Don’t cross the equality and diversity guidelines
Sorry to cite the Daily Mail, but you know how it is – sometimes the quality papers are looking fixedly in the other direction.
A birth coach has been ‘ostracised’ by her professional organisation after transgender activists branded as offensive a Facebook post in which she said that only women can have babies.
Lynsey McCarthy-Calvert, 45, was forced to stand down as spokesperson for Doula UK and has since resigned altogether from the national organisation for birth coaches. Her exit comes after transgender rights activists triggered an investigation in which Doula UK concluded her message breached its equality and diversity guidelines.
What equality and diversity guidelines are those then? Ones that say men can have babies? Is there a big market for birth coaches who think men can have babies? Wouldn’t prospective clients be worried the doula might get confused on the big day and start coaching Daddy?
‘I am angry and sad,’ she said last night. ‘I was effectively ostracised for saying I am a woman and so are my clients.
‘I have been very disappointed by Doula UK’s response. The leadership are paralysed by not wanting to upset transgender rights activists. They have fallen over themselves to acquiesce to their demands.’
Their demands to treat women as oppressive privileged class enemies, and to remove all mention of them from public life.
The Doula UK row started after Cancer Research UK dropped the word ‘women’ from its smear test campaign, instead saying screening was ‘relevant for everyone aged 25-64 with a cervix’.
In response, Mrs McCarthy-Calvert posted a photograph on Facebook of a negligee-clad woman somersaulting underwater, with the wording: ‘I am not a “cervix owner” I am not a “menstruator” I am not a “feeling”. I am not defined by wearing a dress and lipstick. I am a woman: an adult human female.’
Beneath it she wrote: ‘Women birth all the people, make up half the population, but less than a third of the seats in the House of Commons are occupied by us.’
She claimed women were accused of transphobia more than men, arguing men were not ‘subjected to cries of bigotry and transphobia when they say they don’t want to have sex with a woman with a penis’. Most trans-women have not had their male genitalia removed.
…
Days later, around 20 trans activists wrote a letter of complaint claiming Mrs McCarthy-Calvert had ‘clearly’ breeched Doula UK policies stating that members ‘shouldn’t post anything that our colleagues, clients and affiliates would find offensive’.
They alleged that the post contained several ‘trans exclusionary comments’ including the description of a woman as an ‘adult human female’.
Doula UK immediately withdrew Mrs McCarthy-Calvert as spokesperson and, after a four-month investigation, its board of directors concluded in March the post ‘does breach Doula UK’s guidelines’.
Last night, Doula UK denied it had ‘acquiesced’ to activists or that Mrs McCarthy-Calvert had been ‘in some way driven out of the organisation’.
A spokesperson added: ‘We are proud to say that we seek to listen to the lived experience of marginalised groups and make changes – including changes to the language we use – if we believe it is necessary to make the Doula UK community more welcoming and supportive.’
So it’s welcoming and supportive to tell male people they can gestate babies? And to punish a woman for saying it’s women who gestate babies?
It’s upside-down world.
As long as those marginalized people are not cervix-havers, menstruators, or any other euphemism. In short, as long as they are not adult human females, formerly known as women.
‘Lived experience’ is one of those magic phrases by which you state a belief and no one is allowed to disagree.
I’m completely with Mrs. McCarthy-Calvert on this issue, and the caption to this Facebook post is great, but the image sounds (I haven’t seen it) like an odd choice…
The ideal image to encapsulate the issue would be a cross-section of a man in profile with a baby lodged behind the penis, complete with the caption Biology Matters.
Serious question: what percentage of women (sorry, “persons who biological sex is female”) don’t know what a cervix is or whether or not they have one? It may not be a large number, but I’m betting it’s non-zero.
Urging “cervix-havers” to get cancer screening instead of “women” could endanger lives.
Screechy, it might be larger than you realize, at least in certain parts of the country. When I was teaching Biology in Texas, I found out that my college freshman students didn’t know which sex had the uterus, and on the pig test, they correctly identified the pigs testicles and told me the pig was a female. (Perhaps it identified as? I never asked the pig; but it wasn’t speaking, anyway, since its insides were spread on the lab table).
I have found since coming to Nebraska that the situation is no better. Students are not being given sex education, and Biology classes often avoid talking about such things so they don’t offend the parents. And the parents aren’t teaching them, because…well, because parents have never been good at teaching that sort of stuff, whether from embarrassment (like my mother) or lack of knowledge themselves (like some of my friend’s mothers).
So, yeah, it could cost lives. But, hey, those lives are only women, right? (Unless they identify as men, but it becomes increasingly obvious that the trans activists are focused on MtF trans.)