Sense and Sensitivity
Galloway’s a funny guy. Maybe not as funny as Pat Robertson (‘I didn’t say “assassinate”!’ ‘Okay I’m sorry, I’m rilly sorry, I was just in a mood that day.’) but still pretty funny. Okay not really funny, more like disgusting, but I get so tired of pointing out how disgusting people are. Still – he is.
Mr Galloway, MP for Bethnal Green and Bow, said TV executives had to be “very sensitive about people’s religion” and if broadcasters did not show sufficient sensitivity they “had to deal with the consequences”. He said: “You have to be aware if you do [offend people’s beliefs] you will get blowback. You should do it very carefully, especially if you are a public service broadcaster.”
Thenthitive. They have to be thenthitive – and if they’re not thenthitive enough, then blam! Okay? Got that? Be thenthitive or I’ll kill you.
Rushdie called him on it, as well he might.
“Is that a threat?” asked Rushdie during the debate at the Media Guardian Edinburgh international television festival. Describing Mr Galloway’s argument as “craven”, the author said: “The simple fact is that any system of ideas that decides you have to ringfence it, that you cannot discuss it in fundamental terms, that you can’t say that this bit of it is junk, or that bit is oppressive … we are supposed to respect that?”
It’s craven, it’s stupid, it’s mindless, and it means we can’t discuss things properly. Which is pretty much how things are: there are all sorts of subjects that don’t get discussed properly because there’s way too much senstivity about ‘people’s beliefs’. A lot of people believe that women should be subordinated, locked up, owned, and without rights, and a lot of other people who don’t believe that nevertheless keep silent on the subject out of brain-dead sensitivity to ‘beliefs’. Call it Gallowayism, if you like, or hypertrophy respectis.
Sad about Kashmir.
“I have a deep feeling for Kashmir, and I just had to write this book,” Rushdie said. “[But] it’s very hard to write about real events. It becomes unbearable. The challenge in writing this book was: how do you write about these things bearably without sweetening the pill?” Rushdie said Kashmir had changed since the 1950s and 1960s. “There was no radical Islam in Kashmir then – it was pacifist, Sufist – and it had nothing to do with jihad. But in the last half century this terrible fundamentalism has got hold of the region.”
Like so many regions. Terrible nightmare – and not one to be respectful or sensitive about; one to be resisted and fought.
I really am quite glad Rushdie has a new book out, because he can, frankly, kick butt at any level regarding this sort of ‘craven’ nonsense, and the chattering fuzzy liberals have to give him column-space because he is such a heavyweight writer… .
Hell! I’m all for Rushdie but I got stuck into the same discussion on harry’s place, not about Rushdie or Galloway.No, some cretins there just take every opportunity to sling mud at any muslim and it was Tariq Ramadan’s turn. Again. I sort of only realised that after I remonstrated against clearly unjustified abuse/accusations against the guy. There are some real hater-mongers on that site. Such a pity.
Never saw the word, Blowback or ringfence.
Blowback’s 3rd def in dictionary.com:
3. The effect caused by recirculation into the source country of disinformation previously planted abroad by that country’s intelligence service in an effort to mislead the government of another country
Now that’s a head spinning word. How does blowback fit into media? I mean, I can see an escalation of hate and misunderstanding arising from injudicious press from Aljeezera to guardian and back and forth that fuels hateful diatribe between their loyal readership. But books don’t require the ‘thensitivity’ of the media.
Books can delve into the issues without regard to sensitivity, whereas, media is prone to sloganism or jingoism or manipulation of the masses. Media can appeal to racism. I can relate to both Rushdie and Galloway…though I hate to ‘ringfence’. Example: I don’t trust Fox News to discuss the shortcomings of Islam vs Christianity any more than I trust Fox News’ assessment of Atheism. Maybe Galloway doesn’t want BBC or Guardian to become like Fox.
Too bad about tv’s limited debate.
FenceSitter
‘I can relate to both Rushdie and Galloway’
Explain to me how you do that, and I will ask the Little Sisters of Insanity to light a candle for you.
‘an escalation of hate and misunderstanding arising from injudicious press from Aljeezera to The Guardian’
If the Guardian and Al Jazeera are your idea of hate-mongers, you should get out more.
As for blowback, back in the day it involved a girlfriend and a spliff.
Don, my reconciliation of Galloway and Rushdie concerns only the issue of an unbiased media versus an author’s right of expression. Galloway and Rushdie are not really arguing about the same thing. Not as far as I can tell from the somewhat biased view of the Guardian article provided by BnB.
I liked Galloway when he recently sassed the US Senate. In fact, his performance was a bit of blowback no matter how you define it. Many Americans long for such a powerhouse speaker–especially among the anti-war folks.
The media should report news, not spice it up–just old horsesense. I hear lots of bias on the BBC. Not much hate, yet.
When I say, ‘…I can see an escalation of hate and misunderstanding arising from injudicious press from Aljeezera to guardian and back and forth that fuels hateful diatribe between their loyal readership.’, I should say, ‘I can visualize’ or ‘I can imagine’. I live in the States where the media has recently become a circus on both the local and national levels. The media use to be better in the times of your old girlfriend and the spliff and all the blowback…or was that galloway’s girl?!
I’m sure Galloway isn’t exactly sensitive except perhaps when he is accused of graft by the US politburo.
And so far, I’ve liked the Aljezeera news. Google feeds us their take and the China News. All kinds of good stuff.
Fencesitter –
“Maybe Galloway doesn’t want BBC or Guardian to become like Fox.”
I’m sure he could find similarities if he tried really hard; just as he found noble and admirable features in the character of SLobodan Milosovic, Saddam Hussein
“I can see an escalation of hate and misunderstanding arising from injudicious press from Aljeezera to guardian and back and forth that fuels hateful diatribe between their loyal readership.’,”
Actually, I think you’ll find the radership of the Guardian is substantially left-liberal, and probably a good portion of them find Aljazeera TV a refreshing change from more mainstream or US owned newsgroups.
Don
“I will ask the Little Sisters of Insanity to light a candle for you.”
This ostensibly humerous phrase is offensively and perniciously heightist, sexist, and extremely demeaning to loonies and blind people. Please retract it and make suitable reparations to all the offended groups – via electronic money transfer – to my lawyers, Moody and Snyde
Fencesitter –
“Maybe Galloway doesn’t want BBC or Guardian to become like Fox.”
I’m sure he could find similarities if he tried really hard; just as he found noble and admirable features in the character of SLobodan Milosovic, Saddam Hussein
“I can see an escalation of hate and misunderstanding arising from injudicious press from Aljeezera to guardian and back and forth that fuels hateful diatribe between their loyal readership.’,”
Actually, I think you’ll find the radership of the Guardian is substantially left-liberal, and probably a good portion of them find Aljazeera TV a refreshing change from more mainstream or US owned newsgroups.
Don
“I will ask the Little Sisters of Insanity to light a candle for you.”
This ostensibly humerous phrase is offensively and perniciously heightist, sexist, and extremely demeaning to loonies and blind people. Please retract it and make suitable reparations to all the offended groups – via electronic money transfer – to my lawyers, Moody and Snyde