Man wonders what all the fuss is
Man writing about Lia Thomas in the Times pretends not to know what everyone knows:
So much is open to interpretation each time Thomas jumps into the pool. She is a transgender woman, and has excelled this season while competing on the women’s team. She owns the best marks in the nation among college swimmers in the 200 and 500 freestyle, but for some, her success has also set two pillars of the sporting ethos — inclusion and fair play — in conflict.
So little is open to interpretation if you’re not being dishonest. Thomas is a man, so of course he “has excelled” while competing on the women’s team. He’s excelled by cheating.
Thomas has become a red-meat topic for right-wing media, a divisive matter for L.G.B.T.Q. advocates and a thorny subject for competitors as well as the N.C.A.A. and other sports governing bodies, who are trying to chart a path for athletes who do not fit neatly into the sex classifications used in most sports.
Who says Thomas doesn’t fit neatly into the sex classifications used in most sports? Besides Thomas? He fits plenty neatly into the male classification from what I can see and have read.
While there have been an increasing number of transgender athletes who have transitioned while in college, the ones who generate the most attention (and criticism) are transgender women who compete in women’s events — and who win.
Yes, and they get the most criticism because they’re giving themselves a massive physical advantage. It’s very simple if you’re not pretending not to understand.
[T]he Ivy League championships lie ahead next month and then the N.C.A.A. championships arrive in March. That will almost assuredly raise the temperature again, as has happened when iconic figures like Michael Phelps, who is making a second career as a mental health advocate, and Martina Navratilova, a champion of L.B.G.T.Q. rights, questioned whether Thomas should compete on a women’s team.
Others, meanwhile, will wonder when the discussion will be centered less on the winner than on the human being.
What about the female human beings who are being cheated by William Thomas? Can we center the discussion on them?
And so if there was something enduring about Saturday, it was not the two races that Thomas comfortably won or the two relays where she gamely tried. It was the way she carried herself in the water — head down, with grace and ease.
Bros before hos.
See, there’s your problem. You insist on continuing to think women are human beings. Women don’t matter to the bros because women don’t matter. It is obvious women have no moral standing within the ethical paradigm of the sports world (or most other words, frankly, like rape crisis centers, women’s restrooms, women’s short lists…)
At least this story gave some relevant facts that a lot of articles of this type leave out. Thomas was a good collegiate swimmer when competing against men — some second-place finishes in the Ivy League championships. But, despite being slower now (15 seconds in the one race example given), she is now posting world-class times in women’s events.
That’s a fact that just has to be grappled with. No doubt Thomas trains very hard, etc. etc. — all the stuff that is usually praised. But did Thomas just discover this work ethic post-transition? Why was hard work, competitive drive, a love of swimming, etc. only good enough for second in the Ivy League (which, don’t get me wrong, is a nice achievement), but now it’s good enough to compete with Olympians (which is a completely different kettle of fish)?
Here’s the situation I’m waiting for: Say two transmen are competing — one has gone the whole castration/vaginoplasty/hormone treatment route, with an attendant loss of strength, while the other is a “newbie” who competed as a man just last season, but now “Identifies As” female. The newbie wins, hands-down. Did “she” cheat? The metaphorical shoe will be on the other foot, won’t it? Are we headed for a narcissism of small differences, when in their demand for “fairness”, it will be the trans-identified who demand separate categories in which to compete?
Found this quote in the original article:
So Thomas is making sure any interview is going to be with a sympathetic outlet, and the school officials are now buckling down on any opportunity for dissent by the other swimmers. Trump WISHES he had that kind of media control.
The school officials have been doing that all along, from what I’ve read. Remember that recent story about training in Florida or wherever it was? The school told the swimmers not to wear any gear with university logos, and they did what they were told – except “Lia,” who made a point of always wearing gear with the university logo visible. The girls have to shut up and hide; Lia can do whatever he wants.
@5: Link?
I don’t have it in my pocket and you can search for it just as easily as I can.
It’s easy to do something with ‘grace and ease’ if you don’t actually have to work at it. (How much of a suckup does this author have to be?)
@6: Here, a few days ago
http://www.butterfliesandwheels.org/2022/she-compares-herself-to-jackie-robinson/
The link Life with Lia
Thanks Dave. You’re so much nicer than I am!
Ophelia@5: Oh, I remembered those columns, too. But this is still a step beyond that. It’s commonplace for institutions to try to strongarm people who might say something unflattering about them in public. It’s another matter entirely for them to admit, bald-faced, that they are doing so to the press, and to ask the press to go along with it.
This is the appalling state of journalism today. Twenty years ago, the reaction to that statement would’ve been for the paper to flood the campus with freelancers–including approaching, say, j-students who might be interested in an internship–and getting them to get those interviews. Because the one thing any journalist worth their weight should know is that the people the institution doesn’t want you talking to are exactly the people whom you want to talk to.
Oh yes I see what you mean. I seem to have missed your point entirely, sorry. I blame the mist of rage these stories always cause me…
‘including approaching, say, j-students who might be interested in an internship’–that is such a good point! What a great story this could be for a student who wants to demonstrate her/his reporting chops.