Job description
Huh. It turns out that insulting people isn’t part of a president’s duties.
Ex-President Donald Trump can be held liable for disparaging comments he made about a woman who accused him of rape, the US Department of Justice has said. Its lawyers previously argued Mr Trump was legally immune as he was president when he made the remarks in 2019. But on Tuesday government attorneys said they no longer had “sufficient basis” to conclude Mr Trump had acted within the scope of his duties.
…
The legal action cites his remarks as president about her in 2019 while responding to reporters’ questions. The lawsuit has been updated to reflect further comments he made about her during a CNN town hall the day after the court’s verdict two months ago.
The justice department had previously taken the position that Mr Trump could be defended by government attorneys because he was serving in his capacity as president when he made the remarks. But on Tuesday its lawyers said “there is no longer a sufficient basis to conclude that the former president was motivated by ‘more than an insignificant’ desire to serve the United States Government”.
That sums up Trump’s whole presidency and in fact his whole life. His desire to serve anyone or anything other than himself is insignificant.
Can someone please teach journalists how to write?
Have they read the whole Constitution? I’m pretty sure there’s a clause somewhere that specifically empowers the President to insult anyone he pleases. I think it’s in Article 19 or so.
Watergate as I recall was all about a POTUS name of Nixon not being above the law. Nix on that. But clearly, a POTUS with the name of Trump can trump the law. The name Trump thus denotes special privileges. I’m pretty sure that’s right, too.