In UK woman’s…
Oops.
Makes ya think, don’t it.
The wording is deliberate, I think…on Google you see
Gwyneth Paltrow’s ‘vagina’ candle explodes in UK woman’s …
And even when you see the whole thing you still flinch just a bit before you register the last word. Wicked but in this case appropriate, I think, given the preposterous recklessness of millionaire Paltrow telling women to shove her expensive candles up themselves*.
Plus it’s funny. Paltrow needs to be an object of ridicule.
Maybe she could team up with trans women of the “include us in your women-only swimming pools” type to create ever more expensive and dangerous quack remedies designed specifically for the Trans Laydeez.
H/t Rob
*She didn’t tell them that, as far as I know. It was jade eggs she told women to insert. I got my paltrows crossed; apologies!
Provided she thought it financially worth her while, she could market a special model of the candle designed exclusively for the trans lot. She might perhaps consider calling it the Clacker-Quacker, the Cloaca-Farker or even the Arsehole-Flagpole, fitted with national flag of choice as an optional extra. The possibilities are endless. And by its very nature, there is only one direction her business can go: and that is UP.
(If you take my meaning.)
(NB: I can only take so much of this.)
Did Paltrow tell women to insert the candles? If nothing else the girth of the damn things would be rather uncomfortable.
Ha, now you mention it, no – it was the jade “eggs” she said to insert. The candles smell like her vagina, that was it. But that in itself must surely inspire her worshipers to insert insert insert, girth and discomfort be damned.
Easy to get mixed up, to be fair. I mean, if we were playing a round of “which of these products really exists?” And I was faced with
A) Gwyneth-Paltrow-vagina-scented candle, or
B) Candle, to be inserted in vagina for health benefits
I don’t know which would strike me as more likely.