He’s outed himself as being misogynistic many times over. There is only one kind of woman that matters to him: male women. And he just uses statements like this to twist the actual loathing that women have of being pawed over by men into something weird and bigoted.
And this goes to my previous comment on normality. The overwhelming majority of humans are attracted to the opposite sex (exclusively or otherwise). It is entirely reasonable and proper to assume that a man is attracted to women and vice versa, and it is likewise reasonable and proper to enact policy based on that assumption. It becomes even more reasonable and proper when it’s recognized that it’s normal for men to have physical advantage over women and normal for men to exploit that advantage.
But no, we must pretend that the normal is not normal. Reverse the naturalistic fallacy. Rather say that a thing is natural and therefore right, say that a thing is right and therefore natural.
Has he had an orchidectomy and, surprisingly, lost his sex drive so that he no longer realises that a man can randomly turn up at an elderly woman’s door to give her a genital inspection and well just gets “carried away”?. (I’d like to say this knowledge of human stupidity and depravity is the result of a long and varied life but, no, that’s just what I’ve learnt in the last 24 hours on Twitter.)
He’s outed himself as being misogynistic many times over. There is only one kind of woman that matters to him: male women. And he just uses statements like this to twist the actual loathing that women have of being pawed over by men into something weird and bigoted.
And he’s so dense. ‘We don’t assume a woman wants to “feel up women”, so why men?’
And this goes to my previous comment on normality. The overwhelming majority of humans are attracted to the opposite sex (exclusively or otherwise). It is entirely reasonable and proper to assume that a man is attracted to women and vice versa, and it is likewise reasonable and proper to enact policy based on that assumption. It becomes even more reasonable and proper when it’s recognized that it’s normal for men to have physical advantage over women and normal for men to exploit that advantage.
But no, we must pretend that the normal is not normal. Reverse the naturalistic fallacy. Rather say that a thing is natural and therefore right, say that a thing is right and therefore natural.
Gobbledegook.
Has he had an orchidectomy and, surprisingly, lost his sex drive so that he no longer realises that a man can randomly turn up at an elderly woman’s door to give her a genital inspection and well just gets “carried away”?. (I’d like to say this knowledge of human stupidity and depravity is the result of a long and varied life but, no, that’s just what I’ve learnt in the last 24 hours on Twitter.)