Equivalent to “sexual racism”
Let’s revisit that article by Jo Bartosch last November about Stonewall’s calling a BBC investigation “equivalent to racism.” (It’s in the Daily Mail but you know the drill – the Graun won’t publish such things.) I did a post on it then.
Jo writes:
For many, it was a brave and long-overdue airing of an important and distressing subject: a painstaking investigation into claims that predatory trans women have been pressuring lesbians for sex, published on the BBC News website.
But a leaked email shows that the influential trans lobby group Stonewall attempted to suppress the investigation before it had even been published – and made the extraordinary claim that debating the issues was equivalent to ‘sexual racism’.
And today a QC repeated the claim at Allison Bailey’s tribunal.
Earlier this month, the BBC followed several other high-profile bodies, including Whitehall departments, in dropping its membership of Stonewall’s Diversity Champions programme.
Under the scheme, employers pay the lobby group to help ‘embed LGBTQ+ inclusion’ in the way they work.
The BBC’s announcement came two weeks after the Corporation published an investigation by journalist Caroline Lowbridge in which some lesbians told how they felt pressured into having a sexual relationship with trans women – specifically, men who say they are women but who have retained their male genitals.
THE investigation cited three lesbian women who said they feared being labelled ‘transphobic’, and risked being shunned and threatened by the gay and trans community if they refused to take trans women as partners.
I remember when “lesbian women” would have been redundant. Now, I guess, you have to specify.
[I]t has emerged that months before the article appeared Stonewall’s chief executive Nancy Kelley wrote to the editorial director of BBC News to denounce Lowbridge’s work in an apparent attempt to get her piece stopped.
In her email, Kelley suggested that the BBC article would end up being ‘transphobic’ because it represented trans women as ‘sexual predators’, which was a ‘central anti-trans argument’.
She further complained that the ‘highly toxic’ cotton ceiling issue was ‘analogous to issues like sexual racism’.
And today a QC repeated the claim at Allison Bailey’s tribunal.
Even that’s not specific enough, though. You also have to specify what you mean by “women” and even “female” or these words will be taken to include males.
Lesbian Female Oppressive Karen’s?
I opened my mouth yesterday in front of a woman who replaced me at work. She is heavily involved in “diversity” stuff. She denied this is real. Of course she did. . She means well, but totally into the whole thing.
I am so glad I am retired. My relatively conservative suburban employer had not mandated pronouns in our email correspondence, unlike the State of California, but I bet that is coming
“If all it takes to be a woman is to identify as one, how was it wrong for Rachel Dolezal to claim to be black?”
“Shut up! You can’t compare gender identity to race! They’re different.”
“I see. Well, is it ok if I don’t want to have sex with a trans woman?”
“No, that’s sexual racism!”
“But you just said…”
“Shut up!”
So, sexism. It’s not true, but the word would be sexism. Fucking numpties.
Can we not mention that while #NotAllTranswomen a disproportionate number of transwomen to their percentage of the population do seem to be sexual predators? Blanchard’s taxonomy does leave something to be desired, but whereas transsexuals are definitely more likely to be prostitutes, autogynephiles seem to do sexual violence and straight up violence at a higher rate.
Blood Knight @5 — I’d be interested to hear your criticisms of Blanchard’s taxonomy.
Best way to control people: control their flow of information. Dr Goebbels would have approved, I am sure.
@Lady Mondegreen:
Unfortunately my criticism isn’t all that clever. His taxonomy is basically the Periodic table before we started artificially creating elements. There’s just so much more going on now than transexuals and AGP.
Oh come now, Blood Knight. The Gender Identity movement has room for more kinds of sexual predators than just rapists in skirts.
https://reduxx.info/top-academic-behind-fetish-site-hosting-child-sexual-abuse-fantasy-push-to-revise-wpath-guidelines/
There’s also castration fetishists in button-downs.
Blood Knight @8
Oh, I don’t think it’s meant to be comprehensive.
https://4thwavenow.com/2017/12/07/gender-dysphoria-is-not-one-thing/
But goodness knows it’s hard to keep up.
https://reduxx.info/top-trans-medical-association-collaborated-with-castration-child-abuse-fetishists/