15,053 left within four days
So it turns out that if you give people the opportunity to opt out of a religion they were “born” into, they take it.
Norway’s state chuch lost more than 15,000 followers in four days after launching an online registration system allowing people to opt in or out.
The Lutheran Church is the country’s largest, with nearly three-quarters of the population registered as members.
Nearly three-quarters of the population – in highly secular Norway. How could that statistic not be an artifact of churchy overcounting?
But officials revealed that many instead used the new process to do the opposite, with 10,854 people de-enrolling from the church in the 24 hours after the launch of the website on 15 August. A total of 15,053 left within four days.
The leading Bishop of the Norwegian churches, Helga Haugland Byfuglien, said: “We were prepared for a significant number of resignations and have great respect for the individual’s choice.
“These signals we take seriously. Our task will be to pass on the Christian message and to convey the important role the church can have in people’s lives.”
Sure, it can. But “important role” doesn’t necessarily mean “in a good way.” Churches can have important roles in people’s lives by making them miserable or by suppressing all their hopes and ambitions and making them feel like inferior beings. There’s that, and there’s also the fact that other institutions and ways of thinking and being can also have important roles in people’s lives – and usually without the coercive aspects of religious institutions. Secular groups and outlooks have the advantage of not claiming to have an all-powerful supernatural being running the show.
I’m not from Norway but from one of their neighbour countries. The system is probably very similar, so here’s how you get 75 % registered as Lutherans:
Start from a population that has been converted to 100 % Lutheran and the religion being intertwined with the powers of the king. The population is very homogenous and there is very little immigration to introduce new faiths. Then introduce democratic reforms, humanist and social democratic ideals that educate and enrich the whole population.
At the same time keep in mind that the state church is not controlled by a hierarchy external to the country, but it’s priests and bishops are part of the same society which is changing into what is typically nordic today. The changing zeitgeist turns the Norwegian state church into an institution that is not radical or hateful but actually an organisation that is decent and caring.
Also there is probably a strong tradition to celebrate a new baby with family and friends by having a party, which is traditionally a baptism. Quite possibly there is also a law that the newborn is registered into the mother’s (or father’s ) religion unless the parents specifically oppose.
So you get to a point where the largely secular membership of the state church don’t find much reason to leave the church, because the church is a hybrid of municipal services, transitional rite planners, and caring people who read a bible verse on occasion. At this point it’s those who ideologically care about whether or not god exists and leave because they don’t think so. But most people don’t care enough to actively leave or join. And there are those who have a hateful or radical exception to the church norm as the local priest or church youth group leader or whatever and leave in opposition to her/him.
So you get a slowly but steadily declining membership that stands at 75 %. But I’m not a historian of the church so I might have left out some factors.
Yeah, that’s about it. Newborns are registered as members of the church if a parent is a member, and most people just don’t care – or they want a church wedding because it looks romantic. Still, it’s ridiculous considering less than half our population believes in a god. Most of those who do, are nowhere near as religious as the average US Christian – they don’t go to church, pray or make important decisions based on what the bible says/what some religious leader tells them. They just passively believe in a sort of vaguely Christianity flavoured somethingism.
Now I wonder if I’m still counted as a member by the church I was baptised into. I was never confirmed or anything similar.
Now I’ve answered my question. I am not a member because the denomination I was baptised into considers confirmation the requirement for membership. My husband is probably still technically a member, though.
https://www.facebook.com/144310995587370/photos/a.271728576178944.71555.144310995587370/1258354467516345/?type=3&theater
https://www.facebook.com/144310995587370/photos/a.271728576178944.71555.144310995587370/1259510570734068/?type=3&theater