Originally a comment by Your Name’s not Bruce? on Beneath contempt.
After four years of criticism, online fury, abuse, threats of violence, and even book burnings, her faith in her own position is undimmed.
Rowling’s position is that sex is real and that the rights of women and girls are worthy of, and in need of respect and defence. Is there now some reason that she should abandon this position? Is she wrong to believe these things? If so, why and how is that the case? If anything, her experience of these last few years (her “lived experience” I daresay), would only reinforce, rather than weaken her beliefs, and rightly so. O’Connell is dismayed that Rowling has not caved … Read the rest