I didn’t have to log in, the video plays here on the site, but there is a lot in Billboard Chris’s twitter that I can’t see due to twitter’s censoring and my refusal to join, which is unfortunate.
Laypeople throwing sex away is one thing, but this is a doctor, apparently unaware that male and female are collections of specific physical features. Even when humouring the desire to change gender and pronouns and all that, if the child has the features from the female side of the division, and no traits from the male side, then ‘he’ is female. Isn’t mismatch between sex and ‘gender idenniny’ the whole deal with being trans?
Note also the infantilising of trans people; can’t use ‘vagina’, gotta call it something euphamistic. Maybe hoo-ha? Biscuit? Ticklebox!
These teens whom she describes as ‘having sex’, to a background of music from a YouTube tourist advertisement and in a tone and pitch of voice usually reserved for telling toddlers “Now, we don’t throw our food on the floor, do we?”, these teens will be the very same ones who have been developmentally disabled by puberty blockers so that their brains have been forever stalled in adolescence? The ones who have been chemically (and perhaps even surgically) neutered and rendered incapable of orgasm? With whom are these child-women ‘having sex’? Wouldn’t it be more accurate to say that if (as the cult insists) they are their identities and not their bodies, they are, in fact , being subject to statutory rape?
Heterosexual sex is not “triggering” for these girls, but the word “vagina” is. I don’t think they are actually worried about the word vagina. I think they are being told they shouldn’t accept it being called a vagina, because that’s what girls have, and told so by ideologues. And I also wonder why boys who think they are trans have “She-penises” but girls who think they are trans completely think that the word “vagina” is a bad word for what they have, the organ which is integrated into their sexual productive system. Not because penises are a celebrated organ while vaginas are a denigrated one, surely?
How do you insult a male? Call him a “pussy,” of course.
Trans people seem to subscribe to two diametrically opposed schools of thought regarding the labeling of genitals. Some trans individuals will merrily go on about their “boy pussy” or their “girl dick,” often using even raunchier turns of phrase, and then be mortally offended when it inevitably turns out that this rebranding does not make their genitals appealing to homosexuals of the opposite sex. Other trans people refer to their genitals using anatomical terms specific to the opposite sex and throw fits if anyone dares to use sex-appropriate terminology. Clitorises are called penises and vice versa; male anuses are called vaginas, while vaginas are reframed as a kind of surplus anus (a “front hole” or a “bonus hole”). Predictably, this doesn’t work any better at winning over partners who just aren’t attracted to the actual genitals in question.
As the smoke rises upward: This is consistent with the DSM entry on gender dysphoria, which observes that the early and late onset cohorts are divergent in symptoms.
You have to log in to see the video on Twitter, but I’m not a Twit.
I didn’t have to log in, the video plays here on the site, but there is a lot in Billboard Chris’s twitter that I can’t see due to twitter’s censoring and my refusal to join, which is unfortunate.
Laypeople throwing sex away is one thing, but this is a doctor, apparently unaware that male and female are collections of specific physical features. Even when humouring the desire to change gender and pronouns and all that, if the child has the features from the female side of the division, and no traits from the male side, then ‘he’ is female. Isn’t mismatch between sex and ‘gender idenniny’ the whole deal with being trans?
Note also the infantilising of trans people; can’t use ‘vagina’, gotta call it something euphamistic. Maybe hoo-ha? Biscuit? Ticklebox!
These teens whom she describes as ‘having sex’, to a background of music from a YouTube tourist advertisement and in a tone and pitch of voice usually reserved for telling toddlers “Now, we don’t throw our food on the floor, do we?”, these teens will be the very same ones who have been developmentally disabled by puberty blockers so that their brains have been forever stalled in adolescence? The ones who have been chemically (and perhaps even surgically) neutered and rendered incapable of orgasm? With whom are these child-women ‘having sex’? Wouldn’t it be more accurate to say that if (as the cult insists) they are their identities and not their bodies, they are, in fact , being subject to statutory rape?
Boom. Yes, it would.
Heterosexual sex is not “triggering” for these girls, but the word “vagina” is. I don’t think they are actually worried about the word vagina. I think they are being told they shouldn’t accept it being called a vagina, because that’s what girls have, and told so by ideologues. And I also wonder why boys who think they are trans have “She-penises” but girls who think they are trans completely think that the word “vagina” is a bad word for what they have, the organ which is integrated into their sexual productive system. Not because penises are a celebrated organ while vaginas are a denigrated one, surely?
How do you insult a male? Call him a “pussy,” of course.
@Mike Haubrich:
Trans people seem to subscribe to two diametrically opposed schools of thought regarding the labeling of genitals. Some trans individuals will merrily go on about their “boy pussy” or their “girl dick,” often using even raunchier turns of phrase, and then be mortally offended when it inevitably turns out that this rebranding does not make their genitals appealing to homosexuals of the opposite sex. Other trans people refer to their genitals using anatomical terms specific to the opposite sex and throw fits if anyone dares to use sex-appropriate terminology. Clitorises are called penises and vice versa; male anuses are called vaginas, while vaginas are reframed as a kind of surplus anus (a “front hole” or a “bonus hole”). Predictably, this doesn’t work any better at winning over partners who just aren’t attracted to the actual genitals in question.
As the smoke rises upward: This is consistent with the DSM entry on gender dysphoria, which observes that the early and late onset cohorts are divergent in symptoms.