All entries by this author

Life in Kabul, again

Mar 2nd, 2009 11:51 am | By

Paween Mushtakhel loved acting, and was very successful at it; now she wishes she had never discovered the stage.

In December her husband was murdered by unknown gunmen outside their home after defying months of telephone warnings to stop his wife appearing on television. “I killed my husband with my acting,” [she] says…She has spent the past three months in hiding, fearful for her life and those of her two young children. Her only option, she says, is to flee the country. She is not alone. There is an unease bordering on dread among many working women as the restrictions of the Taleban era begin to encroach again on the relative liberalism of Afghanistan’s cities. “The atmosphere has changed,”

Read the rest


Once you eat the cake, it’s gone

Mar 2nd, 2009 10:25 am | By

Well which is it? Cherie Blair seems to want to have it both ways, or all ways. She says Christians are ‘marginalized in society.’

‘Everywhere you look today churches are being closed, Christians are often being marginalised and faith is something few people like to discuss openly.’…She added: ‘People used to suggest that Tony and George would actually pray together and that never happened of course.’

But why ‘of course’? If it’s worrying or upsetting or unfair that ‘Christians are often being marginalised’ then why is it ‘of course’ that Tony and George would not actually pray together?

The problem here is that there are very good reasons for citizens to be alarmed if their heads of state are … Read the rest



800 words, nothing too harsh

Mar 1st, 2009 12:53 pm | By

Nicholas Beale notes on his blog, ‘Quite a favourable review in the FT by Julian Baggini.’ The funny thing about that is that Julian said in his Talking Philosophy post that the FT rejected his first two drafts partly because they were ‘not sufficiently even-handed’ – which, when you compare the review to the TP post, clearly means not favourable enough. Yes it’s quite a favourable review in the FT, because the FT demanded a quite favourable review.

That’s funny in light of Beale’s post but it’s annoying in light of reality and justice. It’s annoying that media outlets commission reviews and then tell the reviewer what to say. It’s annoying that this book by Polkinghorne and Beale got … Read the rest



Philosophers Hate an Untenable Dualism *

Mar 1st, 2009 | Filed by

Is there a principled difference between memories and notebook entries?… Read the rest



Julian Barnes on Eric Blair *

Mar 1st, 2009 | Filed by

The national Orwell is that of plain writing and moral clarity, but things are never so simple.… Read the rest



Japan Tobacco Offers Perks to Researchers *

Mar 1st, 2009 | Filed by

Fun evening for parliamentary aides as legislation to ban the display of cigarettes is before MPs.… Read the rest



Ben Goldacre on Datamining for Terrorists *

Mar 1st, 2009 | Filed by

Even with the most brilliantly accurate test imaginable, your risk of false positives increases to unworkably high levels.… Read the rest



Bobby Jindal the Exorcist *

Mar 1st, 2009 | Filed by

Hey, he’s governor of Louisiana, a state full of charismatic Christians and religious hysterics.… Read the rest



A little warning

Mar 1st, 2009 11:49 am | By

Jeremy is going to move B&W to a different server this week (now you know why we needed the extra cache, just to make triply sure), so B&W may disappear for a day or two. Now you know this so you won’t turn pale and faint if it happens.… Read the rest



A little note from God

Feb 28th, 2009 5:59 pm | By

I jumped into the argument with Nicholas Beale, and – like several other people there, ended up surprised and a little shocked at his evasiveness, or shiftiness as Eric called it. NB said on Thursday about the putative Loving Ultimate Creator:

If a LUC exists then (s)he is unlikely to be incompetent and will therefore have some communication with the people (s)he loves. So if (s)he exists it’s reasonable to suspect that at least one of the major religions has a substantial core of truth.

I pointed out that the LUC hadn’t communicated with me, for one. He replied:

of course God communicates with you. But he doesn’t force you to listen or respond. That is freedom – and

Read the rest


Recruiting for Jesus Camp *

Feb 28th, 2009 | Filed by

Church sends ‘youth leaders’ into schools to flatter children into attending meetings.… Read the rest



David Colquhoun on the Opposite of Science *

Feb 28th, 2009 | Filed by

As soon as you apply science to homeopathy or naturopathy, the whole subject vanishes in a puff of smoke.… Read the rest



Williamson ‘Apologizes’ But Not Really *

Feb 28th, 2009 | Filed by

‘The one thing he doesn’t say, and the main thing, is that the Holocaust occurred, that it is not a lie.’… Read the rest



Amartya Sen on the UDHR *

Feb 28th, 2009 | Filed by

The UD took the firm view that human rights do not depend on legislation for recognition. … Read the rest



US Joins Canada in Boycotting Durban II *

Feb 28th, 2009 | Filed by

Proposed drafts include assaults on free speech under the guise of defending religions from ‘defamation.’… Read the rest



Obama Admin Says No to Durban II *

Feb 28th, 2009 | Filed by

The document being negotiated has gone from bad to worse, and the current text is not salvageable.… Read the rest



The priority of morality to law

Feb 28th, 2009 11:42 am | By

Amartya Sen considers the importance of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

[T]he Declaration took the firm view that human rights do not depend on legislation for recognition. People have these rights simply by virtue of being human. The contention here was that the acknowledgment of a human right is best seen not as a putative legal instrument, but as an important ethical demand–a demand that everyone should have certain freedoms irrespective of citizenship, nationality, and location. Such a recognition would lead to fresh legislation rather than await it. The Declaration championed the priority of morality to law.

That’s useful – the idea that the acknowledgment of a human right should be seen as an important ethical demand rather … Read the rest



Jesus and Mo on the Westboro Baptist Church *

Feb 27th, 2009 | Filed by

They’re right, but they’re so tacky.… Read the rest



Our strong intuition

Feb 26th, 2009 12:37 pm | By

What is ‘God’? Nicholas Beale offers one answer:

On the loving bit, philosophically I’m inclined to offer “Loving Ultimate Creator” as a defintion of God. That is clearly fundamental to Christianity and I think broadly consonant with Islam & Judaism. It offers a philosophical explanations for Anthropic Fine-tuning the intelligibility of the universe, the existence of objective morality and beauty, and our strong intuition that love is the most important and fundamental aspect of the universe.

Whose strong intuition that love is the most important and fundamental aspect of the universe? Who is the we in that ‘our’? Beale and Polkinghorne? Theists? Human beings in general?

I don’t know, but I know I have no such intuition. My intuition … Read the rest



Philosophy’s Great Experiment *

Feb 26th, 2009 | Filed by

X-phi wants to kick down the walls of recent philosophy and place experimentation back at its centre. … Read the rest