The mind reels.
This new paper arguing that "precautionary" and "safety first" approaches during pregnancy to prevent developmental conditions in the fetus is "eugenicist" and "inscribe binarized notions of sex" needs to be seen to be believed. It's truly demented.https://t.co/zBviGme9VB pic.twitter.com/oHQOCyZwLM
— Colin Wright (@SwipeWright) July 18, 2023
So…it’s bad to make efforts to have a healthy (or “fit”) baby, because doing so may reflect eugenicist and biomedical moralist underpinnings.
What, I wondered, is biomedical moralism? Is it a label in common use? Not according to Google, which has never heard of it. I’m guessing it’s a label for thinking it’s better to have a healthy baby than a sick or weak or underweight one, and that it’s better … Read the rest