What Misogyny?
Misogyny? What misogyny?
The lives of young women might be ruined by the Government’s failure to make forced marriages illegal, a senior police officer has warned. Commander Steve Allen of the Metropolitan Police said that a decision by ministers last month to drop proposed legislation had been greeted by some ethnic minorities as a signal that forced marriage was acceptable. His concern about the about-turn, which was partly prompted by fears that the new law would stigmatise Muslims, is shared by a Crown Prosecution Service director and the head of Scotland Yard’s Homicide Prevention Unit. The head of a South Asian women’s charity said yesterday that girls were already suffering the consequences of the decision.
A couple of questions. Why is there more worry about possible stigmatization of Muslims than there is about the wrecked lives of women? And why is there such a worry anyway when the new law was intended to help (among others) Muslims – Muslim girls and women subject to forced marriage?
Although the proposal was welcomed by many victims’ groups, some organisations complained that it would increase racial segregation. The Muslim Council of Britain gave a warning that such a law might become “another way to stigmatise our communities”.
Oh. That’s why. Because the MCB piped up, that’s why. And when the MCB speaks, unfortunately, the gummint listens. Victims’ groups can welcome all they like, but if the MCB squawks about ‘our communities’ – well that’s that. Misogyny? What Misogyny?
Mr Allen, who tackles honour-related violence…, told The Times: “…For me the persuasive argument is about the message we send out. We have already received feedback from community groups suggesting that the decision not to make it a criminal offence means it must be all right.”…Nazir Afzal, the Crown Prosecution Service director for London West, said that a new law would have helped campaigners in minority communities to stamp out forced marriage. “I have heard it said that a new criminal offence would be just another stick to beat the Muslim community with, but my belief is that we should be carrying our own stick,” he said…”I hear dialogue from victims but I don’t hear a great deal from Muslim men.”…Jasvinder Sanghera, of the Nirvana Asian Women’s Project, which helps victims, said: “A new criminal offence would have given the victims the power to say to their family, ‘You can’t do this to me. It’s against the law.’ It’s a chance missed and it’s already doing damage. Political correctness is not an excuse for moral blindness.”
Read the whole article; read it and wonder yet again why the MCB outweighs Jasvinder Sanghera and Nazir Afzal.
“fears that the new law would stigmatise Muslims”
These fears were stated by the likes of the MCB. It seems strange that it would have such a low opinion about Muslims, that it would think Muslims were more likely to engage in this foul practice.
Regular visitors could perhaps predict my response; in my search for the history and passage of this consultation paper I found the following article in the Telegraph from last September when the paper was first put together; it’s worth a look.
“Clerics face jail over forced marriages”
By Sarah Womack, Social Affairs Correspondent
(Filed: 06/09/2005)
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2005/09/06/nmarr06.xml&sSheet=/news/2005/09/06/ixhome.html
OB, don’t now what the copyright situation is. Due to their relevance I have pasted these direct quotes -(in parenthesis) – delete as required I guess…
(“Baroness cotlans stated “Forced marriage cannot be justified on religious or cultural grounds because no major world religion supports it. We recognise that this is a very sensitive issue.”
Criminalisation could dissuade victims from seeking help because they would fear their parents being jailed, the consultation paper said.
It could also drive the practice underground and lead to more parents taking children overseas until they had been forced to marry and have children.
A special Government unit has dealt with more than 1,000 cases of forced marriage since it was set up in 2000 and has rescued about 200 young people taken overseas to wed against their will.
Currently families who compel their children to marry can be charged only with offences such as assault or kidnap.”)
BTW The number of questions for consideration in the consutation doc:
5 in favour of new legislation, and the questions against it numbered 10…
Typo – I meant Baroness Scotland.
Muslims stigmatise themselves, by behaving as though the middle ages never ended.