On people
An article from the CDC: 2,500-year Evolution of the Term Epidemic:
The term epidemic (from the Greek epi [on] plus demos [people]), first used by Homer, took its medical meaning when Hippocrates used it as the title of one of his famous treatises. At that time, epidemic was the name given to a collection of clinical syndromes, such as coughs or diarrheas, occurring and propagating in a given period at a given location. Over centuries, the form and meaning of the term have changed. Successive epidemics of plague in the Middle Ages contributed to the definition of an epidemic as the propagation of a single, well-defined disease. The meaning of the term continued to evolve in the 19th-century era of microbiology. Its most recent semantic evolution dates from the last quarter of the 20th century, and this evolution is likely to continue in the future.
At the start of the 21st century, epidemics of infectious diseases continue to be a threat to humanity. Severe acute respiratory syndrome, avian influenza, and HIV/AIDS have, in recent years, supported the reality of this threat. Civil wars and natural catastrophes are sometimes followed by epidemics. Climate change, tourism, the concentration of populations in refugee camps, the emergence of new human pathogens, and ecologic changes, which often accompany economic development, contribute to the emergence of infectious diseases and epidemics (1). Epidemics, however, have occurred throughout human history and have influenced that history. The term epidemic is ≈2,500 years old, but where does it come from?
H/t Gordon Campbell
The fact that this etymology refers to ‘epidemics of infectious diseases‘ and not just ‘epidemics’ shows that even the writer of the piece knows that the word is used to describe phenomena other than disease, even if that usage isn’t relevant to this particular passage.
Plus, of course, the MP who accused the minister of calling children a disease, when the minister used the word to refer to what was being imposed on them (being referred to gender clinics), has used it in that exact way herself (‘an epidemic of childhood poverty’). If the MP is to be consistent, she should either apologise for her defamatory accusation against the minister, or apologise for calling poor children a disease.