Historians struggled to cite an equivalent threat
Meanwhile Trump is still trying to put the muscle on CNN, as is totally normal for presidents to do.
President Trump took his long-running attacks against CNN to a new level on Monday by suggesting in a series of tweets that a consumer boycott of its parent company, AT&T, could force “big changes” at the news organization.
“I believe that if people stoped [sic] using or subscribing to AT&T, they would be forced to make big changes at CNN, which is dying in the ratings anyway,” Trump tweeted. “It is so unfair with such bad, Fake News!”
The comment, which Trump tweeted in response to seeing CNN coverage while traveling in London during a European tour, fueled criticisms that the president was using his power inappropriately to intimidate critics.
Whaddya mean inappropriately? He hates CNN. He’s the president. You do the math.
Historians struggled to cite an equivalent threat even from presidents such as Richard Nixon renowned for their hostility toward the press. Less democratic nations with more tenuous press freedoms often use government regulatory power, criminal investigations or tax audits to punish news organizations seen as providing unflattering coverage, but past U.S. presidents rarely have taken such public shots at the businesses of the owners of major American news organizations, historians said.
By “rarely” they mean “never,” but they’re being cautious. Don’t want to make him mad, obvs.
I remembe when the then president-elect (I think) Trump made disparaging remarks about Boeing and another company that caused share price fluctuations and everyone screamed that he couldn’t do that. now outright attacks pass with barely a mention because it’s just become the expectation. He’s totally a menace.
He’s an overgrown infant. He should be in short pants with an all-day sucker.
Omar, I’m not sure about the short pants, but he’s certainly sorted for suckers – and suckers-up.