Ten Books That Shook the World
Now that’s an idea. There are all these lists all the time – Prospect’s list of the top intellectuals, the BBC’s list of Favourite Reads or whatever it was called, Norm’s lists of everyone’s favourite movies, three novels (was it?), rock groups (that last one actually incited my colleague to vote, though he usually thinks he’s too good for such frivolities) (that’s a tease, obviously), and so on. Now Norm has a new list, just his own this time, of
10 great books of my life (sort of). Though I’ve been thinking about the list for some time, I protect myself against assault by saying that these are not necessarily what I judge to be the 10 most important of the works that I’ve read in my life (on whatever criterion, or set of criteria, or scale). But they’re all ones which have had a marked and lasting influence on the way I think about the world.
What a good idea. I want to do that. Let’s do that. I’ll do one, or perhaps I’ll do several (on account of how I’m terrible at making up my mind, I’m mushy and vacillating and unstable and fickle and undiscriminating, I like everything, or not everything but a lot of things), and if you feel like it you can do yours in comments or by email.
And while you’re at it, check out a new blog by Jonathan Derbyshire. He’s a colleague of my colleague’s and his colleague (if you see what I mean) – that is to say, he’s Reviews Editor of TPM. There’s a delightfully eclectic note to the blog, with a post on Jeeves and Wooster cheek by jowl with one on secularism. I love eclecticism (see above about fickleness and mushiness which is actually eclecticism, breadth, wideness of views, love of variety and multiplicity, etc.).
Ophelia, I await your list with bated breath. Please don’t put books I haven’t read yet!
Okie doke, Norm, I’ll be careful not to! (I know I have that list of all the books you haven’t read here somewhere, at the bottom of one of these stacks of bumf…)
I’m thinking of doing the ten most overrated books.
Crime and Punishment – get over it, Rasky!
Tess of somewhere in Wessex – God she was tedious.
To the Lighthouse – yeah, yeah, you wanted to visit a lighthouse.
Mrs Dalloway – yeah, yeah, you’re having a party.
The Illiad – let’s list ships, that’s a good idea!
You get the idea. And to think that I’ve been paid to write fiction reviews… ;-)
cackle!
We could do that. I love over-rated lists (excpept when they include things I think are brilliant, of course, like that guy who thinks Alice is too girly, for Christ’s sake). I’ve drawn up plenty of them myself. Even agree with yours, except for the Iliad. My top candidate is The Great Gatsby – you should hear the yells of rage I get when I say that. It’s blasphemy over here.
The Great Gatsby
Vanity Fair
Trollope
Faulkner
Hemingway
I throw out whole writers…
I’m not sure that Trollope has ever been “rated,” exactly–he seems permanently stuck in the list of also-rans, despite the efforts of many, many people to make him Canonical. But the Palliser novels and The Way We Live Now are fine stuff.
Vanity Fair is overrated?! *crashes to the floor, gasps for breath, dies in agony* :)
The Great Gatsby I’ll grant you, and raise you, oh, Ulysses. (Er, Joyce, not Tennyson.) And “late,” long Henry James (as opposed to early and most short Henry James). And, dare I say it, War and Peace.
Hey!!! Crime and Punishment?! Excuse me? Next it’ll be Jane Eyre is overrated. Hmmmph.
Well, true, Miriam…I suppose I’m disagreeing with the people who try to buck the trend, who claim he’s better than we think. I think he’s worse.
And late Henry James is much the same thing. A lot of people can’t stand late James, so is he really over-rated? Tricky. I’m with you on War and Peace though. Can read Anna Karenenina a million times, and have never been able to persuade myself to read War and Peace more than the first time.
snicker. Welllll…I don’t think Jane Eyre is overrated exactly, but I do think Wuthering Heights puts it in the shade without even breaking a sweat. To put it another way, I think JE is very very good, but WH is in another dimension.
Was it Guedalla who said James’ work could be divided into three reigns: James I, James II and the Old Pretender?