Interesting. Rukmini Callimachi is a correspondent for The New York Times covering ISIS & al-Qaeda and an analyst for NBC and MSNBC.
2. In fact the evidence pointing to that came as three discrete facts: a) A pattern of travel showing Suleimani was in Syria, Lebanon & Iraq to meet with Shia proxies known to have an offensive position to the US. (As one source said that’s just “business as usual” for Suleimani)
4. And finally, a) and b) were read in the context of c) Iran’s increasingly bellicose position towards American interests in Iraq, including the attack that killed a U.S. contractor and the recent protest outside the American embassy.
6. One official described the planning for the strike as chaotic. The official says that following the attack on an Iraqi base which killed an American contractor circa Dec. 27, Trump was presented a menu of options for how to retaliate. Killing Suleimani was the “far out option”
And his base will believe it. Many, many, many people I talked to during Bush 42 were convinced if we didn’t attack Iraq, we would have to fight the Iraqis here. They believed Iraq was the mastermind behind 9/11, in spite of no evidence (even less than for the killing of Suleimani).
It’s all about bringing joy to his base and fear to everyone else for the next election.
And his base will believe it. Many, many, many people I talked to during Bush 42 were convinced if we didn’t attack Iraq, we would have to fight the Iraqis here. They believed Iraq was the mastermind behind 9/11, in spite of no evidence (even less than for the killing of Suleimani).
@iknklast
Bush 42? Not 41 or 43?