60 victims
The headline: Female molester facing strict release conditions
The story:
A woman convicted of sexually assaulting children will have to reside in a halfway house after completing her sentence due to concerns she is a risk to reoffend.
Jeez, you think, women don’t usually sexually assault children.
According to documents from the Parole Board of Canada dated Sept. 1, Madilyn Harks, who was formerly known as Matthew Ralf Harks, will face a residency condition upon her statutory release.
Oh. So…Madilyn used to be “known as” Matthew.
She will also be required to follow a treatment plan, respect a curfew and follow psychological counselling.
She will be prohibited from having any contact with children under the age of 18 unless supervised by an adult who is aware of her criminal history, and must avoid locations where children may be expected to congregate.
Harks began serving a three-year sentence for sexual assault against a seven-year-old female in April 2007.
She was released in 2010 and began a 10-year long-term supervision order.
At the time of Harks’ offence in 2007, she was on probation following two convictions of sexual assault against two children aged four and five years old.
“You have also admitted to having approximately 60 victims and you estimate having committed 200 offences, with some of those offences being multiple offences against some of your victims,” the parole board stated.
The board noted that in April 2006, Harks was identified in a dangerous offender psychiatric assessment as having an “all encompassing preoccupation with interest in sexually abusing young girls.”
60 victims. 60.
The documents indicate Harks could also be facing charges for three alleged offences that took place recently while she was in custody: assault, unlawful confinement and sexual assault.
Harks is also subject to conditions imposed by the court in March 2014 that prohibit her from attending facilities including daycare centres, school grounds or playgrounds.
She is also banned from using a computer system for the purpose of communicating with a person under the age of 14.
Harks has undergone gender reassignment, and legally changed her name sometime between April 2010 and August 2012.
After that sentence for assaulting a seven-year-old girl.
Fuck this shit.
So, apart from the fact that this …. person is out of prison, despite comitting 200 sexual offences, should he (no, I will not use “she”. I couldn’t care less about the gender feefees of a fucking child rapist) be caught reoffending, will he go to a women’s prison?
Curfew. Because children the age Harks attacks are likely to be out late at night.
Harks will have re-offended within a year.
Don’t people like this usually get murdered in prison?
“Female” molester? Really, Calgary Sun?
Guessing people may already know, but that’s one of a small chain of Canadian tabloids that are kinda the local versions of The Mirror. Crime porn, celebrity porn, we-hate-progressives rants, all at a grade three reading level. Same outfit tried at one point even to start a cable ‘news’ thing a la Faux. Didn’t work out, oh so regrettably.
@AJ Milne
Yet they’re fine with adopting transspeak (eg, referring to a trans woman as “female.”)
This does not surprise me, as in my opinion the currently-popular trans theory spouted by activists is retrogressive as hell. Too bad most “progressives” haven’t noticed.
Oh, I read ‘Female molester’ as applying to his predilection for assaulting very young females. Just as ‘Child molester’ applies to the age of the victim, not the offender.
That doesn’t work, tigger, especially not in combination with the first sentence:
Also, if it were “child molester” in the headline it wouldn’t actually be “child molester” – it would be child-molester.
Also that’s not how newspapers report – they don’t talk about rape of “females.”