You’re upset? Say no more!
The challenges I face in the Religious Studies classroom today are unlike any I have encountered in more than three decades of teaching…it seems that the more religious people become, the less willing they are to engage in critical reflection about their faith. For many years, I have begun my classes by telling my students that if they are not more confused and uncertain at the end of the course than they are at the beginning, I will have failed. But now, as rarely in previous years, a growing number of religiously committed students consider such a challenge a direct assault on their faith…Religious correctness has become the latest version of political correctness. For those who are religiously correct, critical reflection breeds doubt and must, therefore, be resisted.
That is where the problem is, you know. That is what it boils down to – the refusal to reflect critically, and the making a virtue of that refusal. That’s the root of all evil – not religion, but dogmatic protected thought-refusing ‘faith’ of any kind, and yes I do include secular faiths in there.
(Okay, okay, not literally all evil. Don’t be so literal.)
A colleague recently told me that one of his best students reported that she did not like the course she is now taking from me, After God, because “it did not make her feel good.” I responded, “That is, of course, precisely the point.” The chilling effect of these attitudes was brought home to me two years ago when a university administrator at another institution where I was teaching called me into his office and asked me to defend myself against the charge of an anonymous student who claimed that I had attacked his faith because I urged him to consider the possibility that Nietzsche’s analysis of religion called the belief in absolutes into question. I was not given the opportunity to present my side of the story. The administrator assumed I was guilty as charged and insisted that I apologize to the student.
That reminds me of this item from last week.
Andrew McLuskey was sacked from Bayliss Court Secondary School in Slough after a Religious Education lesson discussing the pros and cons of religion. Pupils at the predominantly Muslim school claimed Mr McLuskey said most suicide bombers were Muslim. But he rejected the allegation and said the school was too quick to sack him without giving him right of reply…The school authorities denied they were being heavy-handed and said their first priority was pupils’ welfare. “I don’t think it’s important what I think,” said the school’s deputy head teacher Ray Hinds. “It’s what the pupils think that were in the classroom at the time. And they were very upset.”
Uh oh. Wrong. Ding ding. Go back, start over. Being upset is not the same thing as being upset for good reasons. I can vouch for that from my own personal experience. Don’t get dizzy and fall out of your chair, but I have been known to get upset or cross or bad-tempered for insufficient or bad or downright batty reasons. I have known other people to have the same problem. I’m going to go right out on a limb here and surmise that it’s not uncommon. Upsetness is not invariably a good or safe guide to what actually happened, or the malice of the other party, or to the intentions of anyone involved. Emotional blackmail is great fun, but it’s not what you’d call epistemically sound.
It isn’t just worrying, it is extremely scary.
I knew it was bad, but to get this bad, this quickly is a bad sign.
Probably pointing to “Gilead”
( The Handmaid’s Tale )
well, to be brutally honest, when you have large supernaturalist groups in the USA instructing their kids to challenge any school teachers who dare bring up the origins of the universe/long-timescale geology/dinosaurs & evolution, with the intellectually devastating:
“How do you know? YOU weren’t there. only god knows – HE was there!”
what else could anyone reasonably expect?
This has been a known tactic for some years now, so of course many of these kids are of college age. Some of them even make it into college…!
Bob bless ahmehrickaar..
:-)
This is kind of worrying as I was thinking of RS or philosophy teaching as a possible option if I can’t decide what else to do with my life (I can’t imagine there is a surplus to be honest). I am pretty surprised that what happened there is allowed. Hopefully the only reason was that he was temporary and didn’t have solid employment rights (not that that is good, obviously).
Is that even false thought? I mean, I don’t actually know I’m just asking. But it would seem doubley unwarranted if he was sacked for saying some true-but-naughty.
This is worrying for at least a couple of reasons. First, this is yet more evidence to confirm that there is an increasing eagerness in U.S. colleges to treat students as consumers who are always right. Secondly, if religion cannot be subjected to criticism in an academic environment, there is little hope it can be subjected to criticism in broader society (where “academic freedom” does not extend and, more to the point, where people are not given grades on their comprehension of the issues).
T. Greenan: Unfortunately, as in many academic fields, there is a surplus of PhD trained scholars of philosophy and religious studies, hence a great difficulty finding teaching jobs. I wouldn’t recommend pursuing either field unless you passionately love the field and are willing to suffer for what you love.
Excellent post, light touch, well done. It immediately makes me want to go search out the participants and find out what really happened.
Shows the different rewards for ‘being offended’ when some ‘similar others’ are prepared to murder if they choose to ‘be offended’. If the media world treated Muslims as adults making choices, they might stop rewarding and encouraging this violence and silencing of thought.
Hey, that’s why we have TENURE! Contrary to popular belief this isn’t just some scam for getting us sinacures–we’ve got it so that we can say stuff like this and not get fired.
Fortunately I teach at a Catholic college so I don’t have to worry about towing either a religious fundamentalist line or a secular politically correct line. I’m not being facetious–I mean it. I am proud to teach at a Catholic college and grateful for the academic freedom that that provides for me!
H. E. Baber
Department of Philosophy
University of San Diego
In response to the second ghastly link, I wondder what happens to the kid that’s ever going to boycott RE lessons ?