Stepford students
Julie Bindel in the Sunday Times:
I have been “no platformed” on and off by the various factions of the National Union of Students (NUS) since 2009. My crime? In 2004 I wrote a column in a national newspaper about the case of Kimberley Nixon, a male-to-female transsexual who had sued Vancouver Rape Relief, a feminist support service, after it declined to take her on as a counsellor for rape victims. In the article I made facetious comments about Nixon, and immediately came under fire for my alleged “transphobia”.
I have since apologised for the tone of my article. But no matter, the piece from 2004 has followed me around ever since, with a small cabal picketing and disrupting my presentations on rape, trafficking and prostitution, child sexual abuse and domestic violence.
Because that’s what most needs to happen – powerful feminist voices need to be silenced because we perceive them as wrong on one particular issue. We have so many powerful feminist voices that we can afford to silence them that readily and that persistently.
In 2008 I was shortlisted for a journalist of the year award by Stonewall, the gay rights charity. I was harassed by a baying mob of trans people and their supporters on my arrival at the event. In 2009, the NUS lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender committee voted to “no-platform” me, an honour usually reserved for fascists and former dictators. The motion, which listed a number of phobias I am accused of possessing, such as Islamophobia (I believe the full-face veil to be a symbol of oppression) and transphobia, ended with the statement: “Julie Bindle [sic] is vile.”
It’s all or nothing. (It’s yes or no.) If you don’t recite all the correct platitudes in the right order with the approved spellings, you become an enemy of the people and Vile.
I have been physically attacked while on stage talking about sexual violence towards women; and was forced to withdraw from a debate at Manchester University two years ago after death and rape threats. I am called a bigot, a fascist, regularly compared (unfavourably) to Hitler, and am told I am responsible for the deaths of hundreds of trans women.
A few months ago I might have thought that last item was hyperbole, but now I know very well it’s not, because I’ve seen the same claim made about me.
This latest Stepford Student saga can look, to the uninitiated, as if feminists are banning other feminists from debating contentious issues. But increasingly women’s officers in universities have little to do with feminism.
As a result of the witch-hunt against me I have received emails from students, transgender folk and others who feel silenced and disgusted at the McCarthyite tactics being increasingly used in place of rational debate.
Last year I was invited to Essex University to debate with a former pornography producer. This man had given awards to pornographers responsible for some sick material based on men’s rape fantasies. But I was the one picketed and shouted at by a group of students, demanding I be removed from the premises for my “dangerous transphobia”, while the porn producer was left alone.
This arrangement has got to change.
One up for Sunday Times then?
I am just now reading (slowly, because of the painful story) Iraq-Swedish Hanna Gadban’s book Min Jihad about her search for a liberal Islam, and also much about no-platforming from peculiar political bedmates. Don’t know if/when it’s translated into any bigger lingos.
(Btw, I guess the big error with the recent Riveting Rosie pic was No Platforms? ;) )
In spite of some sincere efforts (especially after her support of Jane Fae, which I still see as an admirable move), I can’t find in myself much sympathy for someone who said:
If that’s what a “powerful feminist voice” of Julie Bindel demands and dreams of, then thank you very much, but no, see you later, maybe some other time. Indeed, I can understand very easily why she is not everyone’s darling.
Still, I’m *against* no-platforming her at the universities. (Not so much against piqueting by groups of students. Not really.)
Hmm yes I see a lot of sites linking to that facetious remark by Julie Bindel –
https://www.stormfront.org/forum/t1120328/
http://eaglerising.com/23499/feminist-wants-to-put-all-men-in-internment-camps/
conservativefiringline.com/feminist-researcher-put-all-men-in-some-kind
Every link on the first page of results is to a far-right site.
Maek you think.
Also, Ariel – do you really think she meant that literally? Do you really think she wasn’t being facetious? Really?
If you really do, I don’t see why you would want to read a word I write, given how often I say facetious things.
[…] Yes, anyone does, because people are including that in the list of Reasons Bindel Must Be Shunned From Everything Forever. A commenter here took it seriously. […]
I’m a classic cis/straight old white dude and I think that proposal is hilarious. There is definitely pain and bitterness* in it, but it’s satire worthy of Andy Borowitz. I kinda hope that if someone checks me out like a library book, she might think the overdue fines well worth it.
* perfectly justified IMO
The men in camps comment? Facetious as fuck.
This?
Not facetious. Vicious.
Has she also apologised for the content?
Huh. The source for my first blockquote comes from a now-dropped link provided by Julie Bindel in her Sunday Times piece. It was: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/jan/31/gender.weekend7
As an aside, you do realise that ‘Stepford students’ is a Brendan O’Neill coinage, don’t you? Careful how you go!
I’m glad I don’t live in the USA; I’d be terrible at it. Someone else gets a job I applied for? Look for another one. BZZZT! Wrong answer! Sue! Really, Kimberley Nixon?
I am utterly fed up with the tiny, but disproportionately loud, portion of trans people who are determined to make waves, whilst the rest of us just want to get on with our lives, anonymously and quietly. They refuse to believe it, of course, apparently seeing themselves, positively, as latter-day Crusaders (who also didn’t see that what they were doing was wrong) but they are ruining it for everyone else.
I’m equally pissed-off at feminists who fail to see that what they have said might be legitimately the wrong thing to say.
In both cases it seems to me to be driven by some kind of short-sighted narcissism; “What can I say today that will get me publicity, and fawning comments from my followers?”
There is a legitimate debate to be had on gender, and the patriarchy (which, as we all know, hurts men too), but not at the level of individuals.
Much, much better than ‘no-platforming’ speakers, is wide publicity about the event and plenty of time after they have had their say so that they can be cross-examined, and perhaps persuaded why their views are mistaken. Universities are supposed to be about educating people in how to think more than what to think.
@Pieter B
Agree with you. Bindel’s statements are amusing and should not be taken literally. Perhaps Bindel’s material, like the consumption of alcohol, should come with a minimum age limit.
The 2004 article WAS shockingly trans-phobic, though I would never think of using the term ‘trans-phobic’ in real life myself. The ARTICLE deserved all the disrespect and shock that, say, Tim Hunt earned. But no more than that.
By what means has Trans Purity become as reflexive as Multi-Culti relativism about Islam? Is there some secret cabal that legislates the self-sabotage of supposed ‘progressive’ movements?
tigger @ 10 – ah for once I can defend the honor of my country, or at least say it wasn’t one of us this time – Kimberly Nixon’s lawsuit was a Canadian matter; the women’s shelter was (and is) in Vancouver.
Badland @7, Though some have met this with some suspicion, yes, Julie Bindel has apologized for both tone and content.
https://transactivist.wordpress.com/2011/09/24/julie-bindel-apologises-for-2004-article/
Also, Badland, she apologized for the tone earlier, 2009 is what my memory is saying, don’t trust it. She apologized for tone AND content in 2011.
NoviousNan
From your link:
Thanks for providing that.
I’ve taken to referring to them as FETAs (as they are so fond of the “TERF” designation, let’s give them their own acronym.) Feminist Exclusive Trans Advocates. ‘cuz if you’re gonna tell me with a straight face that”gender critical” is a synonym for TERF and the most dangerously violent personal threat any transwoman faces is a TERF (and not, say, being outted at a frat party) then I am gonna make fun of you.
@ 17 Graculus
I hate to tell ya, but you’re late to the party.
https://twitter.com/auntysarah/status/497771028266090496