Opportunities for the boys
The relentless obfuscation is getting ridiculous.
Trans inmates can visit women’s prisons to prepare them for outside
The Times doesn’t mean “trans inmates”; it means male inmates who are or claim to be trans. The Times specifies female prisons but doesn’t specify male trans inmates – thus creating pointless confusion in its own headline. The Times presumably is not even captive to the ideology, so why on earth does it do this?
Prison executives in Scotland have ruled that transgender criminals can serve time in female jails to allow them to prepare for life as women on release, according to a report.
Male transgender criminals.
Even trans inmates deemed too dangerous to serve their sentences in women’s prisons may be allowed to mingle with female inmates. Women’s campaigners have branded the decision “outrageous”.
Last week the Scottish Prison Service (SPS) published new policy on the management of transgender prisoners, due to come into effect in February.
Critics argue that the door has been left open for trans women, including
people[men] self-identifying as female who have convictions for violence against women, to serve their sentences in the female estate if there is “compelling evidence that they do not present an unacceptable risk of harm to those in the women’s prison”.
What could such “compelling evidence” be? Other than quadruple amputation?
The report says: “Transgender people in custody should be provided the opportunity and supported to work towards being accommodated in an estate that aligns with their affirmed gender so that, on release to the community, they have had the opportunity to live with those who share their affirmed gender.”
Does the report go on to say “Helpless women in custody should not be protected from the potential violence and abuse of delusional narcissistic men moving in with them”?
Russell Findlay, the Scottish Conservative shadow justice secretary, said: “The new policy on transgender prisoners effectively permits male sex offenders access to women’s prisons.
“In line with the SNP’s dangerous gender self-ID law, the rights of male-bodied sex criminals who say they are female are deemed more important than vulnerable women in custody.”
Conservatives get this while “progressives” do everything they can to conceal it.
I’m trying to imagine the way in which there can be a set of men who pose a danger to people outside prison significant enough that they must be incarcerated, but who don’t pose a danger to the inmates in a female prison.
It really seems to me like the two circles would be not just overlapping but concentric. I cannot imagine a warden looking at any case and concluding “Sure, he will rape and murder women out there, but he’ll never do that in here.” Because why?
On top of everything else, they think incarcerated women are good role models for these wannabes?
The mind reels.
“I’m trying to imagine the way in which there can be a set of men who pose a danger to people outside prison significant enough that they must be incarcerated, but who don’t pose a danger to the inmates in a female prison.”
Very insightful, Papito, and sadly true.
Of course we don’t see it running the other way; we don’t see females who identify as males campaigning to be placed in male prisons. The simple reason: their weaker bodies would put them in grave danger in such a location.
I don’t get the point? Is it to learn how to do proper makeup, have pajama parties where they all sigh over Ed Sheeran, have pillow fights and play Mystery Date? Learn how to change their penmanship to feminine flourishes? Practice writing their new names with the last names of the man they want to marry? Or do they think they will have lots of lesbian sex?
This is like Ladee Orientation, isn’t it? How long do they think they will circulate these men through the program before their final release?
Whether those women want them there or not.
They don’t “share” anyone’s “affirmed gender;” they’re women. Prison facilities were originally segregated on the basis of sex. However “affirmed” their “gender” may be, men remain men, and should be kept in male prisons, not foisted on women as some kind of intensive makeover project.
Quite apart from the inherent risk of being confined with male offenders, these women are not freelance bargain-basement social workers or therapists; they’re not there to help men with their elocution and comportment, free of charge; they aren’t there to stitch sheep’s clothing for wolves. Most of all, they are not in prison to be used by prison authorities as some sort of resource or utility for the purposes of reinforcing the opportunistic delusions of those male offenders being forced upon them. This is taking “Be kind” just a bit too far. People in prison are often said to be “paying a debt to society.” This training scheme for TiMs should not be any part of these female prisoners’ debt. These women are there to serve their own time, not to be dragooned into being teachers in some twisted finishing school for men, where they’re compelled to help shape TiMs into debutantes.