What Problem?
The nonsense continues. So there’s no point in ceasing to talk about it, not yet at least. (And I daresay we can be pretty confident that the nonsense won’t stop, it never does.)
There is this string of absurdities for example.
In a departure from past practice, a Dec. 27 Dean campaign event opened with a prayer from a minister. That same day, Dean told voters, “I think religion is important and spiritual values are very important, which is what this election is really about.” The faith-friendly tone follows a December cover story, “Howard Dean’s Religion Problem,” in The New Republic magazine. The article called Dean “one of the most secular candidates to run for president in modern history.” It quoted Dean, whose wife and children are Jewish, saying he doesn’t go to church “very often” and that “my religion doesn’t inform my public policy.”
Note the elision of religion and ‘spiritual’ values, whatever that means. Note the fact that Dean has a religion ‘problem.’ Note that in this context the word ‘secular’ is apparently an accusation. Note the default position – that Dean has a religion problem, not that Bush has a rationality problem.
In a Gallup Poll conducted Nov. 10-12, Bush held a 67 percent to 30 percent lead among religious voters over the Democratic front-runner, former Vermont Gov. Dean. In hypothetical head-to-head races with both Gephardt and Clark, Bush’s lead was 65 percent to 33 percent. “It seems that in the three years since the (2000) election, Bush has become the go-to candidate for those who feel that religion is important to their vote for president,” wrote Gallup religion and values editor Albert Winseman.
Note the combination not to say conflation of religion and values. Note how that subliminally (for those who don’t happen to notice the oddity) conveys the idea that people who lack the first also lack the second. Note how that subtly tells us that secular people have no values. Note how coercive it all is, without really seeming to be.
And this article in the Independent reminds us (in case we’d forgotten) how absurdly dysfunctional the US election system is. Terrific: all the Democratic candidates except Dean are shredding Dean with more energy than they are Bush, with what happy results for the future one can imagine. Flip a few pages on the calendar and picture all the tv ads quoting Lieberman and company on that turble turble secular fella Dean. Paid for by all those corporations that do pay for US elections, and then write US law in exchange for the favour. What a marvelous arrangement.
I would love to see how a truly honest, secular candidate did in the US. Or the UK, actually, that being my native country. I think (hope) there’s an audience out there for someone who’s willing to dispense with the bullshit that he/she thinks will win the election.
James makes a good point. We shouldn’t forget that Tony Blair makes a lot of his Christian beliefs and now Michael Howard has published his ‘beliefs’ as well. We look to be heading towards a ‘convictions’ election just like the US.
Plus in all the coverage given to the various anti-Government messages from various Bishops and Archbishops over Christmas I didn’t see any which said ‘Why should anyone take this nonsense seriously anyway?’.
People in glass houses…
True, true. But then again – I don’t think you in the UK have quite the equivalent of the New Republic doing a cover story on Dean’s ‘Religion Problem’ – do you? Blair is religious, yes, but not all Labour politicians are – are they? I did a N&C some time ago about Blair wanting to say ‘God bless you’ at the end of a speech on Iraq, and all his inner circle protesting noisily. That’s the difference, it seems to me. Here no one protests noisily.
So your house isn’t really quite glass. Has some largish windows perhaps, but it’s not all glass. Stone-throwing permitted.
Also, Blair just doesn’t make that much of his Christian beliefs. Also, also given that a poll today shows that 67% of the UK population don’t know when the second world war ended, I’d bet that most of the UK population don’t actually realise Blair is a christian.
…and 67% won’t vote perhaps?