The Catholic PR machine lumbers into action
The Catholic Health Association (what a ridiculous oxymoron) has put out a statement responding to the ACLU/MergerWatch report, written by Sister Carol Keehan, President and CEO.
A recent report from the American Civil Liberties Union and Merger Watch makes claims about how pregnant women are treated in Catholic hospitals. These allegations, some of which have been the subject of since-dismissed lawsuits, are both unsubstantiated and irresponsible. To frighten families with scary, one-sided stories and exaggerated data is grossly disrespectful to the thousands of physicians, midwives and nurses working in Catholic hospitals who are so devoted to their patients and to the care they deliver.
Note that she doesn’t say they’re untrue.
And it’s not in the least disrespectful, because it’s not the doctors and nurses who decide, it’s the bishops and the administrations. I have a lot of disrespect for the bishops. I think the bishops should stay the fuck out of health care, and do more to get child abusing priests away from children.
The Ethical and Religious Directives for Catholic Healthcare Services are guidelines by which Catholic hospitals operate – and they are consistent with the delivery of safe, effective medical care. One of the first directives states: “In accord with its mission, Catholic health care should distinguish itself by service to and advocacy for those people whose social condition puts them at the margins of our society and makes them particularly vulnerable to discrimination: the poor; the uninsured and the underinsured; children and the unborn; single parents; the elderly; those with incurable diseases and chemical dependencies; racial minorities; immigrants and refugees.”
That’s not the issue. The issue is for instance directive 45:
45. Abortion (that is, the directly intended termination of pregnancy before viability or the directly intended destruction of a viable fetus) is never permitted. Every procedure whose sole immediate effect is the termination of pregnancy before viability is an abortion, which, in its moral context, includes the interval between conception and implantation of the embryo. Catholic health care institutions are not to provide abortion services, even based upon the principle of material cooperation.
But the sister doesn’t want to say that.
The ACLU report focuses in large part on cases in which pregnant women experienced premature rupture of membranes, which is one of the most stressful obstetric events. In this situation, parents want and need to know that every option for saving their baby was exhausted. There is nothing in the Ethical and Religious Directives that prevents the provision of quality clinical care for mothers and infants in these and other obstetric emergencies.
That is what we in the secular world call a lie. See directive 45 again.
45. Abortion (that is, the directly intended termination of pregnancy before viability or the directly intended destruction of a viable fetus) is never permitted. Every procedure whose sole immediate effect is the termination of pregnancy before viability is an abortion, which, in its moral context, includes the interval between conception and implantation of the embryo. Catholic health care institutions are not to provide abortion services, even based upon the principle of material cooperation.
Look up Bishop Olmsted St Joseph’s Hospital Phoenix – then tell us again there’s nothing in the ERD that prevents the provision of quality clinical care for mothers – unless she’s not including saving the mother’s life in her understanding of quality clinical care. (But that would be a sly equivocation, and surely the Catholic church is better than that.) (jk)
Catholic hospitals are not only safe for women and their infants but also the choice of so many patients who seek holistic care from a trusted, compassionate provider. Physicians, too, choose Catholic health care—not only for its quality care but also often because of its deep concern for those who are vulnerable.
We are fortunate in this country to have several independent organizations with oversight responsibility for all hospitals. The Joint Commission accredits hospitals across the country and, in each state, a licensing agency does so as well. These organizations have robust standards and ensure compliance with routine inspections. They would not accredit or license a hospital that is unsafe for mothers or infants under any circumstance.
You would think, but sadly, that’s not true either.
The whole statement is carefully evasive about the actual claims in the report, and full of empty declarations meant to mislead. How very very Catholic.
We are very fortunate in this area to have one remaining alternative to the many Catholic hospitals. Most communities in the US are not so fortunate any more.
We also have one remaining alternative – but our hospitals are so spread out (we’re in a rural area) that the only non-Catholic hospital in the area is a very long drive for a lot of people. For us, it’s three minutes away,. so it’s easy to forget what other people face if they try to get the treatment they need.
Why are so many hospitals in the U.S. Catholic run? When Catholic and secular hospitals were merged in the Province of Ontario over 20 years ago, it was stipulated that if the hospital chosen to remain open ( there was a costly overlap between secular and Catholic institutions back then) had traditionally been Catholic, it would loose that status and would be paid compensation. There are still a few Catholic hospitals, but they are self-financing.
John: It’s because the Catholic Church in the U.S. has made a very deliberate effort to be as entrenched as possible in the health care system in this country, specifically with this agenda in mind. Having lost the largest legal battles (though still nibbling ever inward from the fringes), they decided to to push to control the system from the inside.
I can understand the push to control things from the inside, but it’s nonetheless the case that these hospitals are, at least in part, publicly financed and therefore shouldn’t be pushing any religious agenda. How can tax dollars be used to subsidize the propagation of religion? Isn’t that illegal according to the U.S. constitution?
[…] Sister Carol Keehan again, the President and CEO of the Catholic Health Association who put out an evasive (to put it politely) statement on the ACLU / MergerWatch report on the mess of Catholic hospitals. I did a follow-up post about […]