Just the One
Update. Norm comments on this post which itself is a comment on a post of his which itself was a comment on the death of Paul Foot. So? Nothing. I just like to follow trains of thought. Anyway, he notes that there is only one book in common between our two lists. Yes. But it would have been a bit boring to repeat the same list, wouldn’t it. Although I didn’t actually look at his list again before doing mine, so I didn’t make a systematic effort not to repeat his. But I did remember that he had Mill, and I rejoice to concur with the Normblog reader. I said my list isn’t definitive, isn’t exactly a top ten list or list of favorites – more like a sampling from a much larger list of favorites. (For instance, I love literary biographies and biographies of philosophers; I could give a list of at least 20 or 30 in that genre, all of which are favorites. Maybe I will, sometime.) But Mill is the exception. (Well, and so are Montaigne and Hazlitt.) Mill really is a favorite. I couldn’t leave him off in order to have a non-duplicative list. So I didn’t. And I thought it would be tidy to have one overlap and the rest different.
I think that The Philosopher’s Snack Pack should have been on your list. Now that was some book! :-)
Well I’m sure it would be if I’d read it.
But maybe it should be just on the strength of the title!
As No 11 on your list, I would recommend James Fitzjames Stephen’s “Liberty, Equality, Fraternity” — his answer to Mill’s “On Liberty” and in which he mercilessly exposes what he considers to be Mill’s ‘woolly thinking’ (well, he didn’t actually use the term as such …).
More here.