Trump sources WikiLeaks, Russia, Putin, Sputnik
NPR reports that Trump is apparently quoting Russian propaganda in order to slime Clinton some more.
A riff by Donald Trump at a rally in Wilkes-Barre, Pa., on Monday night about Hillary Clinton’s culpability in the deaths of the U.S. ambassador and three other Americans in Benghazi, Libya, is raising questions about where exactly Trump got his information and how.
During his speech, Trump held up a piece of paper. “This just came out a little while ago. I have to tell you this,” Trump said as he read from the page, which he identified as an email from Clinton confidant Sidney Blumenthal.
“The attack was almost certainly preventable,” Trump read. He continued, “Clinton was in charge of the State Department … if the GOP wants to raise that as a talking point against her, it is legitimate.”
Trump said, “In other words he [Blumenthal] is admitting that they could have done something about Benghazi. This just came out, a little while ago.”
Trump folded the page and let it fall to the floor, and his audience booed.
But – surprise surprise – it’s just another Trump lie.
For Newsweek reporter Kurt Eichenwald, the words Trump read sounded familiar. It turns out they were taken from an article he wrote, which Blumenthal had included in an email. So they were not Blumenthal’s words, but Eichenwald’s.
The misconstrued “email” that Trump was reading had appeared in an article on a Russia-funded website called Sputnik, which has since taken it down.
You can see the original in a screen grab from The Washington Post.
Eichenwald asked in Newsweek “Who in the Trump campaign was feeding him falsehoods straight from the Kremlin?”
Roger Ailes? Rudy Giuliani? His hairdresser?
The Blumenthal email containing the Eichenwald story was posted by WikiLeaks, and apparently hacked from Clinton campaign manager John Podesta’s account.
The Obama administration stated last week it is confident that Russia is behind the hacking, which it asserts is “intended to interfere with the U.S. election process.”
It just couldn’t be any more squalid, could it.
I wish I believed that.
Indeed, what we are learning is that “rock bottom” does not exist. It is always possible to sink deeper.
(Not my observation – I forgot where I saw it.)
FWIW, Glenn Greenwald’s take seems a bit more even-keeled.
https://theintercept.com/2016/10/11/in-the-democratic-echo-chamber-inconvenient-truths-are-recast-as-putin-plots/
Er, no. Glenn Greenwald is awful.
Do you mean as a writer, as a journalist, or as a human being? Genuinely interested.