 2006 | Filed by

A network of emotion circuits lights up.… Read the rest



Girls’ Schools as Tragedy of the Commons *

Jun 27th, 2006 | Filed by

Parents want girls in girls’ schools and boys in mixed schools. Er…… Read the rest



A C Grayling on the Human Rights Act *

Jun 27th, 2006 | Filed by

Institutionalising rights guarantees inconveniences for politicians; and that is as it should be. … Read the rest



What Euthyphro Said

Jun 27th, 2006 12:24 am | By

Simon Blackburn, not surprisingly, talks about this matter of metaethics in his short introduction to ethics Being Good. He starts right off with the question of god as the backer or guarantor or prop for ethics.

For many people, ethics is not only tied up with religion, but is completely settled by it. Such people do not need to think too much about ethics, because there is an authoritative code of instructions, a handbook of how to live.

But the trouble with that, of course, is that the code is only as good as it is. If the code in question is a bad code, then this business of not thinking too much is not good.

Blackburn goes on … Read the rest



Review of David Brion Davis on Abolition *

Jun 26th, 2006 | Filed by

A masterly overview of what scholars in the field have achieved over the past fifty years.… Read the rest



Paul Gross on Scientists on Intelligent Design *

Jun 26th, 2006 | Filed by

War between science and fundamentalist IDM is troubling for science education and science itself.… Read the rest



Norm Geras on Crimes Against Humanity *

Jun 26th, 2006 | Filed by

A talk given at the conference on the Politics of Mass Murder at Kingston University.… Read the rest